Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

T5 @ Heathrow, any impact in number of aircraft movements?

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

T5 @ Heathrow, any impact in number of aircraft movements?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Mar 2008, 07:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
T5 @ Heathrow, any impact in number of aircraft movements?

Hi there, donīt know if this is the best forum to post the question in but figured that you guys that are handling the airport knows best.
Will/has the new terminal lead to an increase in aircraft movements or is it just a matter of stuffing more pax into the tubes in shorter time?
On a similar note, is there much free capacity left to cram more movements to/from Heathrow? I recently visited the Stockholm Arlanda tower and learned that the biggest issue there is gate availability for certain types of flights such as Schengen/US.

Cheers!
Tordan is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 09:24
  #2 (permalink)  

Time merchant
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All statements issued so far indicate no extra aircraft movements, just the capability to handle more pax more efficiently and in greater comfort (for BA anyway).
There is no spare capacity at Heathrow. Its generally 44 arrivals per hour maximum, and there is no possibility to increase that.
flowman is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 11:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, suspected as much.
Tordan is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 12:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow is scheduled to 98% of its capacity, itself about 10% more than is desirable, as such a high scheduling places great service pressure on the system that operates it (NATS). Not much headwind reduces capacity to the extent that Heathrow quickly becomes oversubscribed and robustness of service deteriorates accordingly.

In my view, this degree of scheduling puts inappropriate levels of pressure on the Final director to achieve minimum spacing in all conditions, on a near saturated r/t frequency, with a high proportion of foreign operators, using an airspace system that was not designed for this level of traffic - and which currently does not build in a vertical safeguard when traffic is turning in towards each other form opposite sides. Under such circumstances there is little time or, most importantly, ATCO & r/t capacity, to correct errors of judgement and as a result spacing errors often get left uncorrected. NATS' own wake vortex separation figures conclusively prove this.

This situation is the direct result of the interpretation of the government's policy of "...best use..." to mean maximum use. There is no more room at Heathrow; T5 is principally a service improver, with some additional capacity available if a decision is made to increase runway capacity.

.4
120.4 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 12:24
  #5 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 120.4
T5 is principally a service improver, with some additional capacity available if a decision is made to increase runway capacity.
I understood that next year there will be 3 less stands available than there is currently. Awaiting Heathrow East to provide more stands. If thats correct then there is a dependancy on increasing runway capacity AND parking.

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 12:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. What we actually need, it seems to me, is some joined up thinking on this whole issue.

.4
120.4 is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2008, 18:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't GMC 3 to begin when T5 opens? I heard that T5 will mean more movements in the central area between the runways so might make things on ground a bit more difficult.
747-436 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.