Standard speed during descent
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The moon
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I read something very good in a 1968 737 operations manual recently. It said to plan 320 KTS for the climb and 320 or 350 KTS for descent! Easily know the price of fuel was so cheap back then. I find taht 300 KTS works fairly good in the London TMA. Our ECON descent is 273 KTS which is way to slow, but when I hear jets cruising at 0.74 and then descending at 240 KTS, that's just not right.
High speed all the way
High speed all the way
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find taht 300 KTS works fairly good in the London TMA. Our ECON descent is 273 KTS which is way to slow, but when I hear jets cruising at 0.74 and then descending at 240 KTS, that's just not right.
High speed all the way
High speed all the way
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: not the W.P.
Age: 70
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not just let the aircraft fly the speed that they want. After all, they pay the fuel bill and if their Company wish to exercise control re. fuel burn then that is their business. ATC seem to be interfering far to much with the speed that aircraft fly at with only scant knowledge of what is or isn't an appropriate speed and then after lots of vectoring all over the sky ending up in one of the TMA holds for 15 minutes. Tell the plane how long the likely holding is as early as possible and then let the pilots work out their best speed to try to achieve minimum holding.
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: solent-on-sea
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh of course, why didn't I think of that. Except of course where the sector length involved, as is often the case, is just enough to end up with 2 aircraft abeam each other instead of nicely in trail, overtaken or not. Still, I'm sure the next sector will sort it out....
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The South
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one aircraft from an Irish based airline which operates many 737s was descending from the cruise to around FL200 at 330kts the other day!
If there's no delay, 270-290kts seems to be the norm (unless you're a turboprop!). If I'm not too busy I'll normally ask No 1 in the stream what they're planning on converting to. Anything over about 15mins delay and I'm slowing people back to 250- kts .
Even with Mode S there are still a few pilots trying their luck flying a different speed to what I've given them. So frustrating - you're on a speed for a reason.
If there's no delay, 270-290kts seems to be the norm (unless you're a turboprop!). If I'm not too busy I'll normally ask No 1 in the stream what they're planning on converting to. Anything over about 15mins delay and I'm slowing people back to 250- kts .
Even with Mode S there are still a few pilots trying their luck flying a different speed to what I've given them. So frustrating - you're on a speed for a reason.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can tell how late a flight is by the speed they select. Paris CDG to Heathrow is such a route where the competing airlines that fly it will cruise between 240kts and 340kts without saying anything. Likewise a certain German carrier will climb at 340kts almost without fail. Telling an aircraft it has 15+ minutes delay still doesn't mean they can slow right down, some routes have level restrictions that must be met and can be impossible at the optimum speed so 280kts+ may be necessary.
But obviously we have hundreds of miles of free airspace so I can just use vectors to avoid all the other aircraft flying the same route at different speeds, taking into account avoiding other FIRs, sectors and military training areas. Such a simple job I am surprised they haven't trained monkeys to do it yet....
And don't even start on "radar heading"!!
But obviously we have hundreds of miles of free airspace so I can just use vectors to avoid all the other aircraft flying the same route at different speeds, taking into account avoiding other FIRs, sectors and military training areas. Such a simple job I am surprised they haven't trained monkeys to do it yet....
And don't even start on "radar heading"!!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Down South
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why not just let the aircraft fly the speed that they want. After all, they pay the fuel bill and if their Company wish to exercise control re. fuel burn then that is their business. ATC seem to be interfering far to much with the speed that aircraft fly at with only scant knowledge of what is or isn't an appropriate speed and then after lots of vectoring all over the sky ending up in one of the TMA holds for 15 minutes. Tell the plane how long the likely holding is as early as possible and then let the pilots work out their best speed to try to achieve minimum holding.
Last edited by The Many Tentacles; 24th Jul 2012 at 19:01.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The moon
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one aircraft from an Irish based airline which operates many 737s was descending from the cruise to around FL200 at 330kts the other day!
You make it sound like it was a crime....
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Telling an aircraft it has 15+ minutes delay still doesn't mean they can slow right down, some routes have level restrictions that must be met and can be impossible at the optimum speed so 280kts+ may be necessary.
I find using a phrase "expect FL150 at XXX reduce to minimum speed to achieve that" usually works.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use that phrase all too often now 250kts. Most of the tight SA's on my sectors are used for separation too so quite crucial to meet them. Sadly getting the arrivals in at lower levels is only possible for short spells no longer than 30 minutes, something that is in the pipeline to be sorted, but its been stuck in the pipe for over 20 years!! Wonder who that will be then........