View Full Version : 767/ 200 & 300 difference?
Bush Tucker guy
2nd Sep 2002, 03:12
Fellow PPRUNERS how do you tell the difference between a Boeing 767/200 and a 767/300,
Also, is the easiest way to tell the difference between a 737/300 and a 737/400, that the 400 has two emergency exits mid way down the fuselarge as compared with one on the 300 series?
Thanks for the responses in advance
Bush Tucker guy
*Lancer*
2nd Sep 2002, 04:07
The window exits work ok... 1 on a 733/762 and 2 on the 734/763.
Otherwise, the 300 just looks longer! :D
Lancer
Jimmy Pop
2nd Sep 2002, 06:20
The 763 also boasts a tailskid.
GoodToGo!
3rd Sep 2002, 00:03
Lancer, don't some 767-300's have that extra full size door just in front of the wing in place of the dual wing exits?
Cheers!
GTG! :D
Buster Hyman
3rd Sep 2002, 04:39
Okay...here's the short answer;
The -300 is longer than the -200! Simple.
As for the exits, I thought they both had 2 small o/wing exits?
Anyway, the US registered 763's had to have the 2nd main door fwd of the wing for FAA requirements, rest of the world was satisfied with the o/wing ones.
Best way to tell a -400 is the raked wing tip. ;)
Skypatrol
3rd Sep 2002, 06:38
Bush Tucker Guy,
As mentioned before, the easiest way is the overwing exits!
Also, (with regards to the QF fleet):
OGA-OGV: -338's, 2 overwing exits and GE engines (white cowlings).
ZXA-ZXG: -336's, 2 main doors fwd of the wing, 4 doors in total each side with the 3rd being an emergency exit only. Rolls Royce engines (grey cowlings). These ones came from BA, hence the differences.
EAJ-EAQ: -238's, 1 overwing exit, P&W engines (white cowlings). And the fuselage looks unnaturally short compared with the tail/wing size!
Generally most 763's around the world have the 2 o/wing exits instead of the 4 doors.
Hope it helps! :D :D :D
AN LAME
3rd Sep 2002, 06:57
The only standard way to differentiate a 767-200/300 is that the -300 always has a tail skid.
737-300/400: -400 has 2 overwing exits each side and also has a tail bump snubber below the rear fuselage.
Sonny Hammond
3rd Sep 2002, 09:17
AN lame, what about the apparent size difference?
Seems pretty standard to me.
Bush Tucker guy
3rd Sep 2002, 11:15
Thanks for the replies, to further add to the original question what is the story behind the all white 767 (VH-BZI i think, there may even be more than one without the red tail) with only QANTAS logo's on the forward fuselarge. Am i right in saying this is a 767/300?
Buster Hyman
3rd Sep 2002, 11:27
'Tis an ex AN 763, that was never really used in anger by AN. On lease to QF from AWAS, I think. Why spend money on paint when the A330's are coming.
hmm...
3rd Sep 2002, 12:54
The -300 is longer than the -200! Simple.
How do you notice this difference unless they are side by side? :confused:
Bush Tucker Guy. I believe the 767/200 is bigger then the Cessna 150 and smaller then the A380!
Could be wrong? :D :D :D
*Lancer*
3rd Sep 2002, 13:48
The other all-white QF aircraft is VH-NOA I think - they're both wet leased by AWOPS to boost capacity.
Lancer
Ultralights
4th Sep 2002, 01:59
The internal structure is quite different as well, galleys look identical, but will not change between aircraft, mouning hardpoints are all different! engine strut design is different!,
my $0.02 worth.
Buster Hyman
4th Sep 2002, 02:04
I don't think it's too hard to tell the difference. Distance from wing root to fwd cgo door, or windows, depending on config. I guess you need to be a plane-spotter!:p
AN LAME
6th Sep 2002, 07:14
Yes the -300 is longer but the easiest way to tell from a distance with out a sibling to compare with is via the tail skids as the number of doors and overwing exits are dependent on the configuration specified at the time of production. QF -300s don't have the doors forward of the wing;the 'Falcons' with the RB211s do; AN -200s RML & RMK had two overwing exits; the rest had one.