PDA

View Full Version : Cathay to Suspend Pax Flights in May?


Airbubba
13th Apr 2003, 05:15
Cathay May Halt Passenger Flights in May

Sat April 12, 2003 01:39 PM ET

By Rico Ngai

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Cathay Pacific 0293.HK , Asia's fourth-largest airline, is considering grounding all passenger flights next month as a deadly virus sweeping through Hong Kong scares away travelers and threatens the airline's survival.

The drastic measure being considered by Cathay, facing the worst crises in its history, comes as Asian carriers cancel hundreds of flights because tourists and business people stay at home, terrified of contracting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).

An internal Cathay memo, sighted by Reuters on Saturday, showed the airline expected passenger numbers to shrink to less than 6,000 per day -- a fall of 80 percent from normal times.

"We forecast that the number of passengers could fall to less than 6,000 per day in May in which case we will have to consider grounding the entire passenger fleet," Nick Rhodes, Cathay Director of Flight Operations said in an internal Internet posting sighted by Reuters.

Hong-Kong's Cathay is currently carrying less than 10,000 passengers per day compared to the usual passenger levels of more than 30,000, Rhodes said in the grave memo.

Cathay issued a public statement later saying it "has no plans as of now to stop operation at any future date." It did not say whether it has plans to cancel all flights if passenger levels continue to deteriorate.

"This is an internal memo and I will not discuss it publicly," a Cathay spokeswoman told Reuters, referring to questions on the content of the memo.

SARS TOLL MOUNTS

The highly contagious pneumonia-like disease has already killed 120 people and infected more than 3,100 people around the world as the virus hitches a ride with air travelers.

The toll has been mounting by the day since a mainland Chinese carrying the virus died in Hong Kong last month before infecting scores of others.

Cathay is being especially hard hit because Hong Kong is at the epicenter of the outbreak which is causing tremors throughout the region's carriers.

Thai Airways International Plc THAI.BK , Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) MASM.KL and Singapore Airlines Ltd SIAL.SI on Friday announced hundreds of cancellations. Australia's Qantas Airways Ltd QAN.AX has said it would fire 1,000 staff, or about three percent of its workforce, as it also feels the bug's bite.

Singapore Airlines, Asia's most profitable airline, plans to reduce capacity by almost 20 percent by cutting flights to mostly SARS-affected destinations.

BLEEDING CASH

"We are literally hemorrhaging cash -- approximately US$3 million per day. The current strategy is simply to stem the bleeding and buy time," Cathay's Rhodes said, citing a briefing given by the airline's chief executive officer David Turnbull on Friday.

Rhodes said the airline currently has canceled about 42 percent of its flights and the remaining flights are operating at a load factor of 30-35 percent. Load factor indicates the number of paying customers as a proportion of seats available.

In the public statement, Cathay said: "Despite the current difficult situation...the airline is maintaining its network and providing scheduled services as much as possible."

Among the hardest-hit by SARS, Hong Kong's tourism industry saw a free fall in air travelers getting on and off the tarmac. Luxury hotels record single-digit occupancy rates as the local Airport Authority said about 33 percent of the total number of scheduled flights for April has been canceled.

Cathay, with a turnover of more than HK$33 billion (US$4.23 billion) in 2002, issued its first-ever profit warning on Friday citing adverse impacts by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus and the war on Iraq.

The warning hammered Cathay's shares to their 16-month low, closing at HK$8.95 on Friday. They had lost nearly a quarter of their value in the last three weeks when SARS first reared its head in Hong Kong in March.

Cathay has already stopped all "non-essential" expenditure and it is offering voluntary unpaid leave.

"If there is not a miracle cure for SARS soon and a sudden withdrawal of the WHO advisory against travel to Hong Kong, the cuts are going to have to be deeper," the memo said.

The measures include involuntary unpaid leave and job sharing, it said.

"Whatever scheme is agreed, the company is determined that every employee will share the pain equally. We are all in this together," it said.

"Even if all employees worked for nothing at present, we would still be losing nearly US$2 million per day. Any savings will only buy time," it added.

411A
13th Apr 2003, 10:09
The PRC/HKG authorities have only themselves to blame for not getting a handle on the SARS problem sooner. To deny, then hide the facts....only makes it worse.
Many folks will postpone travel to asia for a long time.

jtr
13th Apr 2003, 10:35
411A posts re Cathay, and doesn't add any inane comments re. the AOA!:ooh:

There is a strange disturbance in the force

0.88M
13th Apr 2003, 16:32
Finally CX management has a legit reason to totally
restructure the whole company and remove the old binding
agreements and contracts..

Airbubba
14th Apr 2003, 00:26
An update:

SARS-Hit Cathay Won't Rule Out Grounding

Sun April 13, 2003 04:01 AM ET

By Rico Ngai

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Cathay Pacific Airways, Asia's fourth-largest carrier, said on Sunday it would not rule out grounding its passenger fleet as demand for travel into and out of its Hong Kong base is devastated by the deadly SARS outbreak.

"If demand falls still further, we will have to respond accordingly. Clearly we can't rule out any particular course of action, but we will respond to circumstances," Tony Tyler, director of corporate development at Cathay, told Reuters.

He was speaking after an internal Internet memo, seen by Reuters on Saturday, revealed that Cathay's passenger numbers could fall below 6,000 per day in May, which the memo said could drive the carrier to consider grounding its passenger fleet.

"The notice that was posted to our staff simply reflected the fact that, if things deteriorated, then we'd have to take appropriate steps," Tyler said, referring to the memo, which was posted internally on Friday.

"We have absolutely no plans to do that" -- cancel all passenger flights, he added...

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=businessNews&storyID=2555211

Poke Guy
14th Apr 2003, 01:37
Revenge time! :cool:

GlueBall
14th Apr 2003, 09:23
Cathay Pacific Has No Plans to Stop Operation
Saturday April 12, 9:32 pm ET

LOS ANGELES, April 12 /PRNewswire/ -- Cathay Pacific has no plans to stop operation at any future date.
Despite the current difficult situation with 42% of the Cathay Pacific schedule cancelled, the airline is maintaining its network and providing scheduled services.

Cathay Pacific has considered a number of contingency measures to maintain its services, preserve cash and minimize expenditure. Some measures already in place include the stopping of promotional and advertising activities. More measures will be implemented as and when necessary. Cathay Pacific will continue to work closely with the Hong Kong community to overcome the current challenges.

moosp
14th Apr 2003, 09:36
The internal memo was "amended slightly" by the DDFO and the offending line about closing the airline removed from it over the weekend. Corporate Comms. must have put in a bit of overtime Saturday...

Just shows that if you don't want it on Reuters, don't write or say it even if you are quoting the boss.

Detour
14th Apr 2003, 10:25
12 April 2003 - Cathay's Press statement:

Cathay Pacific has no plans to stop operation.

Cathay Pacific has no plans as of now to stop operation at any future date.

Despite the current difficult situation with 42% of the Cathay Pacific schedule cancelled, the airline is maintaining its network and providing scheduled services as much as possible.

Cathay Pacific has considered a number of contingency measures to maintain its services, preserve cash and minimize expenditure. Some of these measures are already in place such as stopping all promotional and advertising activities. More measures will be implemented as and when necessary. We certainly hope the situation will improve soon. Cathay Pacific will continue to work closely with the Hong Kong community to overcome the current challenges together.

---------------------------------------------------

Although they have withdrawn what they said on the internal memo, it sounds like a prelude for bigger and not really better things to come. It's a 'cushioning the blow' tactic, I believe.

Ignition Override
14th Apr 2003, 11:39
This question is not posed out of any disrespect for the victims of the disease or their survivors. I'm simply curious about cold statistics on various dangers to people.

Aren't many more people killed each year, around the world, by either snakes or pigs (never mind the thousands of car accidents, with or without cell-phone use...), although few of these cases might happen in towns or cities?

Good luck with the toxic rumour mill, Cathay Pacific.:ugh:

christep
14th Apr 2003, 13:58
IO

I haven't the time or data to analyse the whole world, but some detailed & updated numbers for Hong Kong are here:

http://home.so-net.com.hk/~pns/

Roughly, over the last month in HK since this broke about three times as many people have died from SARS as you would expect from transport accidents in the same period.

But on the other hand roughly 6 times as many people would be expected to die in that period from "typical" pneumonia as have died from SARS.

Which means the risk is still very low it is not igsignificant. What has changed in the last 2 or 3 days is that younger, previously healthy people are now starting to die from it. Whether this is because they sought treatment too late is still open to debate.

jungly
14th Apr 2003, 14:48
Can you justify that comment? According to the SCMP the last 2 victims have been 79 & 80yo. The 80yo chap had heart disease too.

According to my research to youngest victim was a 39yo Dr.

Tough times at CX but at this stage EVERYTHING is speculation.

christep
14th Apr 2003, 15:35
Is it me that you are asking to justify? Which statement? If you meant the latest victims then I take my data directly from the Health Department press releases.

Everything I have written here is backed up by the data at the my site which I linked above; it includes a list of the age, sex and previous medical condition (if known) of all the 40 victims to date. The site also has links to the source data.

None of what I write is speculation - I leave that to the likes of the SCMP which you seem to regard as the fount of all wisdom, but which I feel is in no small part to blame for the current panic. My site contains facts and factual, verifiable analysis. Please take the time to read it and the sites linked from it before dismissing it out of hand.

jungly
14th Apr 2003, 19:42
No mate not you....Looking at the timings I think we all replied to Airbubba at the same time.

I agree with your sentiments entirely

Chimbu chuckles
14th Apr 2003, 20:36
A Doctor, who happens to be a old friend of my Uncle, was interviewed on a Sydney radio station today...he's a Virologist or whatever the specialist label is for this sort of bug.

He's simply dismayed at the level of panic caused by media and Govt alike over what is, essentially, nothing.

One statistic he used was 35000/annum die of Typical Flu in the US...think about that !!...it's nearly 100/day, every day, week in and week out, year after year.

What are we up to now...200 spread over Asia and North America in the last several months...even if it was 2000 is it worth the reaction being ellicited by frenzied Media bored with the war?

Australian 60 Minutes report last night drew direct comparisons with 1919 Flu pandemic and the Black Plague...suggesting 747s are the rats of the 21st century

They ask Doctors who have been working around the clock and who are exhausted leading questions get the sort of emotional answers which lead to panic, and do so with no thought other than to ratings.

What price freedom of the press?

40 million people died of Flu in Europe over something like 2 years just after WW1...that's 55555/day...in a period in history before anyone understood personal hygene and before antiviral drugs were invented.

Where's the comparison??

A few times every century a bug comes along and knocks off a chunk of the population...this, in the Doctors professional opinion, is not one of those.

Chuck

HotDog
14th Apr 2003, 21:08
Couldn't agree more Chimbu. [But one f, two s];)

Airbubba
15th Apr 2003, 00:53
Another "The End of the World as We Know It" article:

Cathay fights Sars for survival

14/04/2003 16:54 - (SA)

Hong Kong - Leading Asian airline Cathay Pacific has been dealt a devastating blow by the Sars crisis, but analysts believe it will survive, despite massive cutbacks and a deeply shaken corporate psyche.

As demand for tickets to and from Cathay's base in Hong Kong has collapsed, the airline has cut more than 40% of daily flights. The airline says passenger numbers are down one third from last year, although media reports put the figure as high as 80%.

Aviation analyst Jim Eckes, managing director of Indoswiss Aviation, told AFP Cathay could see passenger services cut by at least 50% if the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome epidemic continued.

The Sars epidemic has killed over 130 people and infected some 3 300 in more than 30 countries. In a body blow for Hong Kong, the World Health Organisation issued an unprecedented advisory on April 1 warning against unnecessary travel to the territory and southern China.

Media reported at the weekend that a leaked internal company memo from Cathay's director of flight operations, Nick Rhodes, warned that if the number of passengers fell below 6 000 in May, the airline would have to consider suspending passenger flights.

Cathy disputed the report and Eckes said the airline was certainly not doomed by the crisis.

"There has to be a minimum amount of passenger service," Eckes said, adding that passenger flights, even though greatly reduced in number, were needed to protect the airline's franchises.

"If Cathay stops flying, for example, to London, who's to say Dragonair won't jump in and say, 'We'll do it'," Eckes said.

But he called the Sars epidemic "the worst thing to happen to the modern airline industry."

"It's been extraordinarily bad for Cathay, and what's worse is we don't know how much longer this is going to continue," Eckes said. "If this goes on, they're going to have very heavy losses."

He said, however, the airline is extremely well managed, calling it the lead indicator for most airlines. "If Cathay does something they usually do it first ... Cathay can turn on a dime and that's why they've been so successful."

It was only last month, in the aftermath of a dismal showing following the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the United States, that the airline announced record profits.

But the company's celebrations were immediately cut short as Sars began to take Asia in its grip and the pneumonia-like illness was transmitted by airline passengers across the world.

Passenger bookings were "annihilated," Cathay's chief executive reportedly wrote in a letter to staff published by the company's in-house magazine CXWorld, and the airline very quickly began slashing its flight schedule.

As passengers disappeared, Cathay's stock also began to suffer, rapidly falling in value in mid-March from around HK$11.50 (US$1.47) to HK$8.40 at closing Monday.

The last month "has been quite dramatic," said Cathay spokeswoman Rosita Ng, who said the corporation's outlook had "changed totally" from the rosey view of a few weeks ago...

http://www.news24.com/News24/Finance/Companies/0,,2-8-24_1347590,00.html

GlueBall
15th Apr 2003, 03:10
It doesn't matter what the statistics are. The big dull bulk of people react to perceived notions of fear and uncertainty. And as of today it's still just that. Educated business travellers included, they are not inclined to take to the air unless they absolutely, positively, as a last resort, must travel.
And that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

peeteechase
15th Apr 2003, 04:26
Thoroughly agree Chuck,

100's more will die from smoking (voluntary & involuntary) this year than SARS.
100's more from automobile accidents.
100's more from sex, drugs and rock and roll.

A few hundred in the population of HKG is total pants!!

Get real, people!!

ATB, PTC

Detour
15th Apr 2003, 09:43
It is true that many more die annually due to smoking / accidents/ typical pnemonia..., but they dont fill up all the hospital beds at the same time.

- All the ICU units in HKG are at a maximum capacity.
- The healthcare system is at the brink of collapse due the sudden load, the huge percentage of infections within the healthcare community and increased cost due to the prevention measures.
- The absence of a definitive cause, diagnostic test and how it is spread let alone the treatement, makes the people feel rather helpless and understandably anxious.
- The current cure that is being used is a cocktail of very strong antiviral drugs and steroids which has very serious side effects like anemia, birth defects, muscle and joint aches, fast heart rate, fatigue, insomnia, diarrhea, nausea, irritability and loss of libido,hair loss, depression and worsening of pre-existing psychiatric conditions, rash - which often requires discontinuation of the medication. Also, there is no clear evidence on the effevtiveness of this treatment.


Hence, it makes people feel threatened particularly because the threat can't be readily identified.

Ignition Override
15th Apr 2003, 11:30
Chimbu Chukles might have hit the nail on the head, regarding the media.

Without any more dramatic videos from Iraq, the media must be desperate to attract viewers, whether by innuendo, images of ambulances racing up to hospitals....

Regarding danger, just how many of those anxious business passengers, who might be avoiding flights to the Hong Kong area and other Chinese cities, zig zag their way in the driver's seat through heavy traffic with a cell phone stuck to their heads, whether in Vancouver, Sydney, Dallas (TX) or Gig Harbor (WA)? I rest my case.:hmm:

gofer
15th Apr 2003, 17:46
Guys the problems are clear:

It's not the number who die - AIDS, Smoking, Road Kill will still be ahead for a few weeks to come - it's the contageon.

There you are thinking you are fine, just a little cold and light fever maybe... and you talk to your family accross the table, and you stop at the news stand and catch a train to work and spend some toime in the office (with all the colleagues who you talk to, and perhaps go and have lunch somewhere and shop and go home. What is the betting in that possible late incubation phase how many people you can infect - the statistics say each person can infect 40 per day without trying.

Try making a list of all the people who you spoke to face to face who were less that 10 feet from you say 'yesterday' or tuesday of last week... Also note everwhere where you were.... where you might have spat, discarded a tissue, been to the toilet, put cutlery into your mouth.... No can do, correct... Well therein lies your "hidden risks of proliferation at this time.

I'm out of HK since late Friday and in volontary isolation for the next 6+ days... Even then the risks in my environment of passing an infection that is this easy to spread are very high - one has to eat after all and thus come into contact with somebody - either at the supermarket or at home......

Look at the proliferation rates - while authorities are trying to do something (perhaps not that well, but at least some measures have been taken. That's the scare. In the USA they are getting up towards 200 cases - before the end of this month that will be over 1000, perhaps a lot more... That's the real risk...

Grounding the airlines for transportation of all passengers except those who can be "certified to be zero risk" is potentially the only way out to contain this properly... but can our world society live with that .... and not implode.... We will see but a crisis like in the late 20's early 30's is not out of thye question any more.

You may think of me as a pessimist - I would at this time call it a cautious realist. :uhoh:

Detour
15th Apr 2003, 21:45
That is exactly it gofer.

It's better to be safe than sorry. The thing here is that no one even knows for sure how to be safe.

fire wall
15th Apr 2003, 21:58
Gofer, more histeria. If it were so easy to spread then the infection rates would increase exponentially ie day 1 10 infections, day 2 ...300...day3....3000 etc. Clearly this has not been the case.
News reporters love people like you......and the lemmings line up to follow.
And to answer your question....yes I am in HK.

And as an asside, to all of you out there who are of the same thinking as the previous poster(Chimbu Chuckles) expressing his disgust at the way the media has irresponsibly thrown fuel on this fire......write to them and tell them what a bunch of !@#$% you think they are.....when they realise that it could be their bottom line that suffers due lower subscription rates/lower advertising $ then they will take note. Lets see 10 letters aired on 60 minutes on Sunday night and see a change in their reaction....mine is already in the system and will easily be discounted unless more follow. Then start with the SCMP,NY Times, Guardian, Observer, Asian Wall Street Journal.

Get off your arse or get a job in another industry because this will not stop with just CX and Dragonair....this will decimate the whole industry.

www.sixtyminutes.com.au

Do it now.

Pax Vobiscum
15th Apr 2003, 22:06
On a personal note, I'm going to book my summer hols in the far east - you'll never get better rates than this! We are, after all, talking about a disease that's about as dangerous as (and probably less contagious than) measles.

But from a business perspective, what's going to happen in the (hopefully very unlikely) event that one of your staff returns from HK (or Canada?) with SARS. The government health service will close you down for (at least) a couple of weeks, that's what. Bye-bye disaster recovery plan; bye-bye business. That's why lots of places are already requiring staff who've visited 'at risk' areas to stay at home for two weeks before returning to the office. And that's what's killing business travel.

FormerFlyer
16th Apr 2003, 01:06
Gofer - the SARS virus is not airborn so you will have to do a lot more than pop out to the local shop to buy some food to give the guy behind the deli counter SARS.

cheers ;)

FF

Lou Scannon
16th Apr 2003, 03:58
A report in todays papers says that the Hotels in Hong Kong are only achieving a 3% occupancy rate.

No wonder Cathay are having problems.

Chimbu chuckles
17th Apr 2003, 20:58
I sent this to 60 Minutes on the 14th.


How on earth do you compare the Flu pandemic post WW1, the plague and the current SARS problem.

A couple of hundred people have died! A significant proportion of those people had existing chronic illnesses such as heart disease and respiratory problems and/or were very old...some in their late 70s or early 80s.

And yet Tara Brown can draw comparisons with a period in history, before antiviral drugs were invented and before personal hygiene was identified as a health issue, where 40 Million people died of Flu in approximately 2 years post WW1. Do the math people...that's approximately 55500 people per DAY for 2 years. How does that compare with a few hundred WORLDWIDE over a few months!!!

35000 people die in North America each year from Typical Flu...almost 100/day, ever day, year after year!!!

The media frenzy over a Flu outbreak is sending millions broke in Hong Kong and costing airlines Billions.

WHAT PRICE FREEDOM OF SPEECH??

I dispair at the quality of Journalist these days. They get it wrong far more than they get it right and create panic and uncertainty all in the name of ratings. The war in Iraq is yet another example...Govts need to look at Media Laws to save the free world from the CNN effect.

I note tonight on ABC News that a WHO Representative was worried that the Chinese Govt had underquoted the possible number of cases and that it could be as high as "100 or 200"

:hmm: Sure sounds worrying to me.

He also stated that it was essential for China to lift it's game so that when a real crisis comes in the future they will be prepared.

Anyone would think the WHO was dependant on Govt funding:E

Chuck

gofer
18th Apr 2003, 14:17
FF
:{Sorry for my incorrect use of airborn - I should of course have said postillion and contact contageous. The initial precautionless spread of SARS in the early stages in HK - coughing in lifts etc. - seems to me to indicate that there is just a little logic in the use of masks, especially if you are a potential carrier.

FW
:{Sorry that you didn't approve of my expression of a risk... Life is full of risks, until one of them gets you... Then you are just a statistic. The fact that actions have been taken indicates, at least to me, that we could well have had a much more serious situation if actions had not been taken.

And yes I know that that sounds like the journalistic description of an aircraft on approach having "almost crashed", until luckily the pilot managed to land the aircraft in time. And yes I too get frustrated at a lot of the current style of journalism - but what do you expect if they have to compete with an on-line war.

PV
:ok: Absolutely right - holidays in the Far East will this year be the economic delight for those smart enough to take the opportunity, once the SARS outbreak is contained - Could already be the case for Vietnam and Singapore by the looks of things.

slim_slag
19th Apr 2003, 02:18
Glad to see people like christep are looking at this threat using the evidence available at the time, showing understanding of what "risk" is, and not being alarmist like some.

Nothing wrong with opinions, but they should be identified as such. Newspaper reports are pretty much opinions, IMO of course :) Here is an well thought out editorial that comes from a decent scientific journal, i.e. doesn't have to sell copies based upon heresay, rumour, punchy headlines, horoscopes and pictures of girlies with no tops on (not that I'm complaining about that ;) )

New Scientist - Silence is Fatal (http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/sars/article.jsp?id=23900100&sub=Editorial)

christep
19th Apr 2003, 22:57
Thanks for the compliment Slim_Slag.

I am keeping my site http://home.so-net.com.hk/~pns/ updated.

Today we saw the second consecutive day where the net number of people being treated in hospitals in HK for SARS (and the number in Intensive Care) decreased.

Rollingthunder
20th Apr 2003, 18:52
Identified as a coronavirus mutant of the common cold.

Bad News...


There is no cure for the common cold.

CX bookings down to 30% loads. ETC.
Some HKG hotels at single digit occupancy.
Toronto and Vancouver hotel bookings down 50%.
The largest ER (A&E - Brit translation) hospital in YYZ considering total Quarantine - second hospital to do so. Surgical mask makers reap fortune. Airlines adjusting recirculated air in-flight. Some. Pax health checks on departure and arrival.
Worse than Iraq?

christep
20th Apr 2003, 19:24
Good news

For the third day running the total number of people being treated in hospital in HK for SARS decreased. 409 people have now recovered and been discharged.

Full details (now with graphical summary) at http://home.so-net.com.hk/~pns/

mainfrog2
21st Apr 2003, 01:00
What I can't understand about this is that people have arrived from the far east to the UK, Canada etc. and they have been diagnosed with this SARS virus but we aren't seeing clusters of people suffering from SARS who came into contact with them.

Maybe the climate in Canada or the UK doesn't suit the virus?

jtr
21st Apr 2003, 10:33
Maybe there is a higher level of personal hygiene in the areas you mention, which inhibits the rapid spread?

christep
21st Apr 2003, 22:49
That's a ludicrous comment. The level of personal hygiene in HK is at least as high as anywhere else I have lived (including UK, Germany, Belgium, Russia, Taiwan, Sweden).

However, on the other hand, the attitude towards environmental cleanliness is a cause for concern.

But the most likely explanation as I see it is that the virus suffers from a high degree of attenuation. In other words, as it passes through each generation of transmission its virulence decreases significantly.

slim_slag
22nd Apr 2003, 01:30
christep,

for a non medic, you have a high degree of understanding. Singapore is the also the most boringly-clean place I can think of, but they have more cases than most.

HZ123
24th Apr 2003, 07:21
There are bright spots to many of lifes upsets. Many Airline Corporate HQ's will view CX's situation with mild satisfaction as it will reduce competition even further. Others can only benefit from CX's misfortune and as one of us said in an early thread it will permit CX to restructure if the situation does not improve soon. A scenario welcomed in corporate HQ's may be CX's.

wilco77
24th Apr 2003, 14:22
Look guys dont get too worked up about SARS. As long as u are in the west u will never get it. Only the Chinese in the west will get it.
This is a CIA american plot to deviate the worlds attention from the war so the world does not ask questions like

"HAT HAPPENED TO THOSE CHEMICAL WEAPONS THE AMERICANS WERE LOOKING FOR IN IRAQ, AND THE PROOF THEY SHOWED TO THE UN TO JUSTIFY ATTACKING IRAQ"

Its just a plot by CIA,just like they light up forest fires around the world to destroy asian economies as well as get cows mad to call it Mad cow disease so Europeans and the world only buys their beef!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


THINK ABOUT IT GUYS
DONT LET THE AMERICANS FOOOL YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pax Vobiscum
25th Apr 2003, 00:40
Identical post from wilco77 on the other SARS thread - I echo the request made to modbods there to remove it. My personal spam filter throws anything with more than two consecutive exclamation marks straight into the bin (works for me :D ).