Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Let's watch TV instead of radar

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Let's watch TV instead of radar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Feb 2013, 18:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Let's watch TV instead of radar

UK mulls 'radical' shake-up of air traffic control

Mmmm, much better idea than using dedicated and managed systems. I guess I'm turning into one of those Luddites that the man from Thales has in mind!

Last edited by Spitoon; 12th Feb 2013 at 18:02.
 
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The proposed system works by utilising the TV transmitters that are dotted around the UK.
Each will receive the same TV signal but at a slightly different time because of the reflections and interactions with aircraft flying in their vicinity.
The received signals are then compared to the original broadcast, and the difference is used to locate the position of the aircraft.
Could some knowledgeable person elaborate - one of the basic principles is apparent but the Beeb "technology reporter" is a bit sparse with the detail!

2 s
2 sheds is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: utopia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a hare brained wide area multilateration proposal whipped up to grab government funding
Tigersaw is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Orbit
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Standard navigation charge of £145.50pa could do wonders for reducing airfares.
Ninja Controller is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern England
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a hare brained wide area multilateration proposal whipped up to grab government funding
Far from it. It works and potentially has a number of advantages over conventional radar. The biggest limitation has been range and resolution but last week Indra announced they have built a successful high resolution system. Plenty on the web including wikipedia if you care to look.
eglnyt is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a scheme to free-up space for mobile phones, so that more people can ring more people and shout. "I'm on the train".
To hell with the safety of those in aeroplanes.
HS2 enabling, isn't it, Mmm?
Marvellous.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And by the way, what will happen when peoples' 42'' Panasonic suddenly switches from Brucies' Strictly Come Dancing From Hell On Ice I'm A Waste Of Carbon Atoms Get Me Out Of Here....
To a close-up of the Ockham hold?
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 19:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
eglnyt,
I see a major MATS2 re-write on the horizon.....

Telly Information Service.
Telly Control Service.
Basic Service, i.e. CBBC.
Carol Voordeman Service.

Last edited by ZOOKER; 12th Feb 2013 at 19:59.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 20:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Sounds like a scheme to free-up space for mobile phones, so that more people can ring more people and shout. "I'm on the train".
You're not wrong there.

"There is an increasing demand for the use of the electromagnetic spectrum and it is likely that the current frequency allocations for PSR, in both the L- and S- bands, will come under threat, with MSPSR offering the potential to provide improved coverage and performance for a smaller frequency allocation."
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 21:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: utopia
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EGLNYT:
Yes, I'm being a bit cynical tonight
Its been bubbling under for many years (eg silent sentry), but I would doubt even the TV broadcast transmitters will be with us in another 20 years, their spectrum also sold off as we move forward to an ever connected all you can eat interwebbery
Tigersaw is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2013, 21:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the Air Defence chaps had a system like this in the 1960s.
canard68 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 11:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 520
Received 311 Likes on 127 Posts
The TV broadcast band has recently been reduced to make way for 4g mobile services. Further channels will be removed by 2018.
There is a school of thought that by the early 2020's the majority of TV reception will be either from satellite or over fast broadband, which will make maintenance of the elaborate terrestrial TV network uneconomic and subject to closure.
So it would be inadvisable to base any new service on it.

Last edited by Sallyann1234; 13th Feb 2013 at 11:29.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 14:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
I think the Air Defence chaps had a system like this in the 1960s.
Come to that, Watson-Watt's original radar trials in the 1930s made use of BBC broadcast transmissions.

Plus ça change.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 14:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
1) To do this, the ITU would have to agree, and with some countries having very few TV transmitters, I can't see this happening.
2) There would have to be a 'robust' safety case to get the CAA to agree.
3) The CAA would probably require the signal to be 'clean' ie not carrying any broadcast material. This would negate one of the so-called advantages, as it would require dedicated transmitters, rather than use existing ones. As a 'for instance', the DGPS signal presently transmitted by commercial FM stations is not accessible from aviation GPS' presumably for this same reason.

Last edited by chevvron; 13th Feb 2013 at 14:53.
chevvron is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 15:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Herts
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is just the same as GPS but with a different reference source, surely ? And surely it means that a receiver in the aircraft will have to work out the position, and then transmit it like mode S ?
rsuggitt is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 15:13
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you ever seen what happens when there is QRM to the GPS system? And watching ADS-B equipped aircraft is fun too! What is wrong with the tried and tested radar system currently in use? Presumably extra links would have to be installed from the TV sites to the ATCCs and airfields?
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 16:05
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: 29 Acacia Road
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prestwick Centre TV has been U/S for over a week, cant see that being sustainable if the radar pic went the same way...
landedoutagain is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 16:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 520
Received 311 Likes on 127 Posts
This is just the same as GPS but with a different reference source, surely?
There's very little information given, but my understanding is that this would be a primary rather than a secondary system, i.e. not relying on anything in the aircraft.
As someone with considerable experience in this area, I can see all sorts of potential problems. It seems that the proposal relies on time differences for reflection of signals from multiple TV sites. I'm assuming that they would be looking at the TV signal carriers rather than the modulation on them, but this is complex matter with the current COFDM signals (8,000 carriers per multiplex)..
And each TV channel is used many times over across the country. Re-use of each channel is planned to minimise co-channel interference to domestic reception on the ground, but an aircraft will see and reflect signals from many transmitters on the same frequency. I'm not sure how the proposed system will sort them.

To deal with chevron's points:
1) the ITU would probably take little interest unless some modification was required to the TV transmissions, since the frequency planning criteria would not be affected. And if this was just a UK system, foreign broadcasts would not be needed.
2) and 3) yes absolutely.

I really believe for a whole host of reasons this is a non-starter.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 17:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
There's a more detailed account of the research project here:

Air Traffic Control Systems Could Ditch Radar And Release 5G Spectrum

which is worth a read.

Given that the participants in the research include both NATS and Roke, dismissing it as a crackpot idea may be a tad premature.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 13th Feb 2013, 18:18
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
landedoutagain,

Which TV? You have loads of 'em up there.
If it's the one in the lounge, then it's a W2 problem.
If it's the one in the canteen, (sorry staff restaurant), relax, enjoy the food, the sunsets* and the view of Arran*, - especially at breakfast time.

*You don't get these features at Swan-wick.
ZOOKER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.