sonicbum
23rd Mar 2019, 16:32
Cari colleghi,
qualche giorno fa è stato pubblicato il rapporto di uno studio condotto in EASA con l'ausilio di alcuni gruppi di lavoro riguardante le FTL. Ho avuto modo di dare un piccolissimo contributo a questo studio grazie anche al sondaggio che avevo pubblicato qualche mese fa qui su pprune che ovviamente era una goccia in mezzo al mare rispetto al materiale preso in considerazione dal team ma è stato comunque utilizzato. Trovate*qui (https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/general-publications/effectiveness-flight-time-limitation-ftl-report)*la spiegazione e*qui (https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/Report%20on%20effectiveness%20of%20FTL_final.pdf)*il rapporto. Lo studio non ha avuto collegamenti con nessuna Organizzazione Sindacale.*
edit :
faccio il veloce copia/incolla di un piccolo estratto per chi dovesse andare di fretta (come me adesso) :
5.1 Recommendation
1
It is recommended to amend the definition of ‘night’ FDP to reflect the different subgroups of ‘night ‘ FDPs. This would help operators to design effective fatigue risk measures.
5.2 Recommendation 2 The current FTL regulation does not require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to late finish FDPs. It is recommended to require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to mitigate the fatiguing effect of late finish FDPs, regardless of FDP duration.
5.3 Recommendation 3 The study results indicated that high fatigue at TOD during night FDPs of both long duration (> 10h) and shorter duration (≤ 10h). It is recommended to require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to mitigate the fatiguing effect of all night FDPs, regardless of FDP duration. 5.4 Recommendation 4 Within night FDPs, duty periods that end at 6.00 or later combined with a start at 1.59 or earlier show the greatest probability of high fatigue at TOD. It is recommended that the regulation define this category of FDP and require operators to pay specific attention to these FDPs when applying fatigue risk management.
5.5 Recommendation 5 The study found shorter prior sleep to be a predictor of high fatigue at TOD for all night FDPs. The current guidance material for night duties (GM1 CS FTL.1.205) stipulates that it is ‘critical for the crew member to obtain sufficient sleep’ for night duties longer than 10 hours. It is recommended that the GM be amended to state that it is critical for the crew member to obtain sufficient sleep before all night duties, regardless of FDP duration. 5.6 Recommendation 6 The analysis provides evidence of high fatigue at TOD during night FDPs. This seems to be fairly independent of FDP characteristics (e.g. start and end times, duration), as long as the FDP in question meets the criteria for a night FDP. The amount of prior sleep is the main predictor of eventual fatigue, therefore we recommend that for night FDPs, operators should be required to promote optimum use of sleep opportunities (i.e. before reporting and during the FDP).
qualche giorno fa è stato pubblicato il rapporto di uno studio condotto in EASA con l'ausilio di alcuni gruppi di lavoro riguardante le FTL. Ho avuto modo di dare un piccolissimo contributo a questo studio grazie anche al sondaggio che avevo pubblicato qualche mese fa qui su pprune che ovviamente era una goccia in mezzo al mare rispetto al materiale preso in considerazione dal team ma è stato comunque utilizzato. Trovate*qui (https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/general-publications/effectiveness-flight-time-limitation-ftl-report)*la spiegazione e*qui (https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/Report%20on%20effectiveness%20of%20FTL_final.pdf)*il rapporto. Lo studio non ha avuto collegamenti con nessuna Organizzazione Sindacale.*
edit :
faccio il veloce copia/incolla di un piccolo estratto per chi dovesse andare di fretta (come me adesso) :
5.1 Recommendation
1
It is recommended to amend the definition of ‘night’ FDP to reflect the different subgroups of ‘night ‘ FDPs. This would help operators to design effective fatigue risk measures.
5.2 Recommendation 2 The current FTL regulation does not require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to late finish FDPs. It is recommended to require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to mitigate the fatiguing effect of late finish FDPs, regardless of FDP duration.
5.3 Recommendation 3 The study results indicated that high fatigue at TOD during night FDPs of both long duration (> 10h) and shorter duration (≤ 10h). It is recommended to require operators to apply appropriate fatigue risk management to mitigate the fatiguing effect of all night FDPs, regardless of FDP duration. 5.4 Recommendation 4 Within night FDPs, duty periods that end at 6.00 or later combined with a start at 1.59 or earlier show the greatest probability of high fatigue at TOD. It is recommended that the regulation define this category of FDP and require operators to pay specific attention to these FDPs when applying fatigue risk management.
5.5 Recommendation 5 The study found shorter prior sleep to be a predictor of high fatigue at TOD for all night FDPs. The current guidance material for night duties (GM1 CS FTL.1.205) stipulates that it is ‘critical for the crew member to obtain sufficient sleep’ for night duties longer than 10 hours. It is recommended that the GM be amended to state that it is critical for the crew member to obtain sufficient sleep before all night duties, regardless of FDP duration. 5.6 Recommendation 6 The analysis provides evidence of high fatigue at TOD during night FDPs. This seems to be fairly independent of FDP characteristics (e.g. start and end times, duration), as long as the FDP in question meets the criteria for a night FDP. The amount of prior sleep is the main predictor of eventual fatigue, therefore we recommend that for night FDPs, operators should be required to promote optimum use of sleep opportunities (i.e. before reporting and during the FDP).