Old Man Rotor
3rd May 2003, 06:44
Over the last year or so there has been a number of "Threads" discussing the "Pro's and Con's" of "reality based training.............in other words, how far can we go with our exercises without the result of our training being counterproductive.
Counterproductive in the terms of not being benificial as a training tool, due to the "skill" not being able to be sufficiently demonstrated and practiced as you are outside the safety and performance aspects of the aircrafts envolope, and hence there is an area within the exercise that is "Talked" about but not performed, therefore a false sense of achievement or knowledge is consolidated.
Also counterproductive with the extreme costs involved when something goes wrong. This cost is not only in $$$ terms [which is the easiest to handle] but also in the security of the organisation and the welfare of all that depend on the monthly paycheck [paycheque].
Also the damage it does to the individuals involved, I am not referring to physical injuries [in which I understand no one was hurt in the attached picture] but the memory and apprehension that each pilot will take with them on each flight forever more.
And finally [and this is the main focus of my post] but more specifically to the discipline of Checking and Training in general.
Take the attached as an example.....obviously someone went wrong.
From third hand information, an Hyraudlics #1 failure was being practiced in the hover!..[not an unreasonble exercise, considering that an offshore platform may have to be utilized in the real event]....
The point I would like to discuss is...what guidance, input and feedback can we in the industry, provide each other to prevent [minimize] avoidable accidents such as this occurring.
A while ago, I suggested that Pprune via Heliport could assist in a medium to allow the exchange of ideas, standards, techniques together with the personal gotcha's of our collective group.
Put together, the database of this information would fill many books I'm sure....but is not documented anywhere.
Unfortunately there was not sufficient interest in such a view............however there is a lot that can be gathered by such open discussion.
Will we give in a try here????
Hydraulic failures may be a good start........
Edited....To say thanks to Blender Pilot for hosting the picture...Thanks.
http://homepage.mac.com/helipilot/PPRuNe/412crash.jpg
Counterproductive in the terms of not being benificial as a training tool, due to the "skill" not being able to be sufficiently demonstrated and practiced as you are outside the safety and performance aspects of the aircrafts envolope, and hence there is an area within the exercise that is "Talked" about but not performed, therefore a false sense of achievement or knowledge is consolidated.
Also counterproductive with the extreme costs involved when something goes wrong. This cost is not only in $$$ terms [which is the easiest to handle] but also in the security of the organisation and the welfare of all that depend on the monthly paycheck [paycheque].
Also the damage it does to the individuals involved, I am not referring to physical injuries [in which I understand no one was hurt in the attached picture] but the memory and apprehension that each pilot will take with them on each flight forever more.
And finally [and this is the main focus of my post] but more specifically to the discipline of Checking and Training in general.
Take the attached as an example.....obviously someone went wrong.
From third hand information, an Hyraudlics #1 failure was being practiced in the hover!..[not an unreasonble exercise, considering that an offshore platform may have to be utilized in the real event]....
The point I would like to discuss is...what guidance, input and feedback can we in the industry, provide each other to prevent [minimize] avoidable accidents such as this occurring.
A while ago, I suggested that Pprune via Heliport could assist in a medium to allow the exchange of ideas, standards, techniques together with the personal gotcha's of our collective group.
Put together, the database of this information would fill many books I'm sure....but is not documented anywhere.
Unfortunately there was not sufficient interest in such a view............however there is a lot that can be gathered by such open discussion.
Will we give in a try here????
Hydraulic failures may be a good start........
Edited....To say thanks to Blender Pilot for hosting the picture...Thanks.
http://homepage.mac.com/helipilot/PPRuNe/412crash.jpg