maxpod
8th Nov 2022, 15:48
Hi all,
As a quick introduction, I am currently flying on B737 in a cargo airlines in Europe, and I hold a EASA MPL license (did a cadet training in another airline and changed airline with around 500hrs on type, proof that MPL are not tied anymore to an airline, which is good news).
As far as I understood, once I will get my 1500hrs, I will get an ATPL like any pilot who's been through a standard path (CPL IR/ME), but I will still be restricted to multi pilot operations (which is not an issue for a job in an airline), unless I add CPL privileges on my license.
The thing is: I would like to be a flight instructor (teach PPL basically), I have been through a lot of EASA documents but I have not found a clear answer to my question: will the ATPL unfrozen that I would get after MPL+1500hrs be sufficient to meet the prerequisites for a flight instructor course ?
About the prerequisites, EASA says that an applicant for an FI certificate shall:(1) hold at least a CPL(A); or
(2) hold at least a PPL(A) and have:
(i) met the requirements for CPL theoretical knowledge, except for an FI(A) providing training for the LAPL(A) only; and
(ii) completed at least 200 hours of flight time on aeroplanes or TMGs, of which 150 hours as PIC;
(3) have completed at least 30 hours on single-engine piston powered aeroplanes of which at least 5 hours shall have been completed during the 6 months preceding the pre-entry flight test set out in FCL.930.FI(a);
(4) have completed a VFR cross-country flight as PIC, including a flight of at least 540 km (300 NM) in the course of which full stop landings at 2 different aerodromes shall be made;
I get confused here, since they don't talk about an MPL. I assume then that there's not possibility to be a FI with only an MPL license (am I right ?). But, once the ATPL unfrozen, do I meet automatically these requirements ? Indeed, it says "at least a CPL", but would my ATPL still include a CPL even if it's unfrozen after an MPL ?
One option would be to add CPL privileges on my license and then it's fine, but it would cost an extra 5k euros. Another would be to build up hours until 150 as PIC (I already added PPL privileges on my license) but this would even be more expansive (I currently have around 40h PIC)
I am a bit confused here. From what I understand an ATPL gives you the requirements to apply for a FI course, but I am not sure if an ATPL obtained after an MPL would work as we're technically restricted to multi pilots ops...
If anyones could help me out with that, it would me much appreciated, and would maybe allow me to save some money (in that case I would wait my 1500 hours before being an FI, I am not in a rush for that).
Many thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Max
As a quick introduction, I am currently flying on B737 in a cargo airlines in Europe, and I hold a EASA MPL license (did a cadet training in another airline and changed airline with around 500hrs on type, proof that MPL are not tied anymore to an airline, which is good news).
As far as I understood, once I will get my 1500hrs, I will get an ATPL like any pilot who's been through a standard path (CPL IR/ME), but I will still be restricted to multi pilot operations (which is not an issue for a job in an airline), unless I add CPL privileges on my license.
The thing is: I would like to be a flight instructor (teach PPL basically), I have been through a lot of EASA documents but I have not found a clear answer to my question: will the ATPL unfrozen that I would get after MPL+1500hrs be sufficient to meet the prerequisites for a flight instructor course ?
About the prerequisites, EASA says that an applicant for an FI certificate shall:(1) hold at least a CPL(A); or
(2) hold at least a PPL(A) and have:
(i) met the requirements for CPL theoretical knowledge, except for an FI(A) providing training for the LAPL(A) only; and
(ii) completed at least 200 hours of flight time on aeroplanes or TMGs, of which 150 hours as PIC;
(3) have completed at least 30 hours on single-engine piston powered aeroplanes of which at least 5 hours shall have been completed during the 6 months preceding the pre-entry flight test set out in FCL.930.FI(a);
(4) have completed a VFR cross-country flight as PIC, including a flight of at least 540 km (300 NM) in the course of which full stop landings at 2 different aerodromes shall be made;
I get confused here, since they don't talk about an MPL. I assume then that there's not possibility to be a FI with only an MPL license (am I right ?). But, once the ATPL unfrozen, do I meet automatically these requirements ? Indeed, it says "at least a CPL", but would my ATPL still include a CPL even if it's unfrozen after an MPL ?
One option would be to add CPL privileges on my license and then it's fine, but it would cost an extra 5k euros. Another would be to build up hours until 150 as PIC (I already added PPL privileges on my license) but this would even be more expansive (I currently have around 40h PIC)
I am a bit confused here. From what I understand an ATPL gives you the requirements to apply for a FI course, but I am not sure if an ATPL obtained after an MPL would work as we're technically restricted to multi pilots ops...
If anyones could help me out with that, it would me much appreciated, and would maybe allow me to save some money (in that case I would wait my 1500 hours before being an FI, I am not in a rush for that).
Many thanks in advance!
Cheers,
Max