Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

The term "Souls on board"

ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

The term "Souls on board"

Old 27th Jan 2009, 18:39
  #21 (permalink)  
Odi
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ice Station Zebra
Age: 54
Posts: 91
As the Information Assistant at Shawbury, I once asked the pilot of a Hercules what his pob was; to be told "11 plus an orangutan". I was dying to ask if he always called the loadie that....!

The Hercules was transporting the orangutan from Dudley Zoo to Jersey Zoo.
Odi is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2009, 20:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Karup, Denmark
Age: 67
Posts: 175
"Roots Radical": "Unfortunately I've heard the term souls and persons used together.
An RAF Herc was repatriating the bodies of a downed RN Heli, I asked for his POB and he replied " 7 persons, 11 souls"

Excactly! I also heard it at Kabul. For the firemen to sort out the bits after a crash. Grim - but practical!
normally right blank is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2009, 21:43
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 260
In the situation you quote (smoke in cockpit), unfortunately POB is something the Airport Fire Service do need to know, and it might literally be a matter of life and death. There have been too many tragic accidents over the years, when the aircraft has landed and stopped intact, yet people have died in the ensuing/continuing fire. As much as we all hope it never happens again, the AFS have to know how many they're looking for if they have to go in.
I've yet to work at an airport when I could be confident that the handling company could be contacted and give me, within a couple of minutes, the exact and final POB figure.
I know nothing of the DUB incident, but strongly doubt the controller was either trying to p*** the crew off or make idle conversation!
NudgingSteel is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2009, 22:00
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kildare, Ireland
Posts: 41
I know nothing of the DUB incident, but strongly doubt the controller was either trying to p*** the crew off or make idle conversation!

Of course he wasn't, I never meant that he was. It was just this incident that got me wondering how can it be that in such a professional field like aviation, where every i has to be dotted and every t crossed, an ambiguous term like soul can make it in there as an industry-wide term, when its only real meaning takes its origins from religion......which we all know is THE root of all confusion in the world! why even the replies to this thread can't agree on when its meaning and when/if it should be used.....7 persons/11 souls on board....wtf does that mean???! The flightplan form only has a space for POB...why not SOB then too?
Otto Nove Due is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2009, 22:35
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UAE
Posts: 210
Otto

If you carefully read the replies, you wouldn't have made your last post

Last edited by Rule3; 27th Jan 2009 at 22:37. Reason: Mistake
Rule3 is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 09:52
  #26 (permalink)  
Dop
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croydon (but really from Barnsley)
Age: 61
Posts: 262
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the old joke:
Q:How many souls on board?
A:None, we're atheists!
Dop is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2009, 19:14
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in the middle
Age: 38
Posts: 11
Don"t like it either!I"d rather say Persons on Board."Souls"sounds like everyone "s gonna be dead in a moment.
Lady-ATC is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2009, 21:20
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,520
Otto Nove Due

For an aircraft that has a deceased person in the hold being repatriated, then Souls on Board will differ to Persons on Board.

The deceased is still a person but one could argue that their soul has departed. So in this case, Souls on Board is the correct term since if the correct Persons on Board figure was given, then the fire and rescue crew would be waiting a very long time at the bottom of the slide for the last 'Pax' to be accounted for!

Its a simple and long standing tradition and one that was drummed into me during my early PPL days.
Mister Geezer is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2009, 11:01
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester
Age: 42
Posts: 615
I believe it's the reason that a NOTOC has to declare HUM (Human remains) on it. That said, I've known of people put ashes down as HUM. Would take a quick skipper to spot that one !!!

Not actually sure what ICAO have to say on that one.
Ex Cargo Clown is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2009, 21:47
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 46
Posts: 15
Otto - I'm with you. It's a load of crap. This thread proves that there is confusion over whether it includes corpses. And just from a personal point of view the use of the word annoys me a bit - me and my main man Richard Dawkins think is sucks.
cheakymunkie is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2009, 08:09
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 723
Many moons ago, I had an pilot report that his aircraft had "120+1+1 POB", I subsequently asked the Fire Section to explain. The immediate reply was "120 people plus one infant plus one corpse". Having said that, I've never seen the breakdown of POB in the manuals.

I always understood SOB to be an Americanism.
FantomZorbin is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2009, 21:28
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: oxford
Posts: 41
How about "15 POB and 1 coffin". Would that not make it easier for everyone to understand?
moony is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 05:46
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
I understood "Souls onboard" to originally have come from seagoing... e.g. "Sunk all souls lost"... OK, its use today may have some religious overtones(?) but cannot see why this fuss about terminology.

The issues around asking for POB (or souls) are equally diverse. I was told under training that it was so the Crash Teams knew how many to rescue... going back into the blazing inferno etc. Logical, except if you've ever witnessed a crash, tell me if the passengers stand around waiting to be counted... I don't think so? If POB is more than twenty the chances of this working IMHO are slim.

HOWEVER... there is a very sad story of a Dutch military transport catching fire. There was confusion over the numbers onboard and it was assumed to be carrying cargo so no efforts were made to check the back of the aircraft until it was too late and the large number of passengers - who might have been rescued - perished (there's another word to debate if you like?) SO... whether you ask for POB, Souls, check with the Operator... I guess its always going to be better to have that information than not... it might save someone's life. (and to my mind asking the pilot is he best option... OK (s)he might be busy, but the lives of their passengers are THEIR responsibility so I wouldn't expect a professional to mind that question)
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 08:00
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cornwall
Age: 46
Posts: 61
Just another twist

POB
PAX on Board or Persons on Board??

Always prefered Souls on Board

snips is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 08:14
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 0
Correct. All flights carrying deceased NEED to record and pass persons and souls; the reason being, if you stack it off the end of the runway and the fire trucks come to cut you out, its only fair to them to pass the number of living souls on the aircraft. No point of them entering a burning aircraft if the only people on the aircraft were dead when the frame rolled.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 08:54
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,294
IMHO Vin Rouge has got it right, as has Roots radical.

If the AFS needs to enter an aircraft to rescue people, they will do so until impractical, often risking their own lives. Obviously if they know there are 3 living people on board and 2 dead bodies, they will stop putting their lives at risk once they have the 3 living people rescued!

Snips

POB is Persons, not PAX - there are many aircraft round that do not carry pax!
anotherthing is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 16:34
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 44
by all means let's tie up frequencies with

"well there's 15 pax, 5 crew, 1 monkey, a corpse oh....and 3 atheists"

sob so much easier and quicker even if a bit morbid
Coast is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 21:22
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: oxford
Posts: 41
Coast,

If atheists don't believe in God, why should they think they have a soul. Don't agree with you at all. The crash crews go into the wreckage to try and rescue the number of living people that were reported to be on the ac. Would you risk your life to save to save a bird or pull a coffin from the crash site when there are higher priorities. P(persons not PAX)OB is the proper way to descibe the number of people that is aboard the ac.
moony is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 21:34
  #39 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Pierre Argh
and to my mind asking the pilot is he best option... OK (s)he might be busy, but the lives of their passengers are THEIR responsibility so I wouldn't expect a professional to mind that question
 
Old 4th Feb 2009, 14:50
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 8
This is what can happen when there is confusion regarding the number of persons on board:

SUMMARY of the reports compiled after the air crash involving the Lockheed C-130 Hercules, registration number CH-06 at Eindhoven Air Base on 15 July 1996
(The Hague, 25 September 1996)

NBDC - Summary of the Hercules Crash
Acer101 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.