Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

E.G. QF 999"heavy"???????

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

E.G. QF 999"heavy"???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jul 2010, 06:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Right we're you least expect
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E.G. QF 999"heavy"???????

Thought I would ask you ATC guys and girls. When an a/c callsign finishes with "heavy" does indicate some sort of performance restriction? does ATC us this to seperate different types of a/c based on wake turbulence?????
At what A/C weight does a/c become "heavy"
Just curious thats all!!
Cheers
mic310 is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 07:11
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'day mic310,

From the Oz AIP

Regards,
BH.


8. WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION STANDARDS
8.1 Categories
8.1.1 For the purpose of wake turbulence separation, aircraft are divided
into the following weight categories:
a. SUPER (J) - A380 Aircraft;
b. HEAVY (H) - All other aircraft types of 136,000 KG maximum
take-off weight or more;
c. MEDIUM (M) - Aircraft types of less than 136,000KG maximum
take‐off weight but more than 7,000KG maximum take‐off
weight;
d. LIGHT (L) - Aircraft types of 7,000KG maximum take‐off
weight or less.
Note: B757 and H47 (Chinook) are categorised Heavy (H) when
the following aircraft is categorised either Medium (M) or Light (L)
and categorised Medium(M) when the preceding aircraft is categorised
Heavy (H).
Bullethead is online now  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 11:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: swanwick carp lake
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It tends to be american pilots that suffix their callsigns with heavy. I couldn't care less, but they love it. No other vortex category does it except the new A380's and then only singapore tend to do it. They love being super super with weely big wings
ImnotanERIC is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 12:39
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Age: 52
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/160.pdf


Indication of Aircraft Type
For A380-800 aircraft the letter “J” should be entered into the space allocated to wake turbulence under Item 9 of the ICAO flight plan.
For A380-800 aircraft the expression “SUPER” should be included immediately after the aircraft call sign in the initial radiotelephony contact between such aircraft and ATS units.




4. RADAR WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA
(PANS-ATM 8.7.4.4 and 8.7.4.4.1)
4.1 The following wake turbulence radar separation minima should be applied to aircraft in the approach and departure phases of flight in the circumstances given in 4.2.
Preceding aircraft Succeeding aircraft
Wake turbulence radar separation minima:

A380-800-A380-800 Not required*
A380-800 Non-A380-800 HEAVY 11.1 km (6.0 NM)
A380-800 MEDIUM 13 km (7.0 NM)
A380-800 LIGHT 14.8 km (8.0 NM)

*When a wake turbulence restriction is not required then separation reverts
to radar separation minimum as prescribed by the appropriate ATS
authority. The recommendation of the ad hoc group (safety case) indicated
that no wake constraint exists for the A380-800 either following another
A380-800 or a non-A380-800 HEAVY aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------
SKYbrary - Wake Vortex Turbulence


En route
ATC traffic separation standards in controlled airspace will not necessarily prevent significant encounters with wake turbulence and the greater risk of injury because both Cabin Crew and some passengers will probably not be secured in their seats. However, it is unlikely that any loss of control will be more than very brief and easy recover from if at least minimum ATC separation standards are maintained.
The only available direct defence against occupant injuries is for the flight crew to maintain situational awareness by monitoring other traffic in the vicinity by listening out on RTF and by use of the TCAS Display and then use the seat belt sign and direct communication with Cabin Crew to temporarily secure all occupants if in-train climbing or one-level-above traffic is observed up to 10 nm ahead and confirmed with ATC as being a significantly larger aircraft type.
ATC awareness of the persistence of wake turbulence at en route altitudes beyond reqired traffic separation minima is sometimes poor.

Last edited by prascho; 29th Jul 2010 at 12:59.
prascho is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 19:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably an ego thing. I know you are a Heavy or a Super because your flight strip says so, in the same way that Concorde always checked in as "Speedbird Concorde 1" yes we know that you are but if you feel the need to tell everyone on the frequency then work away......
WhatMeanPullUp is offline  
Old 29th Jul 2010, 20:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Oz
Age: 48
Posts: 74
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't have the docs with me, but I know there is a requirement for Heavies to check in with APP and TWR (I think) with 'HEAVY' on first contact. In Oz anyway. It's in the Doc4444 somewhere too. Don't think it's an ego thing mostly. Maybe the crews just chuck it in to cover all bases for where it's required and not required.

Arigato,

Showa Cho
Showa Cho is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2010, 04:30
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Right we're you least expect
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cheers

Thanks very much for the response everyone. A good example of how pprune can be useful
mic310 is offline  
Old 30th Jul 2010, 06:02
  #8 (permalink)  
conflict alert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Refers to the weight and size of the captains wallet.
 
Old 30th Jul 2010, 15:09
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In defence of our colleagues across the pond, it's not a 'my plane is bigger than yours' thing but it is written in the FAA rules somewhere. Here are some examples.

http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publi...c/atc0204.html

-4-14. WORDS AND PHRASES

a. Use the words or phrases in radiotelephone and interphone communication as contained in the P/CG or, within areas where Controller Pilot Data Link Communications (CPDLC) is in use, the phraseology contained in the applicable CPDLC message set.

b. The word “heavy” shall be used as part of the identification of heavy jet aircraft as follows:

TERMINAL. In all communications with or about heavy jet aircraft.

EN ROUTE. The use of the word heavy may be omitted except as follows:

1. In communications with a terminal facility about heavy jet operations.

2. In communications with or about heavy jet aircraft with regard to an airport where the en route center is providing approach control service.

3. In communications with or about heavy jet aircraft when the separation from a following aircraft may become less than 5 miles by approved procedure.

4. When issuing traffic advisories.

http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publi...4/aim0402.html

5. Air carriers and commuter air carriers having FAA authorized call signs should identify themselves by stating the complete call sign (using group form for the numbers) and the word "heavy" if appropriate

For info, having heard my first Super designator over the Canada last night.

FAA Issues Interim ATC Procedures For Airbus A388 Flights
Down Three Greens is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2010, 06:26
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All this 'heavy' came about some years ago when a DC-9 (trainer) was flipped upside down and crashed, approaching the runway behind a DC-10 in Texas (Greater Southwest airport, now closed).
411A is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2010, 08:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: any town as retired.
Posts: 2,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PA28 light

In future I will use the call sign light, when on first contact with my local major airport.

Trust this will stop me being eaten by a hungry 380.
Gulfstreamaviator is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2010, 08:57
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We don`t use the category "Light" in this part of the world so even a Gulfstream is Medium and gets nothing extra behind an A320/B738 etc.
Tower Ranger is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2010, 09:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Probably an ego thing. I know you are a Heavy or a Super because your flight strip says so, in the same way that Concorde always checked in as "Speedbird Concorde 1" yes we know that you are but if you feel the need to tell everyone on the frequency then work away......>>

In the UK there is a requirement for crews to specify aircraft type on first contact with some ATC units. This is because airlines change type without informing ATC and it is essential information for wake turbeluence purposes.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2010, 11:18
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes sense in the Radar environment but I find it quite funny when they use Super as part of the callsign on the ground, I can see out of these windows you know lol!!
Tower Ranger is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2010, 05:52
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: EU
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to ICAO DOC 9432 Manual of Radiotelephony:
"2.7.2.4 Aircraft in the heavy wake turbulence category shall include the word “HEAVY” immediately after the aircraft call sign in the initial contact between such aircraft and ATS units."
jaker is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2010, 00:33
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MATS Part 1 Appendix B

Aircraft with a MTOM of 162,000 kg or greater are required to be announced as 'Heavy' or 'Super' in the case of the A380, in the initial call to each ATSU.
Mister Geezer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.