Has flying changed forever?

[DeltaT]

Worthy of a view, this News article (https://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/start-here/2020/07/flying-changed-start-200719070615228.html) gives a good overview at the moment . 8mins


And also this
Window seats not the best it would seem
sneeze simulation

[slats11]

Changed for a very long time.
Some sectors likely changed for good. Numerous domestic flights each day filled with workers flying interstate for few hours of meetings will appear as quaint as ... kids blowing out candles on a birthday cake.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1372x984/screen_shot_2020_07_15_at_19_46_52_69cf4edfe6da0c71ed2819919 39de662a45098cd.png



Latest CDC death figures show USA deaths are falling faster than they are being reported.

There is a difference between death reported and death occurred.
Most deaths reported in the past week (i.e. the week between July 4 and July 11) were added to previous weeks back in April and May.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1810x926/screen_shot_2020_07_19_at_23_56_12_e152c13c89863378886b552f9 ef11d92e95977ae.png
Blue = deaths by week occurred as of WE July 4
Red = deaths by week occurred as of WE July 11.

So CDC recored 6,698 additional deaths in that week. But only 5% (338) of these occurred in the last week.
Of course, next week more deaths will be added to the WE 7/11.
As of 7/4, there were 177 deaths recorded in that 7/4 week. As of 7/11, there are a total of 643 deaths in the WE 7/4 (a further 466)

This CDC data is based on death certificate data It is the most reliable data (although even that has problems - England particularly it seems). However it can take many weeks for cases to filter through the system and get recorded and then get added to the appropriate week.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/COVID19/index.htm

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1642x590/screen_shot_2020_07_20_at_11_59_35_5a99a2ba3db11d2ed3943301a 859a1494b2ff529.png

[ozbiggles]

Nothings changed, Lift still = Cl x 0.5 (p x p)s

[dr dre]

Changed for a very long time.
Some sectors likely changed for good. Numerous domestic flights each day filled with workers flying interstate for few hours of meetings will appear as quaint as ... kids blowing out candles on a birthday cake.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1372x984/screen_shot_2020_07_15_at_19_46_52_69cf4edfe6da0c71ed2819919 39de662a45098cd.png



So the graph you posted says 20-25% of Aussies were planning (not just wanting) to take a domestic flight within 3 months of restrictions lifting. Extrapolated that’s up to 6 million people, and it’s estimated that 10 million Australians take at least one domestic flight per year. So 60% are willing to fly again domestically straight away

Once travel is unrestricted give it a little while for memory of the virus to fade away and the other 40% will start to come back. Australians are too used to having cheap and accessible air travel as a part of their lives now. Once fears of the virus subside then the demand will return.

As far as the OP and sneezing on an aircraft, literally any space where people crowd together will be at risk.
Will we shun:
Sports stadiums
Weddings
Restaurants
Pubs
Nightclubs
Trains
Buses
Cinemas
Schools
For the rest of our existence?

[LapSap]

Nothings changed, Lift still = Cl x 0.5 (p x p)s

I hope there’s still a V in there !

[ozbiggles]

I hope there’s still a V in there !

The V is AWOL at the moment...can I blame spell check?

[White Knight]

Has flying changed forever?

I doubt it.... The pandemic will eventually be declared over and we'll get on with things!

appear as quaint as ... kids blowing out candles on a birthday cake.

All the kids I know still do:D They're not all junkies by the age of ten you know!

[slats11]

So the graph you posted says 20-25% of Aussies were planning (not just wanting) to take a domestic flight within 3 months of restrictions lifting.

Yeah.

But that was 3 months after a minimal 1st wave that was quickly contained as it mostly involved returned travellers. I suspect this outbreak will be harder to get under control and will do more damage.

Then add the loss of disposable income when jobs don’t come back, when job keeper gets pulled, and when mortgage holidays come to an end.

This is not a short term blip in a graph. This is deeply entrenched structural change.

[Sunfish]

Unfortunately the change is permanent. We don’t know where it will end up, but we ain’t going back to 4000 pax cruise ships rocking into Venice or long weekends in Bali. or A380 dumping pax in Dubai for onwards connections.

To pine for What it is tempting to call “the good old days” is a waste of time We need to engage with what people want and try and deliver.

As a potential passenger, My gut feel is I can’t afford another business class ticket to be dumped at a hub in Frankfurt, LHR, etc., then dick around getting domestic flights. What might work is direct flights to destinations close to where I want to go - much more targeted and specific. However I’m dreaming. I probably won’t see Venice, Amalfi, Split, Sardinia ever again.

[manchi83]

Hey Mate,
We are definitely in the middle of the storm and it's hard to make predictions when we are in it, although we have some clues. You'll see Venice again, just hung in there!
It might take a while, air travel growing trend might have been interrupted but it will recover again. 9/11 is a good example of this.
I wish all the best to all the aviation community!

[White Knight]

Unfortunately the change is permanent. We don’t know where it will end up, but we ain’t going back to 4000 pax cruise ships rocking into Venice or long weekends in Bali. or A380 dumping pax in Dubai for onwards connections.


Rubbish. People have short memories once the media frenzy moves onto something else. It may take a while, but it ain't permanent!

[Momoe]

Hmmm, this isn't just about folk getting on planes.

Working from home productively and virtual meetings are game changers, virtual meetings will reduce the need to travel, not eliminate it entirely but IMO will impact business travel which is the cash cow for a lot of airlines.
Working from home reduces the need for office space, this will be reflected in reduced values in commercial property, investors will take their money elsewhere and it's unlikely to be in leisure or travel related industries,
that's not even factoring in all the folk who haven't got a job as a result of Covid19.

Also, this is by no means over; globally the number of people with Covid19 is increasing. Even if flights were available, who would go to Mexico at present?

[Sunfish]

In addition Momoe, “working from home” frees people from the need to be geographically close to a city office, plus people are going nuts cooped up in city apartments.

‘’This is already translating into people moving out of cities into rural areas. This is a decumented trend. That could mean an increase in air taxi/ very short haul operations between country and city destinations. For example, I’m 3 hours minimum by road from the city but less than 40 minutes by air.

Forget high speed rail as a solution because we don’t have the population density to afford it. A twice daily air service in a Caravan or suchlike would perhaps be viable - if it wasn’t for Australia’s uniquely unfriendly aviation regulation environment.

[Bodie1]

Unfortunately the change is permanent. We don’t know where it will end up, but we ain’t going back to 4000 pax cruise ships rocking into Venice or long weekends in Bali. or A380 dumping pax in Dubai for onwards connections.

I call complete and utter bull****. This will pass like every other crisis. Not only will things get back to 'normal' they'll far exceed the activity of pre-covid.

[Stickshift3000]

I call complete and utter bull****. This will pass like every other crisis. Not only will things get back to 'normal' they'll far exceed the activity of pre-covid.

I agree.

When the media moves on so will the people.

[Cravenmorehead]

A vaccine like the one in development in Oxford will change the ball game. If it or any of the vaccines are successful and rapid distribution happens well........???
A crystal ball would be nice.

[slats11]

Working from home productively and virtual meetings are game changers, virtual meetings will reduce the need to travel, not eliminate it entirely but IMO will impact business travel which is the cash cow for a lot of airlines.

Agree.
The Deloitte survey was about leisure travel
But business travel will be harder hit than leisure
a) businesses will be looking to cut costs. A Zoom meeting looks attractive compared to losing someone for a day and the travel expenses. It won't go to zero, but it will decrease. A lot.
b) you can't use Zoom for a holiday
c) the ongoing risk of air-travel may be worth a 2 week holiday somewhere nice. But less so for a 2 hour meeting in another city.

Leisure will pick up first. But people will be price conscious, and many will downgrade (Fiji instead of Europe, Qld instead of Fiji)

The highest yield seats on a plane are J and full Y, which are often business travellers.
Deeply discounted Y are very low yield, but are the sorts of tickets people will be buying.

There will be exceptions to all the above. Some business travel will continue. And some people will still holiday in Europe and USA in 20201.
But businesses have to look at what most people are doing.

[Chris2303]

Deeply discounted Y are very low yield, but are the sorts of tickets people will be buying.

But they can only buy them if the carriers are offering them

[Capn Bloggs]

And some people will still holiday in Europe and USA in 20201.
That's a pretty brave prediction, Slats11! :E

[V-Jet]

He's correct CB - bang on the money. But 20201 is a VERY long time to wait:)

[slats11]

But they can only buy them if the carriers are offering them
True. But it will be a buyers market. Cash and credit will be king. Sellers can chose to meet the market, or can decide not to sell.
And any airlines that have received generous government support will likely be expected to "do the right thing for the country" and encourage tourism.

That's a pretty brave prediction, Slats11! https://www.pprune.org/images/smilies/evil.gif
Even in 2021, some people will be travelling. Even if holidays are not approved, some people will seek approval as family business (helping elderly relatives arrange affairs) or essential business travel or whatever.

[ruprecht]

“forever” is a long time. :rolleyes:

[Richard Dangle]

It's interesting how people are so quick to hijack the words "change" and "normal". The aviation industry is give or take a century old...wtf is "normal"? Low cost aviation has only been around 30 years. Concorde has been and gone in the last 50. Rich folk who own airlines are trying to make some form of space travel "normal". Hell, 40 years ago dolled up stewardesses in miniskirts were totally standard. You get my drift.

Of course commercial aviation will change, it was going to change anyway without Covid19, there are a myriad of factors - some known, some yet to be discovered - driving such change. How Covid19 will speed-up (or slow-down) such changes is yet to seen. Some are obvious in the short to medium term, some are more debatable, but to suggest that everything will swing back to "normal" is not just myopic in terms of Covid 19 - its requires a complete disregard of the history of the industry you all work in.

Change is part of life, and in aviation it has traditionally been swift, dramatic and far-reaching. The fact that airlines (and the support industries) have globally restructured already, entailing the loss of hundreds of thousands of jobs whilst permanently retiring entire fleets of aircraft, is a little bit of a clue. The fact that the virus and all the various economic interventions are still in full swing whilst they speed ahead with these restructuring plans is an even bigger clue.

The aviation industry is continually changing and it will probably change further and faster as a result of Covid19. Whether it is good change or bad change depends entirely on personal circumstance and values. And there is no normal in this industry...there never has been and there never will.

[flyinkiwi]

But business travel will be harder hit than leisure
a) businesses will be looking to cut costs. A Zoom meeting looks attractive compared to losing someone for a day and the travel expenses. It won't go to zero, but it will decrease. A lot.
b) you can't use Zoom for a holiday


I can state as an IT Professional that video conferencing in various flavours has existed for more than 15 years, Zoom itself is a reasonably mature product (current version is 5.x). It's interesting that COVID has been used as an excuse to reduce business travel when the alternative has been around for a very long time.

[Doors To Manuel]

I have been using video conferencing for meetings for almost 30 years......and that's working for an airline! Remember, Napoleon had thoughts of digging a channel tunnel in the early 1800s.. Yep, some things just take time to catch on!

[ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE]

I can state as an IT Professional that video conferencing in various flavours has existed for more than 15 years, Zoom itself is a reasonably mature product (current version is 5.x). It's interesting that COVID has been used as an excuse to reduce business travel when the alternative has been around for a very long time.

As an IT professional surely you know then that the technology is constantly evolving and getting better.

The laggy, pixulated Skype video conferencing of 5-10 years ago is no where near as good as what we have now, and it’s only going to get better.

[Bodie1]

I can state as an IT Professional that video conferencing in various flavours has existed for more than 15 years, Zoom itself is a reasonably mature product (current version is 5.x). It's interesting that COVID has been used as an excuse to reduce business travel when the alternative has been around for a very long time.

You guys just don't get it, the guys predicting that zoom and the like will take over meetings. It won't, ever, permanently that is. It's like saying zoom will permanently replace family get togethers. It's used as a stopgap. I've been doing some classroom stuff via zoom and it sucks. It is not the same as face to face and never will be.

"We'll all be rooned," said Hanrahan.

[compressor stall]

Maybe the third world NBN speeds that many of us ended up with even in major centres will be the saviour of business travel and a bunch of aviation jobs. Maybe there was a method to the FTTN madness?

[flyinkiwi]

As an IT professional surely you know then that the technology is constantly evolving and getting better.

The laggy, pixulated Skype video conferencing of 5-10 years ago is no where near as good as what we have now, and it’s only going to get better.

The outfit I work for had a Cisco video conferencing suite set up in a board room back in the early naughties. It had it's own dedicated high bandwidth internet link and worked pretty sweetly, the downside being it cost mega $$$ to buy and maintain and you could only talk to sites which had links of sufficient bandwidth to carry the feed. The fact I can now video conference in high definition on my mobile phone over the cellular network astounds me and would not have been possible back in the days of GPRS/GSM/CDMA. Yes the times are a changin indeed...

[Fuel-Off]

Just a little perspective from the outside. I haven't stopped working since the pandemic started (thankfully!) and it would seem that albeit light, passenger demand is still there, especially in Business and First as those who can afford it, wish to socially distance the best they can on aluminium tube.

Re video conferencing, I have quite a few friends in executive level management in companies completely away from aviation. They don't see this way of doing business practical particularly when you're doing multi million dollar deals, you need to see their poker face. And in Asia, face to face business dealings are VERY culturally important. It's a bit hard to do a deal when the kids come barging into the home office or the family cat walks over the keyboard. Just look at the news outlets and when they do interviews via zoom and the like. The interviewee is struggling to hear the questions being asked because the equipment they use is quite inferior to what a studio can provide (or the feed just cuts all together because the kids are using up all the bandwidth on youtube!)

The very same doomsday predictions were made during the 9/11 attacks, the first SARS outbreak and the GFC. Yet aviation prevailed.

Fuel-Off :ok:

[ECAMACTIONSCOMPLETE]

Just a little perspective from the outside. I haven't stopped working since the pandemic started (thankfully!) and it would seem that albeit light, passenger demand is still there, especially in Business and First as those who can afford it, wish to socially distance the best they can on aluminium tube.

Re video conferencing, I have quite a few friends in executive level management in companies completely away from aviation. They don't see this way of doing business practical particularly when you're doing multi million dollar deals, you need to see their poker face. And in Asia, face to face business dealings are VERY culturally important. It's a bit hard to do a deal when the kids come barging into the home office or the family cat walks over the keyboard. Just look at the news outlets and when they do interviews via zoom and the like. The interviewee is struggling to hear the questions being asked because the equipment they use is quite inferior to what a studio can provide (or the feed just cuts all together because the kids are using up all the bandwidth on youtube!)

The very same doomsday predictions were made during the 9/11 attacks, the first SARS outbreak and the GFC. Yet aviation prevailed.

Fuel-Off :ok:

My contention isn’t that post pandemic business travel will evaporate completely. I believe, based on conversations with friends outside aviation who work in the public and private sectors, is that in some organisations, one in every 2 or 3 business trips could be replaced by video conferencing. Perhaps a 10-20-30% reduction overall. Not a doomsday prediction, but not a snap back to pre pandemic levels of business travel either.

[ScepticalOptomist]

What has happened after EVERY single aviation crisis?

The pax with little money stay home, those with some money travel, businesses reduce travel for the finanvial quarter. Then, those with little money stay home until fares are reduced to bargain basement, those with some money start earning their frequent flier points again, and businesses start enjoying the perks of travel again.

The cycle repeats, and life goes on....

[dr dre]

Just a little perspective from the outside. I haven't stopped working since the pandemic started (thankfully!) and it would seem that albeit light, passenger demand is still there, especially in Business and First as those who can afford it, wish to socially distance the best they can on aluminium tube.

Re video conferencing, I have quite a few friends in executive level management in companies completely away from aviation. They don't see this way of doing business practical particularly when you're doing multi million dollar deals, you need to see their poker face. And in Asia, face to face business dealings are VERY culturally important.

I agree that videoconferencing will never completely replace face to face meetings. Business travel will still recover to levels similar to 2019 within time, as will leisure travel, as people physically want to travel and visit people and places and that is so ingrained within the public consciousness now it’ll never change.

The only real threat is the method of getting people there, so I see Australian aviation’s biggest long term threat not Zoom or another pandemic, it will be if Australia ever bothers to build a Brisbane-Sydney-Canberra-Melbourne High Speed Railway. London to Paris air traffic decreased 55%, Madrid to Barcelona 65% after the opening of those respective high speed railways. But that’ll probably take 20 years to eventuate one this country, so I wouldn’t be worrying about it just yet.

[slats11]

No one is saying high yield business pax will go to zero. But it doesn’t have to go to zero to severely damage an industry which depends on these high yield pax.

There will always be a need for some face to face - 1st meetings, major deals, dealing with problems will all require face to face. No argument.

but a lot of routine meetings will be streamed.

[Mach E Avelli]

Agree with above that high yield business travel will severely decline. Those that can afford it will be more likely to charter or own corporate jets. Such will be the pain of mass air travel with additional layers of health checks on top of the already burdensome security nonsense, that many business people will find reason to NOT fly on the airlines.
Once we find a vaccine the Bogans-to-Bali market may well be the first to recover, because yobs will always want to travel to the cheapest destinations.
In Europe, because of their woeful climate, northern nations will look for cheap travel to sunnier destinations for their annual three week getaways. Hence the likes of Ryanair should do OK, but having flown with them once, I would rather walk or swim.

[burned_out]

Given the amount of unemployed Pilots around the world, and the rate of recovery.... AND the stupendous knee jerk reaction to this virus (lock-downs etc) , the WHO f*ck up (Thanks China) and the complete F-Wits involved with "keeping us safe" and getting a lot wrong.... Aviation is doomed for a few years yet....
Only caveat to this is this is a USA election year, so I assume a lot of covid hype will be pushed continuously and not allowing any "positive" news about treatments to come out (especially non-patent ones). I expect a sudden change of heart from media after Nov 3rd depending on the outcome of the USA election.
Funny how the inventor of the PCR test says that the test is not meant to be used like it is for identifying cases! So many please explains!

[dr dre]

Given the amount of unemployed Pilots around the world, and the rate of recovery.... AND the stupendous knee jerk reaction to this virus (lock-downs etc) , the WHO f*ck up (Thanks China) and the complete F-Wits involved with "keeping us safe" and getting a lot wrong.... Aviation is doomed for a few years yet....
Only caveat to this is this is a USA election year, so I assume a lot of covid hype will be pushed continuously and not allowing any "positive" news about treatments to come out (especially non-patent ones). I expect a sudden change of heart from media after Nov 3rd depending on the outcome of the USA election.


Yeah we get it mate, #plandemic.....
It’s all a conspiracy by the deep state to stop Trump being re-elected. His drop in popularity has absolutely nothing to do with him claiming it would disappear by April or it was all a hoax or whatever.
But what would the “so called experts” know with all those qualifications and years of experience, they haven’t been exposed to the truth......

Funny how the inventor of the PCR test says that the test is not meant to be used like it is for identifying cases! So many please explains!

Funny how that entire sentence is total nonsense, nothing more than a debunked internet conspiracy meme. (https://www.aap.com.au/pcr-inventor-who-died-in-2019-did-not-say-his-test-wont-work-for-covid-19-infections/)
Please explain where you get your information on subjects like that from?

[slats11]

May have already infected 500,000 Australians.

Given this was running through China by December, given it hit Europe by December, and given all the movement between China and Australia over summer (University holidays plus Chinese New Year), it would be miraculous if it wasn’t rampant in Australia by Jan and Feb.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/up-to-500-000-australians-may-have-been-infected-nsw-chief-doctor-20200722-p55ec3

[Green.Dot]

May have already infected 500,000 Australians.

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/up-to-500-000-australians-may-have-been-infected-nsw-chief-doctor-20200722-p55ec3

If this assumption is true I can only view it as a GOOD sign that we are already living with COVID-19 as a society. If a vaccine isn’t successful rest assured it won’t be the end of the world after all.

[Xeptu]

If this assumption is true I can only view it as a GOOD sign that we are already living with COVID-19 as a society. If a vaccine isn’t successful rest assured it won’t be the end of the world after all.

For the apparent free world. Maybe Maybe Not, nobody survives a third time infection

[Popgun]

My contention isn’t that post pandemic business travel will evaporate completely. I believe, based on conversations with friends outside aviation who work in the public and private sectors, is that in some organisations, one in every 2 or 3 business trips could be replaced by video conferencing. Perhaps a 10-20-30% reduction overall. Not a doomsday prediction, but not a snap back to pre pandemic levels of business travel either.

This.

Caught up with a few old friends during the week. They work as a senior partner in a major law firm, a senior manager in a multi-national building conglomerate and head of IT services in a very large organisation. The relevant point here is that they all used to travel extensively for business purposes AND they are all responsible for approving travel arrangements for their subordinates.

All three of them were absolute and unequivocal in their statements that the previous volume of business travel undertaken by themselves and their subordinate staff (100s for 2 of them) would not be replicated once travel becomes unrestricted again.

They readily agreed that not all business could be effectively conducted via teleconferencing. However, they assured me that their (and their staff) contribution and service to the Frequent Flyer Army (booted and suited, lounge-dwelling, high-yield, corporate types) would be significantly reduced.

Make of that what you will, but I would put money on it being a LONG time until that part of the aviation market returns to pre-COVID levels. I have no business experience with it but these guys all stated that the technology really has come a long way and certain face-to-face business tasks are replaced via Zoom (or the like) with no apparent disadvantage.

On the flip side of the travel coin, I have had many friends and family say that they are planning 2 or 3 trips to holiday or catch-up with family and friends in the space of time (e.g. 12 months) that they would usually be only planning 1 trip. They did add a caveat to those intentions by stating that while they were uber-keen to take care of their cabin fever, the budget was going to be strictly controlled.

PG

[Sunfish]

I was told minimum of five years.

Before that we will be back to the old yellow health vaccination books or digital equivalent. No vax no travel.

[machtuk]

Fewer and fewer will travel for business, leisure travel will still continue albiet not at the levels pre the China Virus. This one world event has changed the face of the planet as we used to know it forever!

[Ragnor]

Well I would have to disagree with the leisure travel reducing in size, all the flights I have operated this month I have seen 90% and above load factors (yes I work it out every sector I have done). Soon as people get the go ahead from gov and border restrictions ease especially in Victoria there will be demand Aussies love to travel that’s always been a fact.

I have read various articles regarding video conferencing business seem to be displeased with it due to poor quality, drop outs in internet service and other tech issues. They also prefer the face to face meetings but wether they travel business class or not well maybe not in the short term but who knows.

[Vertisol]

Well I would have to disagree with the leisure travel reducing in size, all the flights I have operated this month I have seen 90% and above load factors (yes I work it out every sector I have done). Soon as people get the go ahead from gov and border restrictions ease especially in Victoria there will be demand Aussies love to travel that’s always been a fact.

I have read various articles regarding video conferencing business seem to be displeased with it due to poor quality, drop outs in internet service and other tech issues. They also prefer the face to face meetings but wether they travel business class or not well maybe not in the short term but who knows.

We had some terrible video conference experiences early on but having done 1-4 per day over the last few months we are finding a way to make it work. MS Teams seems to be the most reliable and offer the best video quality.

My job requires me to physically inspect stuff but I would think my domestic travel will be less than half what it used to be once things are 'normal'.

[slats11]

2 large NSW departments. Both expecting much lower business travel in future. Both planning “Zoom rooms” - big screen on wall, sound proofed, good speakers and microphones, fairly comfortable.

This looks like a long term reset - not a short term adaptation.

[slats11]

https://www.wkbn.com/news/national-world/air-travel-not-expected-to-recover-until-2024/

https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2020-07-28-02/

[Themeatfleet]

Internal memo I saw from a mate at HSBC shows a new global mandate of a 70% reduction in travel post virus. Zoom may not be the best way of managing a global business but the dollar savings in shiny lights will be enough to keep it enforced for at least the next few years.....

[Ascend Charlie]

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/840x694/china_air_9f73f894d40f4dfd510a4f3347e86f766cae24f0.jpg
Doesn't seem to be slowing the air traffic in China?

[poteroo]

Those of us looking down the barrel of 80, and who have already cruised and flown near everywhere, are now forced to reconsider our future. Firstly, after 80, travel insurance becomes punishing, and that alone is a massive deterrant. And yes, we have incurred some medical issues along lifes road, and these are now returning to bite us in higher premiums and numerous exclusions. As well, with the cruise ship industry having been clearly shown up as being more concerned with income than passenger safety - we won't be going back there. (17 cruises x 6 companies in 22 years). We recognise that long distance airline travel is becoming more comfortable, and is safe enough - but negotiating huge airports has become quite a difficult event for us. Too much walking gate-to-gate, a rugby scrum at every security checkpoint, and terrible food facilities. Business lounges have fallen to new lows too. What we once thought nothing of enduring - at our age, we just don't want to do it anymore.

Where to now? Well, fly the RV to more distant Aussie locations, drive to the many Aussie locations we've never considered, and do a bit more intra-state travel for weekends. Doing our bit to keep some of the $68b that Aussies used to spend on overseas travel - here in Aussie.

happy days,

[De_flieger]

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/840x694/china_air_9f73f894d40f4dfd510a4f3347e86f766cae24f0.jpg
Doesn't seem to be slowing the air traffic in China?
Be interesting to see how that image compares with one taken at the same time a year ago. Flightradar has some figures here Air traffic at China's busiest airports... (https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/air-traffic-at-chinas-busiest-airports-down-80-since-the-beginning-of-the-year/) which suggests it's currently very roughly 25% down now from where it was prior to the disease outbreaks, but I also wonder about the influence of state control over their airlines, particularly those that the government is a majority shareholder of. It makes me question how much flying is being done there because it's a way to demonstrate to the world, so everyone can look on flightradar and the airport activity statements, and see how well the airline industry and China overall is "recovering" under the Chinese government rule.

[SOPS]

How many people are in those aircraft?

[Ascend Charlie]

How many people are in those aircraft?

At least 2.

[SOPS]

At least 2.


😂😂😂😂

I will pay that!

[White Knight]

Internal memo I saw from a mate at HSBC shows a new global mandate of a 70% reduction in travel post virus.

Doubt it.... Or is your 'mate' only talking about HSBC staff? And I doubt that figure too even if it's just HSBC. For business you cannot compare a Zoom chat with face to face talking. What is it? 85% of conversation is the body language and not the actual words? Besides, when your ISP goes down regularly what then? You just have to look at Virgin Broadband in the UK failing several times recently leaving Zoomers high and dry!

I look forward to digging out this thread in five years from now and we'll see how things have recovered!

[Themeatfleet]

Doubt it.... Or is your 'mate' only talking about HSBC staff? And I doubt that figure too even if it's just HSBC. For business you cannot compare a Zoom chat with face to face talking. What is it? 85% of conversation is the body language and not the actual words? Besides, when your ISP goes down regularly what then? You just have to look at Virgin Broadband in the UK failing several times recently leaving Zoomers high and dry!

I look forward to digging out this thread in five years from now and we'll see how things have recovered!

yes...... mate is only talking about HSBC staff and their business travel hence the internal memo. As I said, A reduction in business travel is something which companies will try and stick to for the first few years while they’ve got the savings in bright lights. Eventually they’ll realise it doesn’t work and the travel will come back. Thinking businesses are going to have the desire and the capital to just charge straight back into travel at the same rate immediately is just ludicrous.....as much as we’d all love that for yields.

[dr dre]

Be interesting to see how that image compares with one taken at the same time a year ago. Flightradar has some figures here Air traffic at China's busiest airports... (https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/air-traffic-at-chinas-busiest-airports-down-80-since-the-beginning-of-the-year/) which suggests it's currently very roughly 25% down now from where it was prior to the disease outbreaks, but I also wonder about the influence of state control over their airlines, particularly those that the government is a majority shareholder of. It makes me question how much flying is being done there because it's a way to demonstrate to the world, so everyone can look on flightradar and the airport activity statements, and see how well the airline industry and China overall is "recovering" under the Chinese government rule.

Article here with post lockdown figures in Chinese airlines. (https://www.malaymail.com/news/money/2020/07/24/daily-passenger-flights-in-china-rebound-to-80pc-of-pre-covid-levels/1887755)

In late July 70% of scheduled flights flown compared to 2019 numbers. Not the same but not apocalyptically less.

Load factor average was 73%. Only a little increase needed to resume the average pre Covid load factor which I believe is around 85% for all airlines.

So the industry there is on the way back, hopefully it will follow here as well.

[DeltaT]

Original article here (https://worldofaviation.com/2020/07/iata-pushes-recovery-date-back-to-2024-amid-surprisingly-weak-demand/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=31072020)

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has said that the sector will not recover fully until 2024 due to “surprisingly weak” demand – a year later than earlier predictions.

Figures released by the IATA on Tuesday show that global revenue passenger kilometres (RPKs) were down around 87 per cent in June versus the same month in 2019 – a much worse outcome than initially expected. Revised estimates from the body put RPK recovery at 2024, while total passenger numbers are expected to return to a 2019 baseline by 2023.

The revised forecast comes on the back of a lack of consumer confidence (https://worldofaviation.com/2020/07/post-covid-air-travel-demand-to-lull-iata/), a decline in business travel, and “second wave” concerns in parts of the US and continental Europe.