PDA

View Full Version : Saw a Dak on Sunday


Centaurus
15th Apr 2020, 14:36
Sunday 12 April right on mid-day. I was enjoying the sound of birds in the trees of my suburb in Melbourne when an old but familiar sound was heard in the sky. Looked up and it was a DC3 at 1500 ft flying southbound on final (?) for 17 at Essendon. Or maybe a flight around the Bay? .

With so few aeroplanes in the Melbourne skies at the moment, it was such a pleasure and I confess a bit nostalgic, to hear again the sound of twin Pratt & Whitneys. Better still to be able to catch a fleeting glimpse of the ever so graceful lines of the "Dak" as we called them in RAAF days.

Anyone know who owns that DC3 and where is it based?

Stikman
15th Apr 2020, 21:34
Could it have been Melbourne's Gooney Bird? Operated by Shortstop Jet Charter, and based at YMEN.

Sunfish
15th Apr 2020, 21:41
I think Alan Searle used to fly it.

Checklist Charlie
15th Apr 2020, 22:12
I believe Ansett's VH-ABR was out and about on Sunday. If that is what you saw, the sound was Wright Cyclones, not Pratt's.
Doesn't really matter they both sing their respective songs so very sweetly.
Sunny, Alan normally flew TAA's AES before it when north to HARS. That said young Alan could fly any DC3 in his sleep, he's been flying them for over 50 years.

CC

djpil
16th Apr 2020, 00:04
Alan took one to China a while back FLYING THE HUMP -- Commemorative Flight across the Himalayas to China (http://www.flyingthehump.com/)

Sunfish
16th Apr 2020, 01:29
Djpil, Hopefully our paths will cross again after covid19 and I’ll ask about the hump. I saw him before Christmas.

Centaurus
16th Apr 2020, 02:28
RAAF Dakotas operated with full anti-icing equipment which included full length rubber de-icer boots on the length of the wings, stabiliser and fin.

Australian civilian registered DC3 passenger and freight aircraft had this equipment removed presumably to increase payload. The Regulator of the day (presumably Post War) must have approved this on an airworthiness basis? That said, both military and civil DC3's had propeller de-icing and windscreen de-icing fitted.

Despite the absence of airframe icing protection TAA, Qantas and Ansett and all the other VH registered DC3's often found themselves iced up; particularly during winter on flights to Tasmania. This scribe experienced being iced up numerous times when flying DC3 freight to Tasmania.

But you can bet your bottom dollar DCA would have added the caveat "Flight in icing condition prohibited" when approving the removal of airframe anti-icing equipment on VH registered DC3's but with tongue in cheek knowing it would be impossible to completely avoid icing in cloud.

I wondered about the politics involved when someone high up in the flight operations section of DCA deemed it safe for these aircraft to fly in icing conditions without adequate de-icing equipment.

Who decided it was safe to operate VH-registered DC3 passenger and cargo DC3's without airframe de-icing equipment installed, yet on the other hand mandated prop and windscreen de-icing on these aircraft?.
Where was the logic?

Kiwiconehead
16th Apr 2020, 04:23
Alan used to fly TMQ at Ausjet/Air Nostalgia as well.

Not sure what has happened to TMQ - I heard it had been sold and was heading to South Africa

Register still shows the Receivers as owners

trashie
16th Apr 2020, 05:26
Interesting flying the Dak in South East Asia during the wet season attempting find the gaps in the CBs. Many braised knuckles helping change the spark plugs. Always carried several sets.

Queen of the Skies:O

Eric Janson
16th Apr 2020, 10:58
That said, both military and civil DC3's had propeller de-icing and windscreen de-icing fitted.


Just a small correction - these are both anti ice systems not de-ice. You wet both the props and windshield to prevent ice forming.

For getting rid of ice on the props - increasing the RPM will sling the ice off.

Centaurus
16th Apr 2020, 15:09
these are both anti ice systems not de-ice. You wet both the props and windshield to prevent ice forming

Now that’s interesting. I refer to RAF Pilots Notes for Dakota 2nd edition A.P.244D date June 1946.

Page 18 under OTHER CONTROLS, talks about Propeller anti-icers and Propeller de-icing pumps.

However, paragraph 34 talks about Windscreen de-icers

The windscreens were not “wetted” as in precautionary measure to prevent ice from forming.

According to the RAF Dakota Pilots Notes publication two independent systems are provided. Sliding Panel de-icers and main windscreen de-icers. Note the words de-icers.

The design required the de-icers to remove ice from the windscreen and sliding window after it occurred.

megan
16th Apr 2020, 16:24
The flight manual of a Canadian DC-3 operator says,The propeller anti icing system is installed in the airplane to prevent the formation of ice rather than to remove it when formed. The system should therefore be used whenever icing conditions are expected or suspected.Windshield is also referred to as änti icing, the TCDS though refers to de icing. The Constellation manual advises to turn anti/de ice alcohol on once ice has begun to form.

Mach E Avelli
16th Apr 2020, 20:16
The type of question that some check captains ask to prove that theirs is bigger than yours.....people it does not matter whether you call it a willy or a donger: what matters is that you know when to use it and how to use it..

Centaurus
17th Apr 2020, 00:44
it does not matter whether you call it a willy or a donger: what matters is that you know when to use it and how to use it..

Classic. Should be the opening preamble to the MoS. CASA note.

megan
17th Apr 2020, 02:18
people it does not matter whether you call it a willy or a donger: what matters is that you know when to use it and how to use itInstruction available Mach? Bit late for me though. ;)

Mach E Avelli
17th Apr 2020, 02:25
Theory only on offer, no "hands on" instruction available!

Hoosten
17th Apr 2020, 02:44
I believe there's a DC3 owned by Little's mob at Tulla? The new bizjet precinct. Maybe that one?

Eric Janson
17th Apr 2020, 09:14
The important point is that there is still at least one flying in Australia.

werbil
17th Apr 2020, 10:09
VH-MMA is also operational in Darwin. I was admiring her today as I was taxying in.

werbil
24th Apr 2020, 23:10
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/2000x971/20200425_083444_abe425a3a18f3e42b4d03fb259c039f2f6b45491.jpg
Such a beautiful sound.
VH-MMA flying over Darwin just now.

pithblot
25th Apr 2020, 07:28
Thanks werbil.

It’s good to ‘hear’ that MMA is flying once again, especially on this restricted ANZAC Day.

The Hardy family have done a great job over many years now with Ashburton, not only as a commercial venture with Air North back in the day, but also with regular flypasts to commemorate the bombing of Darwin and today’s flight, marking ANZAC Day.

I’m pretty sure it was VH-MMA (might have been CAN) that John Hardy sent to Sydney from Darwin to meet up with other DC3s to celebrate the type’s 50th anniversary. (198?)

Darwin and Ambon are sister cities and Air North used to run charter flights between the two flying Cessna 310s, 402s, 404s and Conquests. In the 80s the Gull Force Association would converge on Darwin from around Australia, and charter aircraft to Ambon for the annual ANZAC Day service (in Ambon). The Gull Force Association maintained strong friendships with the Ambonese, who harboured and protected Gull Force members from the Japanese during the war at great personal risk.

One year, instead of using Spam Cans, the Gull Force Vets chartered MMA for their annual trip to Ambon. This was in the eighties and numbers had dwindled but they were delighted to spend 5 hrs + each way in that old DC3.