PDA

View Full Version : Goodbye Essendon.........


Al E. Vator
23rd Aug 2002, 21:17
As reported in yesterdays AGE and todays Financial Review.

How long before aviation is banned altogether?

When you look at London (with Gatwick, Luton, Stanstead etc) you realise how shortsighted thos who try to destroy Essendon are.
==========================
Blueprint for Essendon take-off
Aug 24 Financial Review
Brett Foley

Joint venture partners Becton and Linfox have finally unveiled plans for a $150 million redevelopment of Essendon Airport which will turn the under-used facility into a commercial and technological hub.

Becton and Linfox released the 20-year master plan on Friday, which would divide the 300 hectare Commonwealth-owned site into five specialised business precincts.

The prime land, just 10 kilometres from the CBD and 7km from Melbourne Airport, would house everything from retail to commercial, industrial and distribution space. Becton/Linfox paid $22 million last year for a 99-year lease of the site.

The plan also allows for a large 23ha tract to be shaved from the side of the airport land to provide space to remodel the interchange of the Tullamarine and Calder Freeways. Traffic snarls and accidents have dogged the area.

The Federal and Victorian Governments have yet to decide on funding for the project.

Essendon Airport general manager Tim Anderson said more than a third of the land was vacant, useable and ready to be developed almost immediately following approval.

Essendon used to be Melbourne's major international and domestic destination before airlines began using Melbourne airport in 1971.

Mr Anderson said the level of activity had steadily declined since then and Becton/Linfox wanted to rejuvenate the site by luring businesses from the city and other areas. Talks had been held with a number of potential tenants who had showed strong interest.

"Our excitement with the plan is that since Essendon was downgraded, it has operated without direction. As the new owners, we can revitalise it into a major employment and economic centre," he said.

Mr Anderson said Becton/Linfox planned to centralise most of the sparsely populated existing facilities into the Aviation precinct.

The Bulla precinct would be developed first into a retail and bulky goods area to maximise its long frontage to the Tullamarine Freeway.

Mr Anderson said the English Street precinct, which houses the current terminal, and the Beaufort North precinct would be redeveloped for mixed use, involving commercial office space, light industrial and distribution.

"We want to build low-rise, campus-style office developments with child-care facilities, restaurants, gym and plenty of car parks to attract the larger companies who can't find that space in the city," he said.

He said the Hart and the Wirraway North precincts would be set aside for future development because they were located away from the freeways and with little infrastructure support.

The master plan forecasts aircraft arrivals at Essendon will remain static until 2020, but Mr Anderson said the type of aircraft using the site may change. He predicted more corporate and company use for the airport because of its proximity to the city.

The master plan is open for a three-month consultation period before it is submitted to Federal Transport Minister John Anderson.

Lodown
23rd Aug 2002, 21:47
Al E. Vator,

I'm reading this from a distance, so excuse me if I don't have all the facts. I'm making an evaluation based on the text of your submission only.

The decision seems a good one for the airport, business and aviation operators on first look. There maybe some changes to the runway and taxiway layouts, but it doesn't seem like the airport is being closed down. Airports don't run in isolation, and history proves homes and airports are not a good mix. There is a lot of unused space at Essendon. By carving up some excess space for business, the owners are attracting just the people who would regard the services provided by the airport as a benefit. Airport operators should also benefit in return. Secondly, the owners increase the number of people supporting the airport.

If I haven't got the facts straight, I'm sure someone will correct me, but I'm all for the development as described in the text from the Fin. Review.

B772
23rd Aug 2002, 23:44
I understand plans were circulated sometime ago showing 08/26 being retained. Other features shown included a Hotel and a(small) golf course in the north west corner of the airport

Rich-Fine-Green
24th Aug 2002, 00:11
If a land sacrifice means airport survival - I'm all for it.

That goes for other airports as well.

I just hope that double-glazed windows/insulation is part of any new dwellings - it would be a shame if we had another 'noise tax' in the future.

hmm...
24th Aug 2002, 07:42
Its just he beginning guys.........:eek:

Farwell YMEN, you will always have a special place in my heart!
:( :( :(

high talker
24th Aug 2002, 08:55
Finally something positive about Ymen. I just wish people would remember that the airport was there first And they built around it. It will be interesting to see in 10-15 years time whether they are still trying to close it because there living even closer to it.

Buster Hyman
24th Aug 2002, 13:05
Just think, this article could've been written in 6 months time & it could've been about the defunct Ansett's former properties in Garden Dve or elsewhere!

Oh well. As long as MEB stays open & isn't turned into high density housing for a short term rate gain, I'm okay with it.

Z Force
25th Aug 2002, 02:23
Virgin are moving their operations to Essendon.

Al E. Vator
25th Aug 2002, 08:09
.....no, to Moorabbin.

OZBUSDRIVER
25th Aug 2002, 12:01
A good bit of forward vision here. A corporate park with ready access to an airport has potential. Especialy one so close to the CBD

Checked out Bectons website. No mention at all about closing down EN. All guidelines within airport act.NO residential housing allowed.

http://www.becton.com.au/news/index.html

MrWooby
27th Aug 2002, 00:20
What I would like to know is, how does Essendon operate on 08/26 when Tullmarine is operating on 16/34? For example with a northerly wind ML traffic maintains 2500 till over EN then commences a descending turn for 34 ML. If EN has departures of 26 then surely an a/c climbing out of 26 would conlict with an a/c descending directly overhead. It is just plain stupiduty for someone to buy Essendon airport and think they can operate with only one runway with ML so close.

Buster Hyman
27th Aug 2002, 06:17
Surely, if they intend to improve the Tulla FWY interchange with the Calder, wouldn't 08/26 be the RWY to go, or be shortened? I guess it all depends on the plans.:confused:

B772
29th Aug 2002, 13:50
Mr Wooby, The situation you describe can be managed by ATC if required. It happens overseas, I have even seen an ILS down to 400 ft that serves 2 airports.

Maybe a departure from EN on 08 rather than 26 is a better alternative when 34 at ML is in use, or other tracks for QF and VB onto 34.

Sure there will be some delays to EN traffic and the odd delay for ML 34 arrivals.

You may be interested to know that a USAF C141 departed EN for Hickam AFB on 26 many years ago when 34 was in use at ML.

I remember hearing the departure clearance being 'make left climbing turn to ML omni with maximum rate of climb to 3,000 ft due noise considerations. Expect direct ML Omni to Hickam.

Err..Umm
10th Sep 2002, 07:58
When Essendon has to use 26 while ML uses 16/34 traffic is sequenced.
Arrivals aren't a big deal unless there is a go round off 26. Controllers try to sequence for this possibility.
Departures are another story! Heavy or Meduim weight category aircraft tracking down the 26 Localizer to 2500ft present wake turbulence problems for most traffic out of Essendon and ATC must apply suitable time standards after such traffic has over flown and are cautious when clearing an aircraft for take off once overflying jet traffic is at 2NM west of PLE on the drop to 2500ft.

08 arrivals is a nightmare!!!!

When 08 is used it infringes on airspace not owned by essendon tower and is usually avoided at all costs.
08 departures are OK. but expect a restriction to 1500ft till clear of any traffic on the localizer.

hope this helps!
:D