PDA

View Full Version : Ejection seats


Dr Jekyll
21st Oct 2018, 14:16
Not sure this is the correct forum. But how old was the oldest person ever to eject? Roughly what injuries did they sustain?

dook
21st Oct 2018, 19:58
Well, I'm certainly not but I can assure you it was a very smooth ride.

PAXboy
22nd Oct 2018, 00:45
dook How long did you have between realising that something was wrong and deciding that it was time to go?

dook
22nd Oct 2018, 10:36
Very little time - the time it took to zoom climb from 250 feet agl to about 2500 feet.

nipva
22nd Oct 2018, 11:30
The most common ejection injury is a compression fracture of vertebrae but with rocket assisted seats these are rare. More likely injuries occur when meeting terra firma again. Obviously, high speed ejections are another matter. In my case, with a rocket seat, I did have a compression fracture but I was in my mid 40s at the time and I broke an ankle on landing. No after effects to date. As to thinking time, it rather depends on whether it is premeditated or not. Again in my case I was back on terra firma 49secs after starting my take off roll and am very glad that I did not have (or need!) time to think about it.

PAXboy
22nd Oct 2018, 13:03
That indicates, dook, that something went wrong very quickly after rotation and you had to get to 2,500 before pulling the blind? May one ask what machine you were compelled to leave?

dook
22nd Oct 2018, 13:35
It wasn't after rotation - it was over half an hour into the trip and at 450 knots. The zoom was to get away from the ground and kill speed. Both engines had failed.

There was no blind to pull - it was Mk9 seat and there was only a lower handle.

India Four Two
22nd Oct 2018, 14:34
My one and only ride on a live seat was in a Marshall's Vampire at Shawbury in 1969. I still vividly remember being warned, as part of the seat checkout in the Safety Equipment Bay, that because it was powered by explosives and not rockets (a Mk. 3?), I would probably damage my spine if I had to eject!

Herod
22nd Oct 2018, 15:31
I've only ever flown one aircraft with an ejector seat; the JP. Never had to use it, thank goodness. I was told however, that back injuries were less common in the RN. Because of the catapult launch and cable recovery, the pilots were strapped in much tighter that the general RAF pilot would be. One from my South Cerney course was demonstrating the rig, which was, I believe, a one-third charge. There was a mis-fire, and he loosened his straps while they sorted it out. Sadly for him, the seat fired, and he damaged his back such that he couldn't proceed to pilot training.

kenparry
23rd Oct 2018, 09:06
My one and only ride on a live seat was in a Marshall's Vampire at Shawbury in 1969. I still vividly remember being warned, as part of the seat checkout in the Safety Equipment Bay, that because it was powered by explosives and not rockets (a Mk. 3?), I would probably damage my spine if I had to eject!

Yes, the seat in the T11 was cartridge powered - from long before the days of rocket seats. I trained on the T11; the seat was MB, Mk3 according to their website. It was not as capable as some other Mk 3 seats, having a 60ft/sec gun which meant you needed 200 ft agl and 120 kt IAS in level flight. Other Mk3 seats (e.g. Hunter) were fitted with an 80ft/sec gun, which gave 90 kt ground level capability. We were told that the Vampire structure was not strong enough for the more powerful gun.

The 80ft/sec gun regularly produced minor spinal injuries, but I suspect the 60ft/sec version was a little kinder.

dook
23rd Oct 2018, 09:15
I have several friends who have used the 80 ft/sec seat and none of them suffered any injuries.

The most important aspect was posture upon ejection.

nipva
23rd Oct 2018, 10:16
Having seen Dook's post 11 above I realise that my post 5 was somewhat misleading in that it may have implied that ejection injuries are common. They are not and I too know of many colleagues and friends who have had injury free ejections. What I should have said is that if an injury is sustained during a pre-meditated and other than high speed ejection it is more likely to be a compression fracture. Dook is absolutely right - posture is the key. However, age is also a factor. As the vertebrae discs lose their flexibilty, their ability to absorb a rapid acceleration reduces.
We members of the Martin-Baker club are eternally grateful for their life-saving seats. My apologies for my potentially misleading post. It would be interesting to know though who the oldest successful ejectee was and how he fared (I am assuming that the oldest will be a male).

dook
23rd Oct 2018, 11:26
According to the ballistics boffins at Boscombe, my parachute opened at 190ft agl and the seat was never travelling upwards with respect to the ground after ejection.

The aeroplane was travelling backwards with hardly any forward speed when it impacted and I landed about fifty yards from the fireball.

I remember landing like a sack of potatoes and never even had time to release the PSP.

spekesoftly
23rd Oct 2018, 11:52
According to the ballistics boffins at Boscombe, my parachute opened at 190ft agl and the seat was never travelling upwards with respect to the ground after ejection.


Was that because when you ejected the aircraft was descending rapidly or steeply banked, or both?

dook
23rd Oct 2018, 12:19
Descending rapidly with no engines.

nipva
23rd Oct 2018, 14:45
Another having descended rapidly with no engines 41secs after t/o. Ejected at 230' 150kts in shallow descent. Like dook no time for descent VA's before being dumped back on land.https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/794x544/wreck_57f401669319c7a492b1d161b9143f166cee38e3.jpg

Rosevidney1
23rd Oct 2018, 19:50
My recollections on the Vampire T11 are mainly on how uncomfortable the seating was. It was not unlike sitting on a rock!

dook
23rd Oct 2018, 19:54
My longest trip was just over five hours in company with Martin Baker's finest and it was painless.

topgas
23rd Oct 2018, 21:34
An intrepid employee, Bernard Lynch, attempted the first static ejection on 24th January 1945. He then conducted the first mid-flight test ejection on 24th July 1946. He ejected himself from the rear cockpit of a specially modified Meteor 3 at 320 mph, 8000 ft in the air. Bernard Lynch made a perfect landing and subsequently made a further 30 ejections.

Not sure what period this covered, or his age, but he must be a possible candidate.

Load Toad
24th Oct 2018, 06:38
The Ejection Site (http://www.ejectionsite.com/)

CoodaShooda
24th Oct 2018, 13:17
Doddy Hay would have been 39 or 40 when he did the Zero/Zero testing.

glad rag
7th Nov 2018, 16:50
According to the ballistics boffins at Boscombe, my parachute opened at 190ft agl and the seat was never travelling upwards with respect to the ground after ejection.

The aeroplane was travelling backwards with hardly any forward speed when it impacted and I landed about fifty yards from the fireball.



'kin 'ell that was a close call :D

dook
7th Nov 2018, 16:58
Certainly was and what's more two of us escaped. We reckoned we punched about a second apart and landed just under 100 yards from each other.

glad rag
7th Nov 2018, 18:03
What seat was it? if you don't mind..

dook
7th Nov 2018, 18:07
Martin Baker Mk9 - see post #7.

Fareastdriver
7th Nov 2018, 18:17
When we arrived at Oakington we had our thighs measured. A couple were too lanky to fit in a Vampire with bang seats so they were sent off to the Meteor Flight.

Problem solved: Climb over the side.

glad rag
7th Nov 2018, 18:27
Martin Baker Mk9 - see post #7.

Ouch........:O

dook
7th Nov 2018, 18:39
When we arrived at Oakington we had our thighs measured.

'twas the same at Coltishall when a new WRAF officer arrived in the mess. :E

Haraka
8th Nov 2018, 07:40
The initial thinking behind the rocket seat was primarily to keep the seat going on up post the gun firing, clearance of the tail assembly being one consideration.
The alternative solution with the early F. 104 was not found to be such a good idea!

dook
8th Nov 2018, 08:23
Not really.

An analysis by Martin Baker showed that most ejections were low and slow and in many cases descending.

This was the main design reason behind the advent of rocket-assisted escape systems.

Haraka
8th Nov 2018, 09:24
I was very cautious in my wording dook .
The first production rocket seat was in the F102 in the 50's and if you look at the height of the fin you can see what the main consideration was in that case.
The" low and slow" requirement was a later driver , albeit an extremely relevant one as addressed by M.B My comment of "primarily to keep the seat going on up post the gun firing" was meant to embrace that, on the way to "Zero Zero" and the later ACES and Russian seats, as later publicly demonstrated by Anatoly Kvochur out of the MiG 29 at Paris in 1989..
Like many others I initially thought that the rocket was primarily to help spread the "g" load during ejection. A fallacy that I was quickly disabused of during study detachments to the R.A.F.Institute of Aviation Medicine in the late 60's and early 70's.

chevvron
8th Nov 2018, 16:59
When we arrived at Oakington we had our thighs measured. A couple were too lanky to fit in a Vampire with bang seats so they were sent off to the Meteor Flight.

I understand this was because there was a tendency for your legs to be removed above the knee by the edge of the cockpit windscreen if your thighs were too long.

chevvron
8th Nov 2018, 17:09
According to the ballistics boffins at Boscombe, my parachute opened at 190ft agl and the seat was never travelling upwards with respect to the ground after ejection.

The aeroplane was travelling backwards with hardly any forward speed when it impacted and I landed about fifty yards from the fireball.

I remember landing like a sack of potatoes and never even had time to release the PSP.
When the fly-by-wire Hunter lost its engine just after liftoff at Farnborough, both pilots ejected and landed in the burning fuel on the runway where the aircraft had impacted, the remains of the aircraft then sliding into the arrestor barrier.
I didn't (quite) witness the occurence so I can't judge what height they ejected; I watched it taxy out and enter the runway from my car in the tower car park (it had been parked on the pan next to the tower) then I drove off, not knowing what was about to happen less than a minute later.

ian16th
9th Nov 2018, 08:32
When we arrived at Oakington we had our thighs measured. A couple were too lanky to fit in a Vampire with bang seats so they were sent off to the Meteor Flight.

Problem solved: Climb over the side.

While I was at Coningsby, 1956-7, a tall 57 Sqdn pilot was strapped in a seat of a Canberra B2, while the seat was winched out of the a/c.

When it reached the point where his knees would have been chopped off, the seat was lowered, he was unstrapped and he climbed out.

He was taken off Canberra's. Dunno what happened to him.

ancientaviator62
9th Nov 2018, 09:06
On 92 when we changed from the Hunter to the Lightning some of the taller pilots were measured and at least one of our pilots discovered he was the wrong dimensions to escape unscathed should he need to eject from the Lightning. His complaint was that his legs were 'too long for the cockpit of the biggest fighter the RAF ever had '.

dook
9th Nov 2018, 09:11
Yes, but the cockpit was tiny. I am 5ft 11ins but one of my Lightning colleagues was a 6ft 3ins South African and he fitted OK.

Sitting thigh length was the criterion and we're all different.

India Four Two
9th Nov 2018, 10:45
dook,

I'm also 5' 11" and sitting thigh length is within spec, but when I sat in an F6, I couldn't see how I could eject with my knees intact. Were the seat rails inclined?

I was also impressed by how high up I was!

newt
9th Nov 2018, 12:04
My ejection height was 73 feet above ground level! I think my shoulders rotated down in the shoulder straps as I remember seeing the cockpit going away from me! From talking on the radio....the world goes very quiet! Checked the chute and dropped the PSP then landed like a sack of potatoes in a ploughed field! Lay on my back thinking about others who had damaged themselves! After a few seconds, I stood up to take off my helmet! Just then, my number two flew over to see if I had got out! Scared me to death! I was unscathed but sat down to write down all the parameters I could remember! Old tip from my squadron QFI!! Very useful at the subsequent BOI!

Tailspin Turtle
9th Nov 2018, 14:37
My recollections on the Vampire T11 are mainly on how uncomfortable the seating was. It was not unlike sitting on a rock!

I likened it to sitting on a new wooden church pew (MB 5 in an OV-1D Mohawk). The lack of cushioning was a feature in the event of an ejection. If there was any, the seat would accelerate upward when fired whereas your butt would still be stationary due to inertia. The result increased the shock loading on your spine. It was bad enough without the cushion. The seat qualification (pull the blind, go up the track) was with a reduced charge and my back still hurt for a few days.

PAXboy
9th Nov 2018, 15:26
The training setup that is sometimes seen in documentaries of a captive seat and compressed air pistonl lift of the seat - how realistic is that? Is simply about pulling the blind/handle or does it give more sense of how it will be? Looking back - was it helpful in preparing you?

dook
9th Nov 2018, 15:47
Lay on my back thinking about others who had damaged themselves!

newt,

I've seen you like that on a dining-in night mate ! :E

Dr Jekyll
9th Nov 2018, 18:50
dook,

I'm also 5' 11" and sitting thigh length is within spec, but when I sat in an F6, I couldn't see how I could eject with my knees intact. Were the seat rails inclined?

I was also impressed by how high up I was!

What was the maximum thigh length? Since I was too young, too blind, and lacked the aptitude to fly my favourite all time fighter it would be nice if I met at least one of the criteria.

dook
9th Nov 2018, 18:58
Thigh length varies with the aeroplane. They all vary.

Designers will usually work on the ninety-fifth percentile of human measurements.

Sitting in a particular aeroplane it often appears that you won't clear the instrument pane and/or windscreen rail.

I had this impression in the Lightning but flew it. Newt might tell you more since he threw one away.

He's about my height but nowadays bigger in girth. :E

newt
9th Nov 2018, 21:26
Actually Mate it was a Jaguar and I did not throw it away.......it tried to kill me! Just like you did at a dining in night lol!

dook
9th Nov 2018, 21:45
Need memory pill.

binbrook
10th Nov 2018, 11:22
The Mk 1C seat in the Canberra did have a cushion, filled with incompressible and supposedly potable water. It was still uncomfortable, and on long flights the water was known to freeze.

Haraka
10th Nov 2018, 12:26
The ergonomics of early British ejection sets was problematical.
Just one example: attachment points for upper body ( "Shoulder') restraints being low down on the back. Tightening these straps up resulted in pre-compression of the inter-vertebral discs,thus removing some of the shock absorption provided within the spinal column .
Another: with slightly loosened straps though , going for the top handle could lift the torso off the seat, so the seat was under way accelerating before hitting the base of the spine.
There were other issues..........

PAXboy
10th Nov 2018, 21:35
Actually Mate it was a Jaguar and I did not throw it away.......it tried to kill me!In what way did this Jaguar take exception to your presence?? :uhoh:

dook
11th Nov 2018, 10:30
In a different way to mine.

sandiego89
16th Nov 2018, 17:05
Bill Park was 51 when he pulled the handle on the Have Blue prototype- his 4th! ejection. He was inured, but likely not age related.

https://www.f-117a.com/HB1.html

I do wonder if 4 actual ejections (not testing related/on purpose) is a record? I know some late WWII Germans had multiples and a few test and fast jet drivers had multiples, including a few F-8 Crusader pilots with 3.

NickB
30th Jan 2019, 14:38
Not the oldest, but my friends' Dad was, I think for a while, the youngest to use a bang seat as a young Midshipman who had reason to get out of a JP pretty sharpish.... his event in the mid/late 60s was listed on the excellent 'ejection history' website that has now been taken down.

jimjim1
11th Feb 2019, 19:33
the excellent 'ejection history' website that has now been taken down.

'Gone' but not yet forgotten.

The Wayback Machine seems to have archived the site - this is the usual case as far as I can see.

30 Oct 2014 - Just after site is stated to have been last updated
https://web.archive.org/web/20141030181918/http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/

3 July 2014
​​​​https://web.archive.org/web/20140703061537/http://www.ejection-history.org.uk/