PDA

View Full Version : Tyndall AFB - Hurricane Michael - Evacuation & Damage


RAFEngO74to09
12th Oct 2018, 01:05
All operational aircraft - a large fleet of F-22, F-35, F-15E and F-16C - were evacuated from Tyndall AFB, FL to Wright Patterson AFB, OH on 9 Oct 18.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGHKLfXTwvc

Just as well - as this is what Tyndall AFB looks like now on 11 Oct 18.

An F-15 Gate Guard was flipped upside down - a number of QF-16s can be seen inside a hangar with the roof collapsed..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbMHqBnnBL4

Fareastdriver
12th Oct 2018, 07:00
That was certainly some hurricane. I been in a few typhoons in the Far East but the results have been nothing compared with that.

NutLoose
12th Oct 2018, 09:13
http://imagesvc.timeincapp.com/v3/foundry/image/?q=70&w=1440&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftimedotcom.files.wordpress.com%2F2018%2F10 %2Fadad111.jpg%3Fquality%3D85

NutLoose
12th Oct 2018, 09:15
Looks like an F22 in that shed

http://kcfj570.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-10-11t183425z-1041119715-rc18cff6aa30-rtrmadp-3-storm-michael.jpg

MPN11
12th Oct 2018, 10:50
Severely nasty.

Still, a good opportunity to exercise (for real) some ADR/BDR Teams.

Nige321
12th Oct 2018, 17:55
From the Tyndall website

UPDATE: Tyndall Air Force Base leadership just conducted its first aerial assessment of the base. We are grateful that Tyndall has had no reported injuries or fatalities. Damage across the base is extensive. Here are some highlights; all base houses sustained significant roof and siding damage. Some houses sustained more significant structural failures. Some Tyndall dorms appear to have fared well; others sustained severe damage.
The flight line is devastated. Every building has severe damage.
Many buildings are a complete loss.

The hurricane completely destroyed the Tyndall marina. The structures and docks are gone.

The drone runway, AFCEC labs, and Silver Flag areas all sustained catastrophic damage. Tyndall Elementary School sustained severe damage. The BX and commissary sustained severe damage, and the two shoppettes sustained catastrophic damage.
Help is on the way. Initial relief and support requested by the ride out team, is due to arrive as early as this evening. Air Force and government officials have responded quickly to our requests.
The base remains closed. Trees and power lines block nearly every road. At this time, power and basic utilities remain out.
Base leaders will continue to provide regular updates as the base begins the long road to recovery. Thank you for your continued patience.

Onceapilot
12th Oct 2018, 18:33
Hmmmm, I suggest, only 20mph away from some total devastation here! Best wishes to all involved... you will be strong again soon! :D

OAP

Out Of Trim
13th Oct 2018, 02:00
"Don't just stand there.. Get one up!"

glad rag
13th Oct 2018, 14:09
Severely nasty.

Still, a good opportunity to exercise (for real) some ADR/BDR Teams.

No such thing and hasn't been for years..

MPN11
13th Oct 2018, 17:19
No such thing and hasn't been for years..
Damn ... that was a whole tour at MoD wasted :(

I was working on a project to equip the [then] Gazelle fleet and deploy them to MOBs with post-attack recce equipment beamed into the WOC. ADR/EOD 2000 :)

bafanguy
13th Oct 2018, 19:13
From the first post, at 2:34 in “Damage at Tyndall Air Force Base…" video, in the hangar with the damaged F16s there appear to be several high wing TP airplanes that look like Mitsubishi MU2s. Are they ? I wouldn't expect the USAF to have MU2s.

Two's in
13th Oct 2018, 19:19
From the first post, at 2:34 in “Damage at Tyndall Air Force Base…" video, in the hangar with the damaged F16s there appear to be several high wing TP airplanes that look like Mitsubishi MU2s. Are they ? I wouldn't expect the USAF to have MU2s.

https://www.tyndall.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/316692/mu-2-pilots-provide-valuable-abm-training/

TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. -- Nestled in the middle of the Tyndall flight line next to some of the most sophisticated fighters in the world, are eight white turbo prop Mitsubishi MU-2 flight training aircraft.
Some may say these aircraft seem odd parked near the F-22 Raptors or F-15 Eagles, but the mission of these MU-2 aircraft and the pilots that fly them are just as vital to developing America's Air Dominance...

NutLoose
13th Oct 2018, 20:30
I hope they have fixed the props, they had a habit of shedding blades and crashing, long time since I have worked on them and I didnt realise there were many left flying.

Those F16 seem to have been parked well, with vehicles to act as air flow spoilers to prevent them lifting if the doors went, I would imaging a lot of the missing roof will be a couple of blocks away and wouldn't have collapsed in.

No ADR/BDR, what ever happened to the broomhandles and jubilee clips we had millions :E

bafanguy
13th Oct 2018, 20:46
Two's in,

Thanks for that. So much to know...so little time.

pr00ne
14th Oct 2018, 13:07
Two’s in,

Why MU-2’s?

glad rag
14th Oct 2018, 13:29
Damn ... that was a whole tour at MoD wasted :(

I was working on a project to equip the [then] Gazelle fleet and deploy them to MOBs with post-attack recce equipment beamed into the WOC. ADR/EOD 2000 :)


Indeed. I Qualified on the last dual elect/airframe assessors course at Saints.

The fun bit was actually planning your own repair.

The downside was the only time you got to practise it for real was when you were masked up for the 12 + hours of the job....

etudiant
14th Oct 2018, 16:21
Seems 12 F-22s were left hangared at Tyndall and suffered damage, possibly unrepairable. At $400mm a copy, that is serious hit, not to mention that with only 180 F-22s around, the USAF fighter arm is feeling even more pinched.
http://www.airforcemag.com/DRArchive/Pages/2018/October%202018/October%2015%202018/Hurricane-Michael-Damages-F-22s-Left-at-Tyndall-New-Special-Warfare-Training-Wing-Activated-SOUTHCOM-US-Forces-Korea-Nomine.aspx

Makes one think that perhaps hangar construction could be strengthened in those areas.

MPN11
14th Oct 2018, 16:55
When the gulf coast/FL panhadle is prone to hurricanes one would have thought more robust infrastructure might have been appropriate to protect such expensive assets.

Isn’t hindsight wonderful!

Onceapilot
14th Oct 2018, 17:26
When the gulf coast/FL panhadle is prone to hurricanes one would have thought more robust infrastructure might have been appropriate to protect such expensive assets.

Isn’t hindsight wonderful!

Well, you in the land of Tornado/Hurricane shelters, you would think that some storm shelter provision for small $400M items would be wise? The same logic might prevail to provide similar structures that would protect such valuable aircraft from various maniacs or a base attack.?

OAP

MPN11
14th Oct 2018, 18:04
OAP, we are unanimous in that. But of course nobody would ever think of defending against an attack on a military facility in the USofA.

Both a very sad and rather amusing event, really. I took a cyber-drive on Google Earth along Tyndall Parkway. Some serious decorative fences along there. ;)

Two's in
14th Oct 2018, 18:10
Two’s in,

Why MU-2’s?

Good question. The most likely reason is the MU-2 provides near jet performance (almost 300kt, 30,000 ceiling) with turboprop operating costs and handling (75 kt stall). This performance is partially responsible for it's chequered history (over 300 fatalities since introduction) where some handling characteristics were either not taught well, or not understood well by pilots used to piston engine performance. The full span flaps coupled with spoilers for roll control require specific techniques in slow speed or single engine recoveries. The FAA addressed the high accident rate by issuing a Special Federal Air Regulation (SFAR) requiring all MU-2 pilots to receive type-specific initial training and recurrent training. That significantly reduced the accident rates. In the case of Tyndall, the company with the contract (Air 1st) has over 30 years experience operating and maintaining an MU-2 fleet the US, so they obviously manged to convince a DOD Contracting Officer it was the right plane for the job, and won the bid.

Two's in
14th Oct 2018, 18:50
When the gulf coast/FL panhadle is prone to hurricanes one would have thought more robust infrastructure might have been appropriate to protect such expensive assets.

Isn’t hindsight wonderful!

This is an interesting paper from 2001 which lists damage to be expected in a Catastrophic storm (winds greater than 155 mph) which is where Hurricane Michael came in at. Tyndall has been a base for far longer than the current robust building codes have been in place (1941), and although there will be newer buildings, not everything is built to the current code. Slab-sided buildings like hangars are subject to massive forces at those wind speeds, and as you will see below, it is often the case of "for want of a nail.." the building was lost. To build everything to withstand a Cat 4/5 Hurricane would be cost-prohibitive, so like many things in this world, it's a compromise between resilience and cost, taking the gamble that the "big one" won't hit you. The only sure fire way to prevent Hurricane damage is not to have an Air Force Base on or near the coast in a Hurricane region, it's as simple as that. I currently reside not too far from Patrick AFB in Florida, which is a tropical paradise built on the outer bank of sand south of Cocoa Beach between the Atlantic and the rest of Florida. It's been hit by multiple Hurricanes but without any major damage, and a sure sign it's time to evacuate is when the gaggle of C-130's and HH-60's lift off and head North. If that ever gets hit by a Cat 5 there probably won't be an outer bank any more, never mind an Air Base. In the meantime, the planners keep rolling the dice while keeping the evacuation plans up to date.

So it's not really hindsight, it's risk management and gambling in it's most extreme form. Tyndall's account balance just got reset to zero in this case.

Hurricanes and their Effects on Buildings and Structures in the Caribbean (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibbs_01.htm)

Hurricanes and their Effects on Buildings and Structures in the Caribbean
by Tony Gibbs, Director, CEP2.2 Catastrophic Failures 2.2.1 Foundations (Photo 1 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0102.gif))The uplift forces from hurricane winds can sometimes pull buildings completely out of the ground. In contrast to designing for gravity loads, the lighter the building the larger (or heavier) the foundation needs to be in hurricane resistant design. Ignoring this precept has led to some dramatic failure of long-span, steel-framed warehouses.2.2.2 Steel Frames (Photo 2 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0102.gif))A common misconception is that the loss of cladding relieves the loads from building frameworks. There are several circumstances where the opposite is the case and where the wind loads on the structural frame increases substantially with the loss of cladding.Usually the weakness in steel frames is in the connections. Thus economising on minor items (bolts) has led to the overall failure of the major items (columns, beams and rafters).2.2.3 Masonry Houses (Photo 3 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0103.gif))These are usually regarded as being safe in hurricanes. There are countless examples where the loss of roofs has triggered the total destruction of un-reinforced masonry walls.2.2.4 Timber Houses (Photo 4 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0103.gif))The key to safe construction of timber houses in the connection details. The inherent vulnerability of light-weight timber houses coupled with poor connections is a dangerous combination which has often led to disaster.2.2.5 Reinforced Concrete Frames (Photo 5 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0104.gif))The design of reinforced concrete frames is usually controlled by the seismic hazard. In countries where this is not an issue care still needs to be exercised to ensure that the concrete frames can accommodate the wind forces. There have been a few isolated examples where, ignoring this, has led to disaster.2.2.6 Telecommunication Towers and Masts (Photo 6 (http://www.oas.org/pgdm/document/bitc/papers/gibbs/gibb0104.gif))These are almost always consciously-engineered structures. There is no good reason why so many of them fail in hurricanes. The bad reason is usually inadequate procurement procedures. Specialist advice is not often sought in specifying design criteria for suppliers or in checking that specified criteria have been met. The most common destruction of engineered structures in Caribbean hurricanes is in this class of facility.

MPN11
14th Oct 2018, 18:58
Very interesting, and the points are well taken. Thanks for that input :ok:

LowObservable
14th Oct 2018, 23:09
I suspect that part of the planning always involved "and then we fly the expensive airplanes out".

Woops

JimNtexas
14th Oct 2018, 23:48
Good question. The most likely reason is the MU-2 provides near jet performance (almost 300kt, 30,000 ceiling) with turboprop operating costs and handling (75 kt stall). ...

I was directly involved in the selection of the MU-2. The requirement was for a tuboprop airplane that could attain 250 knots in level flight.

The ‘Rice Rocket’ replaced the T-33 for the primary mission of providing a target (aka ‘duck’) for student GCI controllers.

It had to go 250 knots because the radar training consoles could double the displayed speed as long as the real airplane could go 250 knots.

Treble one
15th Oct 2018, 10:36
I was led to believe from reports that the F-22's left were either unserviceable (indeed some being cannabalised for parts for the rest of the fleet), or couldn't be generated as serviceable in time to escape the storm. Indeed on aircraft went u/s whilst taxying for take off it was reported.

MPN11
15th Oct 2018, 16:54
Thread Drift ... use of the MU-2 for Fighter Controller training reminds me of my GCA Course in 1966. After some time on Simulators, we went LIVE!! Initially with Piston Provosts and then with Vampires, flown by Marshall’s contract pilots, pointing at our 2 MPN-11 GCA Trucks at RAF Sleap. I even got a ‘Tick VG’ for passing traffic advisory on a flock of birds in the middle of a talkdown!! :)

Not a lot new these days, just different hardware.

JSF-TC
15th Oct 2018, 19:37
Why MU-2’s?

25+ years ago when I was at Eglin shooting AMRAAMs from Dunsfold's finest wonder-jet, the MU-2 was used as a range clearance aircraft and weapon TM re-rad, especially when shooting down low and well out to sea.


As a related aside, great photos of XZ439 from Vzlet on the "Royal Navy F-35B compared with anything" thread - good to see it is still going strong.

Melchett01
15th Oct 2018, 22:54
Looks like an F22 in that shed

http://kcfj570.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018-10-11t183425z-1041119715-rc18cff6aa30-rtrmadp-3-storm-michael.jpg

There’s a lot doing the rounds on social media at the moment about this. I don’t know the ground truth but reports suggest only 30+ of the F22s were flown out ahead of time. The rest, potentially around 20 or so were thought to be still in the hangars when it all got a bit windy.

Thats an awful lot of very expensive jets potentially scrapped in minutes in the worst case. Points to serious serviceability and poor availability rates if so many were u/s at one time. Questions no doubt to be asked if they have lost double digits worth of airframes.

RickNRoll
16th Oct 2018, 08:53
To fly them out they first of all have to be flyable. A lot of maintenance required for a state of the art military plane.

NutLoose
16th Oct 2018, 22:49
You will find this an interesting read

Setting The Record Straight On Why Fighter Jets Can't All Simply Fly Away To Escape Storms - The Drive (http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/24204/setting-the-record-straight-on-why-fighter-jets-cant-all-simply-fly-away-to-escape-storms)

RAFEngO74to09
17th Oct 2018, 18:36
Now confirmed by the Pentagon that 17 x F-22 could not be evacuated due to undergoing maintenance and lack of spares. It is currently estimated that "only a few" are beyond repair but the remainder will take "a long time" to repair.
The hangars were built to withstand 130 mph winds but the winds experienced were 150 mph+ and Tyndall AFB was in the eye of the storm.
Over 11,000 military personnel and families were evacuated prior and 867 housing units were damaged.

glad rag
17th Oct 2018, 18:46
What are the wind limits for a NATO Mk3 HAS? And how many F22's can you get in one??

gums
17th Oct 2018, 21:55
Salute!

Looks like we dodged the bullet over at Tyndall. I am 60 nm west and only had 30 mph winds, and no water due to my 60 feet MSL

Our U.S. weather agency has flown recce over the area at a thousand feet or so, and resolution of the photos is really good. It's a service for refugees to check on their property. One family had a "HELP" message in the yard that they made outta tree sections, heh heh. See: NOAA's National Ocean Service (https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/) for damage assessment. The helo tour Friday was very encouraging. Our local special ops runway repair/ clearing and combat control teams got over there and opened the runway by Friday night or early Saturday. Hell, over here we got Osprey's and all kinds of helos, plus Hercules and such.

One survivor over there has video he took when the eye went over the base, and it is eerie.
+++++++++++++++++++==
The base brings back fond memories, and my bride and I rented a cottage over in Mexico Beach when checking out in the VooDoo. It was paradise, and we wished that the program was a lot longer than two months.

Seciondly, at the end of training, I was over on an island in the bay for water survival and such when Hurricane Alma went ashore within 10 miles of this monster ( June 1966). The instructors evacuated us in the middle of the night on boats as the wind picked up. Scary. We suspected the move after hearing dozens and dozens of afterburners lighting up earlier in the night. They were flying the airworthy jets out.

Gums sends...

SASless
17th Oct 2018, 23:26
Now let's be honest....any average dunce could probably guess Tyndall AFB being nearly within spitting distance of the Gulf of Mexico might just possibly get hit by the odd Hurricane now and then......especially based upon past actual events.

It of course makes absolute sense to stash fifty or so very expensive and somewhat rare aircraft there.

Yes it makes for close proximity to the training areas and firing ranges....but being a bit further inland certainly would not work a real hardship for a commute to those areas.

You would think there would be some Generals reverting to Colonels over these kinds of decisions.

sandiego89
18th Oct 2018, 15:10
Now let's be honest....any average dunce could probably guess Tyndall AFB being nearly within spitting distance of the Gulf of Mexico might just possibly get hit by the odd Hurricane now and then......especially based upon past actual events.

It of course makes absolute sense to stash fifty or so very expensive and somewhat rare aircraft there.

Yes it makes for close proximity to the training areas and firing ranges....but being a bit further inland certainly would not work a real hardship for a commute to those areas.

You would think there would be some Generals reverting to Colonels over these kinds of decisions.

I think Senators and Member of Congress have more say on basing decisions than the good Generals and Colonels....

I do agree that some other bases would be better suited, with Nellis, Hill, several Texas bases and Marietta GA coming to mind....

ORAC
21st Jan 2019, 06:33
https://www.tampabay.com/breaking-news/tyndall-air-force-base-hit-by-tornado-20190120/

Tyndall Air Force Base hit by tornado

Tyndall Air Force Base, a key military base on Florida's panhandle, was hit by a tornado Saturday night — just three months after the base was devastated by Hurricane Michael.

gums
21st Jan 2019, 13:32
Salute!
From local TV station:
TYNDALL AFB, Fla. (WJHG/WECP) - UPDATE: The National Weather Service in Tallahassee has confirmed a tornado touched down at Tyndall Air Force Base Saturday night.
The report said an EF1 tornado with estimated peak winds of 90 mph "moved a car, broke car windows, tore a portion of a new roof off of barracks and flipped dumpsters and garbage cans on their sides." An EF1 tornado is described as being weak in nature.In a letter posted on Tyndall's Facebook, Colonel Laidlaw said the damage will not impact ongoing missions at the base.


So let's face it, it was like a Cat 1 hurricane but only two hundred yards or so wide, and no storm surge and was over in a minute versus a few hours of 120 - 150 mph winds they saw in October. This are and the numerous military bases have endured many hurricanes and are better prepared and structures are stronger than a lot of surrounding homes and businesses.

One squad of Raptors and the T-38's are over here at Eglin and rumor on the street is they will be here for a long time..
We have plenty of thunderstorms here in the Panhandle, and very strong ones.

Gums sends from the Panhandle...