Lu Zuckerman
4th Mar 2003, 00:20
To: Heliport
quote: From Mr. Kenyon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have to say, Frank Robinson never shied away from his responsibilty to the industry and ensured the run of R22 accidents was made general knowedge while he set about curing the problem. (I have the NTSB list of 17 by serial and registration number)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what my response that you edited out was alluding to.
You are obviously spring loaded to the reject anything that is written by Lu position. Mr. Kenyon made a statement about Frank Robinson being up front and curing the problem, which to me means it, won’t happen again. The problem is not cured and the loss of control can happen any time. Ever since the FAA took action on this problem both in the emergency AD and the SFAR for training Robinson pilots there have been at least five loss of control incidents and one happened in the UK and the other happened in Ireland. In essence, the fix for this problem is for the pilots not to enter certain flight regimes for if they do they will kill themselves and if they do, it will be pilot error. I don’t have a wild hair across my A** about the Robinson helicopter I just believe that all of the problems would go away if they adapted the Hughes 300 rotorhead or something similar. The problem is in the design of the rotorhead and that is where the problem lies.
I personally believe your opinion about me is based on the bashing I have taken relative to my opinions about the Robinson design and I ask you to research those posts to see who wrote them. Most of the postees had a vested interest in the Robinson as it was the only helicopter they ever flew. I also believe that your opinions were further adjusted by Frank Robinson’s reply to my posts. If you read between the lines you would understand that it was pure bull. His use of the term "we-wa" confused a lot of people and he further said that many engineers do not understand the problem but truth be told he was addressing inflow roll and transverse flow effect which is common to all single rotor helicopters. Any one that flies helicopters knows about it. He addressed the problem as if his rotor design compensated for this phenomenon which is not true. He also confused the situation by stating “if he had used a 90-degree pitch horn he would have encountered severe control problems. With his rotor head design it would be impossible to have a 90-degree pitch horn.
I would strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the problem. Read the NTSB report.
I also take offense to your commenting about the number of experts (2) that participate on this forum. I have been in this industry since 1955 not including six years in the military working on helicopters and as a Techrep for Sikorsky and I have been a consultant since 1968 having worked on the Cheyenne, Apache, A-129, EH-101 and the V-22 as well as the A-310, Canadair –600 ,604, Regional Jet, FD-728 and the Gulfstream G-IV. I was also maintenance manager for Bell Helicopter International over seeing field and second level maintenance for 900+ helicopters. Now with that background I would hope that I have as much expertise in my field that the other two guys have in theirs.
You of all people should be familiar with the term “Rush to judgement”.
quote: From Mr. Kenyon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have to say, Frank Robinson never shied away from his responsibilty to the industry and ensured the run of R22 accidents was made general knowedge while he set about curing the problem. (I have the NTSB list of 17 by serial and registration number)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what my response that you edited out was alluding to.
You are obviously spring loaded to the reject anything that is written by Lu position. Mr. Kenyon made a statement about Frank Robinson being up front and curing the problem, which to me means it, won’t happen again. The problem is not cured and the loss of control can happen any time. Ever since the FAA took action on this problem both in the emergency AD and the SFAR for training Robinson pilots there have been at least five loss of control incidents and one happened in the UK and the other happened in Ireland. In essence, the fix for this problem is for the pilots not to enter certain flight regimes for if they do they will kill themselves and if they do, it will be pilot error. I don’t have a wild hair across my A** about the Robinson helicopter I just believe that all of the problems would go away if they adapted the Hughes 300 rotorhead or something similar. The problem is in the design of the rotorhead and that is where the problem lies.
I personally believe your opinion about me is based on the bashing I have taken relative to my opinions about the Robinson design and I ask you to research those posts to see who wrote them. Most of the postees had a vested interest in the Robinson as it was the only helicopter they ever flew. I also believe that your opinions were further adjusted by Frank Robinson’s reply to my posts. If you read between the lines you would understand that it was pure bull. His use of the term "we-wa" confused a lot of people and he further said that many engineers do not understand the problem but truth be told he was addressing inflow roll and transverse flow effect which is common to all single rotor helicopters. Any one that flies helicopters knows about it. He addressed the problem as if his rotor design compensated for this phenomenon which is not true. He also confused the situation by stating “if he had used a 90-degree pitch horn he would have encountered severe control problems. With his rotor head design it would be impossible to have a 90-degree pitch horn.
I would strongly suggest that you familiarize yourself with the problem. Read the NTSB report.
I also take offense to your commenting about the number of experts (2) that participate on this forum. I have been in this industry since 1955 not including six years in the military working on helicopters and as a Techrep for Sikorsky and I have been a consultant since 1968 having worked on the Cheyenne, Apache, A-129, EH-101 and the V-22 as well as the A-310, Canadair –600 ,604, Regional Jet, FD-728 and the Gulfstream G-IV. I was also maintenance manager for Bell Helicopter International over seeing field and second level maintenance for 900+ helicopters. Now with that background I would hope that I have as much expertise in my field that the other two guys have in theirs.
You of all people should be familiar with the term “Rush to judgement”.