Distances on Contact with Heathrow Director
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In la la land.......
Age: 45
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Distances on Contact with Heathrow Director
On first contact with Heathrow Director (120.40) aircraft are given a distance in miles from the airfield.
I've often wondered if this distance includes the base leg/final approach vectoring which the a/c will have to travel to intercept the ILS or is it a guestimated distance based on current position and traffic levels?
Thanks as ever!!
z...
I've often wondered if this distance includes the base leg/final approach vectoring which the a/c will have to travel to intercept the ILS or is it a guestimated distance based on current position and traffic levels?
Thanks as ever!!
z...
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
..... and usually equals your altitude in '000s of ft x 3 .... . If it is more than that you are off on the scenic tour of West Berkshire (landing easterlies) or Berkshire then back into Essex (westerly ops)....
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Topbunk - No, not at all. The distance to touchdown at Heathrow depends almost entirely on traffic ahead and not necessarily on the altitude of the aircraft. Obviously if someone is way too high then adjustments are made but the pressure to maintain the spacing is such that some a/c have to expedite descent and others might get a few more miles than their range suggests.
The directors know the ranges of those on the ILS and the spacing required (taking into account VORTEX, weather, etc) and simply add the gaps to produce the range from touchdown. Allowance is made in the calculation for the fact that those on the ILS are doing 160, those on base 180 and those downwind 210. With experience it becomes quite easy.
I'm sure that my ex-colleagues will agree...
The directors know the ranges of those on the ILS and the spacing required (taking into account VORTEX, weather, etc) and simply add the gaps to produce the range from touchdown. Allowance is made in the calculation for the fact that those on the ILS are doing 160, those on base 180 and those downwind 210. With experience it becomes quite easy.
I'm sure that my ex-colleagues will agree...
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HD
I was poking fun - it's just that frequently (maybe 90% of the time) the formula I suggest is the response from your ex-colleagues!
Regardless of that, I know that the LHR (and LGW) system of ATC is amongst (if not THE) best around when it comes to calculating EAT's and track miles (but then again you don't often need EAT's elsewhere ).
I was poking fun - it's just that frequently (maybe 90% of the time) the formula I suggest is the response from your ex-colleagues!
Regardless of that, I know that the LHR (and LGW) system of ATC is amongst (if not THE) best around when it comes to calculating EAT's and track miles (but then again you don't often need EAT's elsewhere ).
Only half a speed-brake
Then it must be the well done tricks of your colleagues on previous sectors and joint effort / experience, that in fact most of the time, it comes very close to TopBunk's equation.
In a certain UK document I have read (noise, CDA, LP/LD approaches) there was a section regarding use of a software tool to help you calculate the track or perhaps air miles, is such thing being used as well?
In a certain UK document I have read (noise, CDA, LP/LD approaches) there was a section regarding use of a software tool to help you calculate the track or perhaps air miles, is such thing being used as well?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlightDetent... and others. I think there must still be some misunderstanding amongst pilots of how air traffic controllers actually function. Long, long ago I showed round a BA Command Course at Heathrow. During the Q&A sessions at the end one guy asked "where is the computer which tells you what headings to give us". I merely pointed at my head and he was duly amazed. Most of my UK expereince has been in busy LTMA airspace and up until the time I retired there was absolutely no computer assistance available which determined the timing and nature of instructions passed to pilots. There are tools for conflict alert and tools to provide information regarding flight plans to contollers but the actual decisions regarding instructions given to pilots are determined by the controller without any outside prompting (except when they are under training and a training officer maybe nudging them).
ATCOs are fully aware of the alt divided by range rule - they practice it every time they do their emergency training, but the question posed by this thread concerned the Heathrow Final Director. His method is to look at the radar display, count the aeroplanes and apply his skill and experience to determine the ranges from touchdown to be passed to the pilots.
At ALL times the controller decides this in his head - there is no external magic box which does it for him. Twice during my time at Heathrow we trialled computer assisted approach sequencing tools and rejected them either because they were unsafe or because they could not better a properly trained and experienced controller.
ATCOs are fully aware of the alt divided by range rule - they practice it every time they do their emergency training, but the question posed by this thread concerned the Heathrow Final Director. His method is to look at the radar display, count the aeroplanes and apply his skill and experience to determine the ranges from touchdown to be passed to the pilots.
At ALL times the controller decides this in his head - there is no external magic box which does it for him. Twice during my time at Heathrow we trialled computer assisted approach sequencing tools and rejected them either because they were unsafe or because they could not better a properly trained and experienced controller.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlightDetent
I think you are referring to FAST - Final Approach Spacing Tool.
I don't know if it is working or has been tried, but I doubt it would work any better than the (highly trained) ATCOs eyeball.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR
You'd be amazed at how little some pilots understand about ATC. I have been told that at Heathrow the controllers start at BNN and take one aircraft off each stack going clockwise!?.. I replied that actually it is anti-clockwise.
G W-H
I think you are referring to FAST - Final Approach Spacing Tool.
I don't know if it is working or has been tried, but I doubt it would work any better than the (highly trained) ATCOs eyeball.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR
You'd be amazed at how little some pilots understand about ATC. I have been told that at Heathrow the controllers start at BNN and take one aircraft off each stack going clockwise!?.. I replied that actually it is anti-clockwise.
G W-H
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<<I replied that actually it is anti-clockwise.>>
Gawd - you're giving away trade secrets there Giles!!!
Yes, it was FAST fairly recently and CAAS (Computer Assisted Approach Sequencing) about 25 years ago.
Gawd - you're giving away trade secrets there Giles!!!
Yes, it was FAST fairly recently and CAAS (Computer Assisted Approach Sequencing) about 25 years ago.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAST.....
We trashed that a few years ago... The terminal folks found that they were doing just as good as the machine if not better, and to make the machine to better ( as good as the controller ) it was going to take a lot more time and money. We ( the controllers ) told them to save the money and spend it elsewhere. The FAA did and FAST isn't really being used in the terminal environment. However, the other parts of CTAS are still alive and well and being put to very good use.
regards
Scott
We trashed that a few years ago... The terminal folks found that they were doing just as good as the machine if not better, and to make the machine to better ( as good as the controller ) it was going to take a lot more time and money. We ( the controllers ) told them to save the money and spend it elsewhere. The FAA did and FAST isn't really being used in the terminal environment. However, the other parts of CTAS are still alive and well and being put to very good use.
regards
Scott
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, big request coming up here.
Is anyone in a position to post a picture of the radar display (or from the Sim) showing a typical pattern on a busy day at LL? It would be such a valuable teaching tool for all of us. If we could then persuade HEATHROW DIRECTOR or his friends to post a few words explaining what is going on, I think we would all get a better insight into how it all works.
I guess that to preserve your identity you might have to ask a "friend" to take the picture, but just think - we will be able to revisit the whole helicopter traffic/cleared ILS debate, the crossing the zone debate and how the stacks are really emptied anti-clockwise discussion - with pictures!!!
I know it is a lot to ask, maybe the training section could help (Mr Chips??).
If we could make this work, I think it would be a feather in the cap for Pprune.
Yours hopefully
G W-H
Is anyone in a position to post a picture of the radar display (or from the Sim) showing a typical pattern on a busy day at LL? It would be such a valuable teaching tool for all of us. If we could then persuade HEATHROW DIRECTOR or his friends to post a few words explaining what is going on, I think we would all get a better insight into how it all works.
I guess that to preserve your identity you might have to ask a "friend" to take the picture, but just think - we will be able to revisit the whole helicopter traffic/cleared ILS debate, the crossing the zone debate and how the stacks are really emptied anti-clockwise discussion - with pictures!!!
I know it is a lot to ask, maybe the training section could help (Mr Chips??).
If we could make this work, I think it would be a feather in the cap for Pprune.
Yours hopefully
G W-H