Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Question for ATC Australia

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Question for ATC Australia

Old 27th Nov 2011, 21:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sunny NQ
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for ATC Australia

I was reading the latest Flight Safety Australia ( link for anyone who is interested) http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_asset.../nov-dec11.pdf
and came across an article on page 58 which talks about an Ansett Vickers Viscount 720 which is believed to have broken up in flight due to bad weather after departure.

The last section of the article says the following.




My question is, does ATC have access to weather radar or anything similar which can be used as possible weather avoidance for pilots flying IFR without weather radar? This article seems to indicate that it was possible. If so, how does the system work? Is it simply the BOM weather radar superimposed on the screen of the controller as the article indicates?
benharris10 is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 02:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: YMML
Posts: 1,838
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Nothing so sophisticated I'm afraid. We only get the BOM radar pictures displayed on a monitor - exactly as you get from their website. i.e. indicative only & updated every 10 minutes.
le Pingouin is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2011, 06:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 59
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and from what I remember, it's only a small monitor too.
stevep64 is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2011, 05:55
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...to be superimposed on radar displays...

First proposed in the '60s and we're still waiting on it.
5miles is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2011, 06:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Brisbane
Age: 59
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didn't notice when I did my tour of BNE centre, but are the BoM radar images centered on BNE, or Mt Stapylton? I visited the BoM station across from the tower recently and their radar image is centered on the airport.
stevep64 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2011, 03:38
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Sunny NQ
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the responses guys, I didn't think it was there but was curious when I read the article.

Out of curiosity, would it be helpful from a controllers point of view? IE, Brisbane for example, could you now start to plan which inbound aircraft are likely to require weather diversions and possibly plan accordingly?

Theoretically it wouldn't be that hard to do, the boys at AVPLAN (ipad app) can do it on a track and that is on an IPAD with an expandable scale....

I understand that weather avoidance would (and should) still be completely up to the pilot, but it could be helpful.

I also noticed the following in the Jeppesen Documents ( ATC-112)

8.12 Weather Radar
8.12.1 Weather radar data derived from BoM radar sites is displayed at various ATS working positions by means of a PC based system known within Airservices as METRAD, and within the military as RAPIC.
8.12.2 METRAD / RAPIC images are not 'real time' but are the results of a ten minute update cycle. The most effective range of the radars is up to 75NM
8.12.3 Weather radar sites, which may be utilized by ATS are shown below (Diagram in Jepps). Weather radar information within 75NM of radar sites is available to pilots, subject to ATS workload on request
8.12.4 When providing METRAD/RAPIC information to pilots, ATS officers will use the prefix " MET RADAR DISPLAY INDICATES"
Is that the display that le Pingouin is talking about?
benharris10 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2011, 03:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: meh
Posts: 674
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes. As written, only used for info out to 75 miles not avoidance. Assuming it is the same as two years ago it is useless for anything other than alerting those who ride bikes/motos to work that they will be getting wet.
Plazbot is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2011, 23:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst far from ideal, it's hardly useless.
Not much good on a micro level, but good for planning or anticipating alternative approach or circuit entry requirements.
5miles is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.