Joe_K
8th Feb 2024, 09:11
https://www.ft.com/content/4a07770b-0ddf-4f3c-b752-4564794a1e9e
Pay-walled article, but the highlights are:
"On New Year’s Eve 2022, an air traffic controller at Bordeaux airport authorised an easyJet A320 jet carrying 179 passengers to land on runway 23. It had slipped his mind that he had already authorised a small, two passenger aircraft to go to the same runway. The leisure pilot, listening on the radio, reminded air traffic control of his presence. Luckily, easyJet pilots were able to abort the landing just 103ft from the tarmac, avoiding disaster.
(...)
Controllers there had been working to an informal rota, which meant they had completed only about 60 per cent of their officially scheduled hours by the last day of 2022. Only three people were on duty at the time of the incident, when six were on the official rota. The backup controller, the reinforcement in case of emergency, did not even turn up for work. Worst of all, management knew about the practice, but ignored it to maintain “social peace”.
(...) in dissecting the incident, the BEA investigators noted that Bordeaux and most French airports have no “reliable” means to identify which controllers have come into work, how long they stay or what functions they actually fulfil."
Full report seems to be here: https://bea.aero/fileadmin/user_upload/OE-INE_OACI_FR.pdf (In French, looks like an English translation is pending).
The Financial Times article, which is titled "Near-disaster shows EU air traffic control is nowhere near good enough" then goes on to lament the lack of more technology to aid with aviation safety, and the reliance an manual processes. Can't help but think that it shows a certain "more tech = good for business" bias, but ATCOs not showing up for work for 40% of rostered hours and that being tolerated by management is certainly a new one for me.
Pay-walled article, but the highlights are:
"On New Year’s Eve 2022, an air traffic controller at Bordeaux airport authorised an easyJet A320 jet carrying 179 passengers to land on runway 23. It had slipped his mind that he had already authorised a small, two passenger aircraft to go to the same runway. The leisure pilot, listening on the radio, reminded air traffic control of his presence. Luckily, easyJet pilots were able to abort the landing just 103ft from the tarmac, avoiding disaster.
(...)
Controllers there had been working to an informal rota, which meant they had completed only about 60 per cent of their officially scheduled hours by the last day of 2022. Only three people were on duty at the time of the incident, when six were on the official rota. The backup controller, the reinforcement in case of emergency, did not even turn up for work. Worst of all, management knew about the practice, but ignored it to maintain “social peace”.
(...) in dissecting the incident, the BEA investigators noted that Bordeaux and most French airports have no “reliable” means to identify which controllers have come into work, how long they stay or what functions they actually fulfil."
Full report seems to be here: https://bea.aero/fileadmin/user_upload/OE-INE_OACI_FR.pdf (In French, looks like an English translation is pending).
The Financial Times article, which is titled "Near-disaster shows EU air traffic control is nowhere near good enough" then goes on to lament the lack of more technology to aid with aviation safety, and the reliance an manual processes. Can't help but think that it shows a certain "more tech = good for business" bias, but ATCOs not showing up for work for 40% of rostered hours and that being tolerated by management is certainly a new one for me.