Alex Whittingham
7th Aug 2003, 21:59
I'm having a problem sorting out the exact shape of the induced drag curve and relating it to the induced power curve. The theory suggests that induced drag is at a maximum in the hover and reduces with forward speed at quite a high initial rate which then reduces as the rotor disc has to be tilted forward more at higher speeds to overcome the parasite drag. Some diagrams show exactly this (Wagtendonk page 34).
The RAF and RN books (AP3456, AP129, Mathieson) don't show drag curves but skip instead to power required curves. AP3456 and Mathieson show induced power required out of ground effect at any steady forward airspeed as a constantly reducing line at low forward speed, a reflection of the drag line from Wagtendonk.
So far, so good, but AP129 has a diagram in it that shows induced power out of ground effect as constant initially, then reducing. Now AP129 is usually very exact, and I'm not sure whether to rely on the modern books or whether they are simplifying the situation to relate it to fixed wing induced drag, which is a slightly different beast.
Can anyone clarify this please?
The RAF and RN books (AP3456, AP129, Mathieson) don't show drag curves but skip instead to power required curves. AP3456 and Mathieson show induced power required out of ground effect at any steady forward airspeed as a constantly reducing line at low forward speed, a reflection of the drag line from Wagtendonk.
So far, so good, but AP129 has a diagram in it that shows induced power out of ground effect as constant initially, then reducing. Now AP129 is usually very exact, and I'm not sure whether to rely on the modern books or whether they are simplifying the situation to relate it to fixed wing induced drag, which is a slightly different beast.
Can anyone clarify this please?