Wondering why CAT III approaches are based only on the 2.5% MACG and not any other higher value like 3% etc
wiedehopf
18th Aug 2018, 22:21
There is an old thread here discussing something along those lines:
https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/445232-approach-climb-2-1-vs-macg-2-5-greater-2.html