PDA

View Full Version : BEA flights organisational structure.


tubby linton
10th May 2021, 20:51
I was looking at one of the appendices for the accident of Trident G-ARPI and BEA appear to have an organisational structure based on flights rather than fleets. Among those called to testify are at least five Flight Managers of different numbered flights for the Trident. Would one of you please tell me how this worked and how many flights there were across the airline? I think that this structure continued into the 1980s so when did it disappear?

blind pew
11th May 2021, 06:52
Trident 1 and 2 s were divided into 3 flights, each had a manager, deputy, secretary and an office. Trident 3s iirc had two flights; 4 and 5.
Cabin crew had 8 flights which were organised in a different way with a different combination of routes and aircraft types. Some flew mainly 1s and 2s others mainly 1s and 3s.
It was deemed by BEA management that it was too difficult to fly more than 2 different marks of Trident not that there was much difference! I flew 4 types of DC9 in the 70s including one with a totally different fuel system.
Whilst the idea was to know and help the pilots it was more of a disciplinary set up IMHO and jobs for the boys.
One of my mates applied for the weekend off to get married but when the roster came out someone in the office had ordered that he should work so he swopped off the Saturday but unable to find a swop for the Sunday had to come in for an early morning flight.
rgds Alan

tubby linton
11th May 2021, 17:41
Thank you for the reply which has generated a few further questions.
Did you only fly with people within your flight and could you ask to change flight?
Did each type have their own 1, 2, 3 flight or did the numbering continue from the Trident?
When Northeast and Cambrian were folded into BA did the flights organisation get extended to them?

blind pew
12th May 2021, 14:47
Crews within the 3 flights mixed without any priorities..supposedly our managers would fly with those in his flight to judge us but in reality they just cherry picked the bits they wanted, occasionally one would return to Heathrow and find the captain had been taken off the rest of the day and an office wallah would take over...often when there was a nice meal allowance..pure coïncidence. Did a Gib with Batman who did the trip to visit his barbers from his national service days...probably the most unpopular manager in BEA history, one who disregarded SOP and didn’t know anything about passenger comfort.
Rosters were great and if you found a victim then they just rubber stamped it. After my first child was born I put my rosters on the notice board with all flights up for grabs as I would rather dig the garden than go to work..sacrilege...but also instructed on Condors at Blackbushe in my spare time. Once got close to the 90 day legal limit without flying. Needless to say no one every took my airport standby but the money Med trips went like hot cakes.
The original two types were the flights 1-3; the Trident 3 was flights 4-5.
Was on the VC10 when North East was merged so no idea although great entertainment as most BEA pilots believed that their monitored approach was the dogs, North East and BOAC both had similar and in my view a much better procedure as did SR. The argument continues 40 years on and it’s a great sport suggesting that BEA got it wrong, didn’t do the first commercial blind auto landing and taught the world how to fly. It always goes quiet if I remind them of the accident history.

tubby linton
12th May 2021, 18:47
Many thanks Alan. I must go and read your book again. Standard Airbus SOP doesn’t include monitored approaches.

blind pew
13th May 2021, 12:21
As you know there are many ways to safely operate an aircraft which all hinge on training standards...Monitored approaches can be flown in different ways.
With regard to the inquiry I discovered at the Sunderland Trident museum knees up a couple of years ago that there was a lot of potential testimony withheld. Particularly interesting were the two captains that took off around the same time. Key blocked the runway for approximately 5 mins according to them, one on the Viscount asked ATC for a block take off and got airborne before PI and the other waited and took off immediately afterwards. They both speculated at what an intolerable atmosphere there must have been.
I was recently threatened to be taken off from a site after I supported a fellow pensioner who had criticised what I perceived to be racist, misogynistic and Rule British Airways remarks wrt another Asian incident. The guy was our union rep and he accused me of a rant which it wasn’t; I scratched a nerve wrt the inquiry and his input.
Fortunately we have come a long way from those bullying days (to a degree).
Rgds Alan

tubby linton
14th May 2021, 22:02
Perhaps it is time that the Trident accident is re-examined in book form by somebody who was familiar with the operation and the personalities involved.

bean
15th May 2021, 03:30
Needs to be done soon then Tubby. 13 months shy of 50 years

blind pew
15th May 2021, 05:20
Won’t get anywhere as was shown by the National Geographic disaster episode which went as far as changing both second officer’s rank markings to first officer and senior first officer, used just one ex trident pilot who happened to become a manager and special thanks to a non BEA pilot who had been master of the guild. Alongside a load of rubbish they omitted to include the finding of the accident investigators that they had found the simulator pitch characteristics did not match those of the aircraft..not that it would have made a difference to the outcome.
On the thread topic a friend who happened to be an Airbus trainer had previously voiced his concerns to me about the arrogance of AF pilots when they visited Toulouse said that Air France managed to crash every type they operated including Concorde.

blind pew
17th May 2021, 08:44
Judging by your handle you would know the trainer who had flown with Key on the Vanguard. He told me that he was a good operator but developed a nervous tic on the Trident. Key had been the union rep for the Munich disaster and had a lot of agro from many who thought he should have fought Jimmy Thain’s dismissal. I witnessed him the day b4 Staines having another stand up row in the crew room and was honestly shocked; Jerry and I were on a similar standby block but with different times as we were either brown line or similar..memory going. I was on a later airport standby that day and flew with one of the Macs who offered to off load me and take the flack from management. Iirc Key had tried something similar and been rebuffed by management as was normal then and certainly remained so for several months as I refused to fly with Wee Hugh not knowing his history.

Jackonicko
26th May 2021, 21:51
Was on the VC10 when North East was merged so no idea although great entertainment as most BEA pilots believed that their monitored approach was the dogs, North East and BOAC both had similar and in my view a much better procedure as did SR. The argument continues 40 years on and it’s a great sport suggesting that BEA got it wrong, didn’t do the first commercial blind auto landing and taught the world how to fly. It always goes quiet if I remind them of the accident history.

Does that mean that Wiki is wrong when it says that: "The first such landing in a BEA Trident was achieved at RAE Bedford (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAE_Bedford) (by then home of BLEU) in March 1964. The first on a commercial flight with passengers aboard was achieved on flight BE 343 on 10 June 1965, with a Trident 1 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker_Siddeley_Trident) G-ARPR, from Paris to Heathrow with Captains Eric Poole and Frank Ormonroyd."

Was BEA's accident rate any worse than those of its contemporaries?

DaveReidUK
27th May 2021, 05:30
Does that mean that Wiki is wrong when it says that: "The first such landing in a BEA Trident was achieved at RAE Bedford (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAE_Bedford) (by then home of BLEU) in March 1964. The first on a commercial flight with passengers aboard was achieved on flight BE 343 on 10 June 1965, with a Trident 1 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker_Siddeley_Trident) G-ARPR, from Paris to Heathrow with Captains Eric Poole and Frank Ormonroyd."

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/691x579/bea_certificate_small_c82d9fe465a9e71c4f7210971dae6dd5897b46 0c.jpg

blind pew
27th May 2021, 05:45
Iirc The French were the first and to the last question in my 6 years the overall group destroyed 8 aircraft whereas BOAC, AIr France and Swissair’s score was virtually zero.
For the record; Vanguard known corrosion ignored and broke up near ghent; Viscount on air test descended into local mountain; Trident 1C premature slat retraction, Trident 3 mid air; Trident 2 (Cyprus airways) bodged base training, Trident 1E hit puddle and aborted take off at Bilbao; Airtours 707 bodged base training; Airtours 707 heavy landing Heraklion which bent both wings and broke one of the engine pylons then flown back with passengers despite engineer refusing to sign it out.

Jackonicko
27th May 2021, 20:46
Interesting. So where's the evidence supporting the French being first? In what, where and when?

Your list of accidents looks like 71-77, ish!

Air France had endured an even more torrid time in the 1960s.12 September 1961

Sud Aviation SE-210 Caravelle III (F-BJTB, Air France Flight 2005) crashed when the Captain misread his instruments near Rabat's airport killing all 77 on board.



3 June 1962

A chartered Boeing 707-328 (registration F-BHSM, Air France Flight 007) crashed at Orly during takeoff, the wingtip hitting the ground as a result of a faulty servo. 130 killed, two flight attendants sitting in the rear section of the aircraft survived.



22 June 1962

Boeing 707-328 (F-BHST, Air France Flight 117), crashed into high ground while attempting to land at Pointe-à-Pitre in Guadeloupe, killing all 113 on board.



5 March 1968

Boeing 707-328C (F-BLCJ, Air France Flight 212) crashed into the southern slope of La Soufrière Mountain, on approach to Le Raizet Airport, killing all 63 on board.



11 September 1968

Sud Aviation SE-210 Caravelle III (F-BOHB, Air France Flight 1611) crashed into the sea near Cap d'Antibes off Nice with the loss of all 95 on board as the crew attempted to make an emergency landing at Côte d'Azur Airport, following the detection of a fire in the aircraft's rear cabin.



3 December 1969

Boeing 707-328B (F-BHSZ, Air France Flight 212) crashed into the sea shortly after takeoff from Simon Bolivar International Airport with the loss of all 62 on board.

Operating mainly short sectors at an intensive rate, one might expect a higher accident rate? I wonder what the rate was, per 100,000 FH, and perhaps more interestingly, per 100,000 sectors.....?

blind pew
27th May 2021, 21:05
Wrong decade mate...
Our union Rep talking about Air Inter doing manual cat 3 approaches with a proper monitored approach with PNF counting the approach lights followed by missed approach where the threshold was seen (not slant range) followed by a second approach to a landing where they thought the threshold should be.
Did something similar when instructing and getting caught out. Saw the threshold below 100ft. Learnt from that foolishness.
Watched a manual monitored approach to below cat 2 in a DC9 once.
Remember the astonishment that the VC10 had a cat 2 autoland system when I went onto her having believed the myth that only Smiths or something derived from their system could do it and it had to be triplex.
As to number one in Europe - I was astonished by the number of Brits who flew with SR when I joined, as we did the meet and greet I was able to ask why? Gave that up pretty quickly.

WHBM
27th May 2021, 21:17
Interesting. So where's the evidence supporting the French being first? In what, where and when?
The French were indeed first with an Autoland with pax, a Caravelle of Air Inter on Paris to Lyon, a trunk route plagued with winter fogs at both ends. I've got the dates buried somewhere. The Caravelle Autoland had a different design philosophy to the Trident's, but both worked equally well. Development of the two systems was going on at the same time.

Once the system was cracked Hawker Siddeley felt the task was complete, and by the mid/late 1960s offered little onward work to the development engineers. This was at the time that design work on the Lockheed Tristar was getting going, and a number of the team went over there (and were cited by Prime Minister Harold Wilson as examples of the "Brain Drain"), where at Palmdale they not only got it going but put everything in that Hawker Siddeley said they didn't have the budget for. Apparently the Lockheed Tristar Autoland has never been beaten before or since for operation - the Lockheed test pilots said they got it up to a 55-knot crosswind, but when it came to certification couldn't find one severe enough to demonstrate.

flash8
27th May 2021, 21:48
Key blocked the runway for approximately 5 mins according to them, one on the Viscount asked ATC for a block take off and got airborne before PI and the other waited and took off immediately afterwards.I was always under the impression it was a much shorter time, not that now, we'll ever know why,

DaveReidUK
27th May 2021, 22:18
The French were indeed first with an Autoland with pax, a Caravelle of Air Inter on Paris to Lyon, a trunk route plagued with winter fogs at both ends. I've got the dates buried somewhere.

I'm pretty sure it wasn't. I'd be interested to know what date you have for that.

WHBM
27th May 2021, 23:33
I'm pretty sure it wasn't. I'd be interested to know what date you have for that.
It needs a bit of clarification

First Auto-flare with pax by BEA Trident : 10 June 1965 (the one referenced above).

First full Autoland with pax by Air Inter Caravelle : 2 March 1967
First full Autoland with pax by BEA Trident : 16 May 1967

but all of these were in CAVOK conditions (bit of a cop-out then).

First Cat 3 Autoland in actual Cat 3 conditions with pax by Air Inter Caravelle : 9 January 1969 (along with much of the rest of that day's services at Lyon).
First Cat 3 Autoland in actual Cat 3 conditions with pax by BEA Trident : some time in 1972.

The Caravelle, with a Sud-developed system, did seem to be generally ahead. They did the first jet Autoland as well, back in 1962.

What really dismays me is, following all this work to make the BEA trunk short-haul services reliable in winter, when fogs come down nowadays such is the complete tightness of normal slots at Heathrow that with the reduced landing rate Cat 3 imposes, the widebodies continue to come in while it's always the BA flights to Glasgow/Edinburgh etc that are the first to be dumped - the very flights that all the Autoland development work was done for.

DaveReidUK
28th May 2021, 06:31
Thanks for that clarification.

Some milestones quoted from a PPRuNe post about ten years ago:

Caravelle 01 made the first automatic landing on 29 September 1962, thus becoming the first jet airliner in the world to accomplish this feat.

Sud Aviation could offer an automatic approach system to its customers with delivery in the second half of 1963—making the Caravelle the first airliner in the world capable of automatic landings in routine commercial service.

25 September 1964: Caravelle became the first commercial aircraft certified for Cat II minima. French certification (followed by other authorities) restricted automation to 50ft above the threshold, followed by a manual touchdown. Auto-flares could not be made in passenger service, although these were permitted on training flights.

3 March 1964, following ten landings at Bedford and Hatfield with a duplex system, Hawker Siddeley could claim that the Trident had made the first fully automatic landings—made by an airliner designed at the outset for his type of operation. On 10 June 1965, BEA made the world’s first auto-flare in passenger service, when a Trident landed at Heathrow from Paris-Le Bourget (in fair weather).

2 March 1967, the SGAC gave approval for Cat IIIA autoland operations with the Caravelle, the first commercial aircraft in the world to achieve that distinction and, thanks partly to its low wing loading and benign flare attitude, the only one ever certificated to that minima with a single-channel autopilot.

(Another carefully worded ‘first title’ came from Pan American, which claimed the first fully automatic landing in all three axis in scheduled passenger service on 27 February 1967, when a Boeing 727 landed at New York-JFK inbound from Montego Bay. The aircraft was equipped with a duplex system and the ILS was Cat I. At the time, the only airport in the USA with a Cat II ILS was Chicago-O’Hare. This event pipped BEA at the post. On 16 May 1967 a Trident made the type’s first auto-touchdown (with a Smiths duplex system) in passenger service, on a Nice–Heathrow flight.)

and, on 9 January 1969, a Caravelle made the world’s first automatic approach and landing by an air transport aircraft in commercial service and in actual Cat IIIA conditions (RVR 200m, ceiling 20m). On the same day, seven other automatic landings under Cat IIIA conditions were made by Air Inter.

(In comparison, BOAC received Cat II approval in 1969 for the VC10 with the Elliott system. BEA introduced full Cat II operation with the Trident in winter 1970/71; the first Cat III ILS equipment was not installed in the UK until 1968. Approval for Cat IIIA (RVR 200m/DH 12ft) was given to the BEA Trident fleet in 1972. With the Trident, BEA did not achieve Cat IIIB until 1975.)

The BEA certificate I posted does indeed used the term "automatic touchdown" rather than "autoland" - AFAIK the claim that BEA were the first to do that with pax has never been disputed.

WHBM
28th May 2021, 07:10
And thank you for that; I think it was actually what I based some notes I made at the time on, which also incorporate some dates from a Caravelle book (in French), which of course gives a notably partial view :)

Interesting about the Pan Am 727 in USA, which is not so well known. I have seen "carefully worded" statements elsewhere, such as the BEA one being "the first triple-redundant automatic landing", which of course it would be.

I wonder what the distinction between autoflare and autoland is.

As well as the certificate, BEA and then BA apparently used to give a "gift" to all pax who experienced and autoland - a tie for the chaps and a scarf for women. Not handed out at the gate like the inaugural flight, you had to send away for them if the captain announced it. They turn up on e-Bay from time to time. I've never seen one.

blind pew
28th May 2021, 09:52
Flash I’m only repeating what the guys said a couple of years ago and how neither were asked to attend the lane inquiry despite their written submissions. The Viscount skipper with whom I was to fly with several times on the gripper asked for a block take off after it became apparent that Key wasn’t going to roll anytime soon. If you were on the trident fleet then you would know whom I’m talking about.
WHMB..There was much discussion about the guys who jumped ship and how much more practical the Tristar system was. Incidentally I was invited by Peter Hearne to a BBQ at his french home after we had been rock polishing in the Alps where we had a very stimulating discussion and he revealed his roll with Smiths amongst other flight systems. We touched on the Russian artificial horizon and how more natural it was; this was before an ex Aeroflot pilot rolled one of Crossairs kites inverted and stuck it in the ground at Rumlang. Peter was trying a new thermal centering vario out, the centris, which was way ahead of the game then but is common place now. His obituary was interesting but have no links ..could have been posted by the Guild.

Discorde
28th May 2021, 10:17
Perhaps apocryphal, perhaps an embellishment of the truth . . .

In the early days of BEA autoland operation a Trident is inbound to LHR, which is stubbornly below limits for Cat I ILS, with little improvement likely for a while. The three pilots find––a rarity––that not only are all of them autoland certified, but so is the Gripper's autopilot. So they carefully brief themselves on the procedures and calls required.

Checking in with London Airways (as it used to be) they are instructed to maintain FL350 and call entering the hold at Lydd. So they play their master card, announcing their special capabilities and requesting descent for an approach and autoland.

'Roger, Bealine, the RVR is now 700 metres and you're number 17 in the landing sequence.'

blind pew
28th May 2021, 14:11
Had the opposite flying with an ex Luftwaffe starfighter always minimum fuel skipper from a london night stop back home to Zurich. Left him to the planning whilst I went to Smiths to buy a load of mags for the mrs and the Sunday sport. Looked at the planning whilst strapping myself in and yet again minimum fuel in spite of prob temp below minimum as well as our alternate dodgy. His dad had a cannon shell go through his head whilst approaching to land in a Focke wulf 190 courtesy of a septic.
As often happened sunrise saw a thickening of the fog and we got reduce to minimum speed expected approach time xxxx which meant we were off to Stuttgart soon. Luckily the fog thickened which closed the airfield to most of the other traffic so I stated our capabilities and we were taken out of the hold for a direct approach. I didn’t mention it and after that we got on well, so well that he later gave me the only flight that we were to do to Caracas and when I asked for a visual from 12 grand downwind he just sat and watched...dropped down onto the glide slope from above and spooled the DC10 engines up at 700ft.
and you tell that to the youngsters and they won’t believe you..manual of course and no flight director...
PS I even flared it properly and didn’t fly into the runway.