AirfixPilot
4th Aug 2002, 11:38
Something earlier today reminded me of that Engineering (Officer?) who was sat on a wooden crate in one of the 'Illuminated Tubes' when he jumped the chocks on an engine test and did an impromptu circuit. Made it back because of a good talk-down from a member of the two-winged master race, coupled with some flying skills he gained whilst on a UAS.
Currently, UASs put loads of non-commited guys through the system who don't make it through OASC because they fail on apptitude tests or other areas. Not that I'm trying to re-light the UAS yes/no question, but Engineers and other ground branch students, sponsored or otherwise, aren't even given the opportunity to take advantage of the training system that is already in place at these units.
Besides the fact that there is no training provision made for sponsored ground branch students at present, (of any description, regardles of what the hierarchy might say), surely it is slightly short-sighted to just accept that because they are not under the pilot/nav canvas, they either do not have what it takes or that it is just not necessary.
How many of you aviators have had a point of contension with your unit EngO that could've been avoided if he had a better understanding of what the guys in the air really have to contend with?
Reminds me of complaints regarding bad procurement descisions, with kit having switches in stupid places etc etc. Surely some experience is better than none at all?
(Fire away!)
Currently, UASs put loads of non-commited guys through the system who don't make it through OASC because they fail on apptitude tests or other areas. Not that I'm trying to re-light the UAS yes/no question, but Engineers and other ground branch students, sponsored or otherwise, aren't even given the opportunity to take advantage of the training system that is already in place at these units.
Besides the fact that there is no training provision made for sponsored ground branch students at present, (of any description, regardles of what the hierarchy might say), surely it is slightly short-sighted to just accept that because they are not under the pilot/nav canvas, they either do not have what it takes or that it is just not necessary.
How many of you aviators have had a point of contension with your unit EngO that could've been avoided if he had a better understanding of what the guys in the air really have to contend with?
Reminds me of complaints regarding bad procurement descisions, with kit having switches in stupid places etc etc. Surely some experience is better than none at all?
(Fire away!)