newswatcher
10th Dec 2002, 14:49
Interesting article from the Financial Times(10/12):
"...........at specialist centres staffed by government employees, or at the airbases where the aircraft are stationed, using Royal Air Force technicians and private sector contractors?
The question is a sensitive one for 2,500 employees at the government-owned St Athan aircraft servicing and repair facility west of Cardiff. The TGWU general union has warned they could all be made redundant as a result of a BAE Systems and RAF plan. According to Jack Dromey, national secretary, BAE and the RAF want to take away the work of St Athan, and of three smaller facilities run by the Defence Aviation Repair Agency, employing another 2,200.
Fixing jets such as Harriers, Tornadoes, Jaguars and VC-10s where they are stationed seems like a reasonable idea. Flying them to St Athan for the aviation equivalent of a new transmission reduces their availability.
But St Athan has compelling economies of scale. A centre with specialist technicians and equipment is the place for "deep repair" in the same way a hospital, not a health centre, is the place for surgery.
One problem for St Athan is that it looks more like the set of a Battle of Britain epic than a flagbearer for technological efficiency. Built in 1938, the 900 buildings are dispersed across the 1,000-acre site to make it harder for the Luftwaffe to bomb them.
Dara, a government-owned trading organisation with yearly profits of about £20m on turnover of £200m, wants to consolidate through a project called Operation Red Dragon.
A public-private partnership would build a huge £70m hangar for servicing and repairing aircraft in the middle of the airfield. The facility would also, Dara hopes, attract contracts to fix commercial airliners. Surplus land, with help from the Welsh Development Agency, would house private aerospace companies.
Laing, the construction business, last week agreed to build the hangar in return for payments from the income it generates. If Adam Ingram, armed forces minister, signs off Red Dragon's business plan in January, the work should be completed by July 2004.
"The project will happen and it will be great news for Wales," says Andy Hamilton, deputy director of Red Dragon. But ominously for trade unionists, the contract with Laing includes a break clause triggered if Dara ceases to be the main organisation fixing military aircraft.
Also, Red Dragon could be invalidated by BAE and the RAF's ongoing study into wider frontline servicing, which has been subsumed into broader research by consultants McKinsey for the Ministry of Defence.
It seems unlikely, given the politicised character of defence procurement, that the government would cut 2,500 jobs in a depressed area historically loyal to Labour.
But it is probable that Red Dragon will result in efficiency gains leading to a further whittling away of headcount at Dara, which has already reduced numbers by 2,500 to 4,700 over two years. The resulting organisation could prove more attractive to private investors than the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, the government research and development body, whose spin-off has proved tortuous. Steady cash flows inspire a confidence these days that blue-sky thinking cannot."
© Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2002.
"...........at specialist centres staffed by government employees, or at the airbases where the aircraft are stationed, using Royal Air Force technicians and private sector contractors?
The question is a sensitive one for 2,500 employees at the government-owned St Athan aircraft servicing and repair facility west of Cardiff. The TGWU general union has warned they could all be made redundant as a result of a BAE Systems and RAF plan. According to Jack Dromey, national secretary, BAE and the RAF want to take away the work of St Athan, and of three smaller facilities run by the Defence Aviation Repair Agency, employing another 2,200.
Fixing jets such as Harriers, Tornadoes, Jaguars and VC-10s where they are stationed seems like a reasonable idea. Flying them to St Athan for the aviation equivalent of a new transmission reduces their availability.
But St Athan has compelling economies of scale. A centre with specialist technicians and equipment is the place for "deep repair" in the same way a hospital, not a health centre, is the place for surgery.
One problem for St Athan is that it looks more like the set of a Battle of Britain epic than a flagbearer for technological efficiency. Built in 1938, the 900 buildings are dispersed across the 1,000-acre site to make it harder for the Luftwaffe to bomb them.
Dara, a government-owned trading organisation with yearly profits of about £20m on turnover of £200m, wants to consolidate through a project called Operation Red Dragon.
A public-private partnership would build a huge £70m hangar for servicing and repairing aircraft in the middle of the airfield. The facility would also, Dara hopes, attract contracts to fix commercial airliners. Surplus land, with help from the Welsh Development Agency, would house private aerospace companies.
Laing, the construction business, last week agreed to build the hangar in return for payments from the income it generates. If Adam Ingram, armed forces minister, signs off Red Dragon's business plan in January, the work should be completed by July 2004.
"The project will happen and it will be great news for Wales," says Andy Hamilton, deputy director of Red Dragon. But ominously for trade unionists, the contract with Laing includes a break clause triggered if Dara ceases to be the main organisation fixing military aircraft.
Also, Red Dragon could be invalidated by BAE and the RAF's ongoing study into wider frontline servicing, which has been subsumed into broader research by consultants McKinsey for the Ministry of Defence.
It seems unlikely, given the politicised character of defence procurement, that the government would cut 2,500 jobs in a depressed area historically loyal to Labour.
But it is probable that Red Dragon will result in efficiency gains leading to a further whittling away of headcount at Dara, which has already reduced numbers by 2,500 to 4,700 over two years. The resulting organisation could prove more attractive to private investors than the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency, the government research and development body, whose spin-off has proved tortuous. Steady cash flows inspire a confidence these days that blue-sky thinking cannot."
© Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2002.