What is 'tactical vectoring'?
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ISZ - not the end of the world, but you can see it from here.
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vectoring not for separation, but for getting the a/c onto an instrument approach, outside CAS, when the a/c is in receipt of a RIS. (TS in 12 days)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't agree with the previous correspondent. Tactical vectoring is, effectively, killing two birds with one stone. Eg, You have opposite direction traffic you need to provide separation from and could turn right or left. However, a right turn would place your aircraft on a long base leg. So, you've provided a) separation and b)achieved an expeditious approach. That's Tactical Vectoring.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mr Liu - Looking through your previous posts, you had claimed to be an "ATC Instructor" in China and yet you have been asking questions as if you knew very little about Air Traffic Control? 
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: downwind
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cloudyapple：
Yes, actually I have been teaching ATC for a couple of years, because the way we provide ATS is quite different from what you do, I just want to make something much more clear, and I am quite interested in what you do in the UK. Of course I have my own answers to the questions I asked, I am just eager to know what you think on the same topic, I would like to make some comparison between the different ways to solve the same problem.
When I read DOC4444, I really have something I can't understand very well, because there 's something we never apply before, for example, we don't have uncontrolled airspaces in china, so I am eager to know everything about uncontrolled airspaces, we don't use mode s to identify the aircraft, so I am quite interested in how you use mode s etc.
I hope you understand that well.
Yes, actually I have been teaching ATC for a couple of years, because the way we provide ATS is quite different from what you do, I just want to make something much more clear, and I am quite interested in what you do in the UK. Of course I have my own answers to the questions I asked, I am just eager to know what you think on the same topic, I would like to make some comparison between the different ways to solve the same problem.
When I read DOC4444, I really have something I can't understand very well, because there 's something we never apply before, for example, we don't have uncontrolled airspaces in china, so I am eager to know everything about uncontrolled airspaces, we don't use mode s to identify the aircraft, so I am quite interested in how you use mode s etc.
I hope you understand that well.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tactical vectoring needn't be as specific as HD's answer - it could be as simple as turning an aircraft 20-30 degrees off track for 15-20 miles in order to give continuous climb.
There is no hard an fast answer to what tactical vectoring is - with area, approach and ATSOCAS to take into consideration, it could be any number of things.
You might even 'tactically vector' one aircraft in order to give some benefit to another... Any radar vector applied by an ATCO which helps them resolve a situation is a tactical vector.
There is no hard an fast answer to what tactical vectoring is - with area, approach and ATSOCAS to take into consideration, it could be any number of things.
You might even 'tactically vector' one aircraft in order to give some benefit to another... Any radar vector applied by an ATCO which helps them resolve a situation is a tactical vector.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: On a foreign shore trying a new wine diet. So far, I've lost 3days!
Age: 75
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just one example of tactical vectoring
In the Area Control environment if you have, say, two aircraft, one above the other approaching top of descent, the higher aircraft will generally require descent clearance before the lower aircraft. In order to provide this you can use tactical vectoring to turn the higher aircraft left or right to facilitate its descent, instead of being forced into a step descent situation. It all depends on your available airspace, of course. I understand in Mainland China you have to keep aircraft rigidly inside airways so tactical vectoring, as above, may not always be an option for you.
If you get the opportunity try and visit Hong Kong to see tactical vectoring. It is used by Area controllers and Approach controllers every day. Or if you can't visit Hong Kong try to get to somewhere that has radar coverage of the Hong Kong area to see it in action. Better, of course, to visit in person and have it explained to you.
On the beach
If you get the opportunity try and visit Hong Kong to see tactical vectoring. It is used by Area controllers and Approach controllers every day. Or if you can't visit Hong Kong try to get to somewhere that has radar coverage of the Hong Kong area to see it in action. Better, of course, to visit in person and have it explained to you.
On the beach
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Near the MTR
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you get the opportunity try and visit Hong Kong to see tactical vectoring. It is used by Area controllers and Approach controllers every day.
Please leave them to Attol when I am on!!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When Heathrow is on easterlies, traffic routing towards the Bovingdon holding area from the north can sometimes be turned early on to a long base leg..
S*ds Law dictates that the moment the Intermediate Director North turns someone for a snatch, his/her opposite number on the south side will have just snatched something on it's way to Ockham... Oh what fun controllers have!
S*ds Law dictates that the moment the Intermediate Director North turns someone for a snatch, his/her opposite number on the south side will have just snatched something on it's way to Ockham... Oh what fun controllers have!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: 29 Acacia Road
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To counteract Sods law, have you considered installing a loud catchphrase style buzzer in the room, so that whichever controller buzzes in first gets the first snatch?
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Miami, Florida USA
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radar Tactical Vectoring
Dear ATC Colleagues
I've been teaching ATC for quite a long time.
There are some words in the ICAO document 4444 that unfortunately are not defined. Tactical vectoring is one of them.
When I teach radar vectoring, I teach my students to;
1.First get situational awareness of the operational situation;
2.Then, they have to create a strategic plan in order to address the ATC situational operation demands. I call that; Vectoring Strategic Planning;
3.Simultaneously,I encourage them to create backup plans in order to have alternatives in case the main plan fails;
4.And finally, they have to implement the plan by doing some specific actions. That’s what I call; TACTICAL VECTORING.
5. Follow and validation comes at the end in order to keep on going or to apply the best corrective action or plan.
So! What is tactical vectoring?
Well, yes… it could be issuing one single heading. However, it’s in my opinion, more than issuing headings.
According to the DOC 4444 - Headings: is the provision of navigational guidance to aircraft in the form of specific headings, based on the use of radar;
Therefore, there’s got to be a distinctive definition for tactical vectoring. My empiric definition is as follows:
Tactical Vectoring is the provision by radar controllers of navigational guidance to aircraft in the form of specific headings, combined with altitude management and speed control with the operational objective of:
a.sequencing efficiently and safely arrival and departure traffic;
b.segregating efficiently and safely arrivals from departures:
c.applying the prescribed radar/vertical separation minima based on specific operational requirements;
d.reducing route length and enhancing optimum climb and descent profiles;
e.reducing adverse environmental impacts, such as engine noise over populated areas and emission of carbon footprint;
f.bearing in mind economic aspects when handling traffic such as; aircraft fuel consumption, aircraft tear and wear, social and aviation business related economic consequences derived from delays
Radar Controllers should consider the following factors when providing navigational guidance or tactical vectoring:
i.Traffic situation and conditions
ii.Airspace configuration
iii.Weather conditions
iv.Flying distance
v.Airborne navigational equipment
vi.Aircraft performance
vii.Pilot qualifications and style
viii.ATCO radar equipment capability and skills
ix.Coordination factor
Please, be advised that some controllers call this tactical sequencing.
Later I can post the tactical vectoring tools that are available to ATCOs.
I would like to brush up this definition to its maximum potential; therefore, I encourage you to give your contribution. I appreciate your wise assistance on this subject.
Best regards to all of you,
I've been teaching ATC for quite a long time.
There are some words in the ICAO document 4444 that unfortunately are not defined. Tactical vectoring is one of them.
When I teach radar vectoring, I teach my students to;
1.First get situational awareness of the operational situation;
2.Then, they have to create a strategic plan in order to address the ATC situational operation demands. I call that; Vectoring Strategic Planning;
3.Simultaneously,I encourage them to create backup plans in order to have alternatives in case the main plan fails;
4.And finally, they have to implement the plan by doing some specific actions. That’s what I call; TACTICAL VECTORING.
5. Follow and validation comes at the end in order to keep on going or to apply the best corrective action or plan.
So! What is tactical vectoring?
Well, yes… it could be issuing one single heading. However, it’s in my opinion, more than issuing headings.
According to the DOC 4444 - Headings: is the provision of navigational guidance to aircraft in the form of specific headings, based on the use of radar;
Therefore, there’s got to be a distinctive definition for tactical vectoring. My empiric definition is as follows:
Tactical Vectoring is the provision by radar controllers of navigational guidance to aircraft in the form of specific headings, combined with altitude management and speed control with the operational objective of:
a.sequencing efficiently and safely arrival and departure traffic;
b.segregating efficiently and safely arrivals from departures:
c.applying the prescribed radar/vertical separation minima based on specific operational requirements;
d.reducing route length and enhancing optimum climb and descent profiles;
e.reducing adverse environmental impacts, such as engine noise over populated areas and emission of carbon footprint;
f.bearing in mind economic aspects when handling traffic such as; aircraft fuel consumption, aircraft tear and wear, social and aviation business related economic consequences derived from delays
Radar Controllers should consider the following factors when providing navigational guidance or tactical vectoring:
i.Traffic situation and conditions
ii.Airspace configuration
iii.Weather conditions
iv.Flying distance
v.Airborne navigational equipment
vi.Aircraft performance
vii.Pilot qualifications and style
viii.ATCO radar equipment capability and skills
ix.Coordination factor
Please, be advised that some controllers call this tactical sequencing.
Later I can post the tactical vectoring tools that are available to ATCOs.
I would like to brush up this definition to its maximum potential; therefore, I encourage you to give your contribution. I appreciate your wise assistance on this subject.
Best regards to all of you,
