Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Virgin 747 this morning at MAN

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Virgin 747 this morning at MAN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2005, 10:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Virgin 747 this morning at MAN

This morning just after 7am a Virgin 747 flew low over our house in Cheshire , I assume after going around from 24R at MAN. I'm not bothered why but the flight path was unusual (A 747 at that height at that time of the morning does not go unnoticed!). Normally go-arounds that I've seen from 24R turn right. Is there a new procedure in place that takes them over Wilmslow?

JT
JimmyTAP is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 11:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: farnborough
Age: 54
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gotta friend who lives in Stockport reports the same thing. Unfortunately he drives a mini-bus and has little aviation knowledge, but he says that there was a Aer Lingus behind the Virgin and the Aer Lingus 'was all over the show' on approach. The Virgin went over his house about 10 minutes later.
Chromium is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 12:25
  #3 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: poll position
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
police aircraft farting about to the north normally requires a nonstandard go around. Maybe that.

Cheshire countryside is a far superior landscape to over fly than a didsbury downwind anyway.
dicksynormous is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 12:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More likely to have been emergency traffic to the north of the field and ATC not only wanting a clear runway - hence the go-around - but also wanting to keep all traffic well out of the way.

Scottie Dog
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 13:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To save all the speculation this is what happened
DH8 loses an engine departing 24L ,declares a Mayday and wants to land visually on 24R ASAP. The Virgin B747 and EI A320 where broken off the approach to achieve this and the only way they could go was south. DH8 lands safely on 24R.
Just another day at the office.
opnot is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 13:58
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With respect I wasn't "speculating" as to why and in fact said so in my first post but asked why it was directed in an unusual direction after the go-around. At that hour of the day it did elicit a "WTF" type of response, having a 747 thundering over yer house. I've lived in the area for many years and this was unusual.

It probably triggered all of the local noise monitoring sites as well.

JT
JimmyTAP is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 14:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
opnot

Thanks for that - just confirms what I posted, but without wanting to disclose airline/aircraft!

As you say, just another day at the office.
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 14:28
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cheshire, UK
Age: 60
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DH8 loses an engine departing 24L ,declares a Mayday and wants to land visually on 24R ASAP.
Just another day at the office?

As usual with go-around threads on here I'm sorry I asked now.

JT
JimmyTAP is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 15:25
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: cheshire
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jimmy Tap
I did not mean my reply to sound off hand, all I was trying to do was to clarify what had happened this morning before we had pages of speculation .
Please do not stop postings, you are entitled as anybody else is , to ask questions you would like to know the answer to
opnot is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 15:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: In front of a computer
Posts: 2,358
Received 93 Likes on 37 Posts
So the question now is "what happened to the Dash 8 and it's emergency landing?" BACitiexpress perchance?
ETOPS is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 21:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: London,England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just another day at the office
Not for the pilots I suspect, an engine failure at, or shortly after, take-off is a once in a career event nowadays unless you are flying something very old.
Max Angle is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2005, 23:11
  #12 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes Max, but meaning no disrespect to the crew who no doubt handled it very professionally, this the ATC forum and for the controllers it's just one of those things that you have to sort out and then deal with the next bunch of aircraft.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.