PDA

View Full Version : PFI Aircraft


Finningley Boy
7th Aug 2019, 15:55
A couple of questions under the one title;

What aircraft operated by the RAF are provided through PFI funding? i.e. rented, further does this arrangement prohibit participation in flying displays?

FB

Timelord
7th Aug 2019, 17:17
As far as I know the only PFI aircraft are the Airtanker Voyagers. Lots more are owned by MFTS contractors .No idea what the air show situation is.

tornadoken
9th Aug 2019, 09:16
If the thrust of your Q is: does nominal ownership influence ability to display...No.
Case A: write-off and/or liability (dead spectators). Where we own the a/c, we (self-insure) ao we (MoD) pay or write off. When we (rent), the contract will either have an MoD indemnity or the rental price will include insurance.
Case B: over-temp/over-stress/heavy landing/misuse. Where we own the a/c and pay for all maintenance per-event, as required, we snarl at P/O Prune and pay up.
But we don't manage any a/c that way now. All, inc fast jets, are maintained on contract at some form of competiton/market-tested risk-price - Contracts for Availability. Misuse is a chargeable over-and-above. So Public Display Authority is given only to disciplined folk.

Finningley Boy
9th Aug 2019, 11:19
If the thrust of your Q is: does nominal ownership influence ability to display...No.
Case A: write-off and/or liability (dead spectators). Where we own the a/c, we (self-insure) ao we (MoD) pay or write off. When we (rent), the contract will either have an MoD indemnity or the rental price will include insurance.
Case B: over-temp/over-stress/heavy landing/misuse. Where we own the a/c and pay for all maintenance per-event, as required, we snarl at P/O Prune and pay up.
But we don't manage any a/c that way now. All, inc fast jets, are maintained on contract at some form of competiton/market-tested risk-price - Contracts for Availability. Misuse is a chargeable over-and-above. So Public Display Authority is given only to disciplined folk.

Many thanks Tornadoken,

You've quashed a few rumours I'd picked up. I understand all is PFI now apart from Fast Jets (including Hawk T2), C-130J and current operational Helicopter Fleet!?

FB

Rhino power
9th Aug 2019, 11:42
MFTS, DHFS, AirTanker are all PFI. The Hawk T.2 part of MFTS are MOD owned though. A400M, C-130, C-17, Puma, Chinook, Typhoon, F-35, Hawk T.1, BAe 146/Avro RJ, E.3 Sentry, Shadow R.1, Sentinel R.1, Rivet Joint are all MOD owned outright...

-RP

Napa Valley refugee
11th Aug 2019, 08:52
All the helicopters in UKMFTS are MOD owned. They are maintained by AHUK under contract to Ascent.

Easy Street
11th Aug 2019, 10:54
Never understood why this PFI malarkey continued after it was first outed as being a way for the Government to ‘borrow’ without increasing public sector borrowing ratios. At least in that guise it made (perverted) sense as a political device to simultaneously invest heavily in the public sector while appearing to exercise fiscal restraint. With that cover blown, it seems to me nothing more than a device for the Government to make investments that are unaffordable over its own (short) financial planning horizon. If investing on a 30-40 year outlook is possible in the private sector with the backing of investment banks, then surely the public sector can do likewise with cheaper finance in the form of Government bonds and cut out the management charges paid to the corporate middle-men? (scratches head... explanation gladly received)

Lima Juliet
11th Aug 2019, 10:59
IIRC the Texan, Phenom and Prefect eventually become MOD owned - I think it’s 2024? So I guess it’s more like a PCP finance deal? I may be wrong though...

tucumseh
11th Aug 2019, 11:00
PFI existed before New Labour came to power - they just expanded its use. In fact, we had to deal with it in MoD before we had networked PCs - I distinctly remember always putting 'NO' in the 'Overseas Sales potential' box on a pre-printed A5 memo to avoid the inevitable waste and programme delay.

pr00ne
11th Aug 2019, 18:09
Napa Valley refugee,

You SURE?

Are you sure that they aren't in fact all owned by Ascent?