Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

LVP's and Approach Minima

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

LVP's and Approach Minima

Old 16th Mar 2011, 20:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: the dark side
Posts: 936
LVP's and Approach Minima

http://www.aaiu.ie/upload/general/13...2011_005-0.PDF

A very sobering initial report regarding the recent accident at Cork.
jumpseater is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2011, 17:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 84
Scary stuff.

I find it interesting that it's not mentioned in the report whether the crew reported the runway/lights in sight, especially on the 3rd and what sadly turned out to be their last attempt. I guess they did, presumably at some point before or upon hearing 'minimums' (considering they chose to continue).

Hope I don't get comments from the anti-speculation police. I'm merely commenting on something I thought might have been mentioned in the report.
twentypoint4 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2011, 16:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Wilmslow and North Yorks
Age: 49
Posts: 402
Sadly it looks like a series of very poor decisions.

ComJam is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2011, 16:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 5,789
it's not mentioned in the report whether the crew reported the runway/lights in sight,
"Reported" to who (whom?)?

AFAIK it's not usually a requirement to report it to ATC and the standard call between the pilots on the flight deck at Decision Height would possibly be something as simple as "land" or "go-around" (depends on company procedures).

I would agree it's not clear from the initial report if the crew ever saw the lights.

Last edited by wiggy; 18th Mar 2011 at 17:09. Reason: ".....between the pilots.."
wiggy is online now  
Old 18th Mar 2011, 16:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,582
I doubt very much they did on the first two approaches anyway. What happened on the third is for the enquiry, although it may have to be 'unknown'.

R&P - wiggy is correct. There is no requirement for a call other than going around or clear of the sensitive area.
BOAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.