PDA

View Full Version : Zunum: the Prius of business jets and short haul?


Lonewolf_50
14th Oct 2017, 17:54
Jet Blue and Boeing are funding a start up for a hybrid electric / turbine aircraft that is roughly bizjet /King Air in passenger capacity.

NEWS Boeing, JetBlue Invest in Electric Plane Startup | AIRLIVE.net (http://www.airlive.net/news-boeing-jetblue-invest-in-electric-plane-startup/)

What got my eyebrows raised was at the end: designed for single pilot, with "no pilot" options reserved for the future. The initial design target is a 700 mile range ( ~ 1120 km) with a 1000 mile (1600 km) range projected for around 2030. (I think the article got the range on the second one wrong, so I've corrected that).

I am puzzled: with that passenger capacity, and the cost of building some leading edge technology, what's the market that can support this (if it succeeds in meeting initial targets) beyond the business jet market? I am pretty sure I am missing something. Beyond the matters of scale, there is the cost of development and certification that one has to make up on the back end, as well as creating nodes/hubs where the batteries are charged or swapped out per the article's description. I looked at a few biz jets and note that in terms of range, this proposed model does not look competitive. (For example, a Gulfstream V carrying up to 14 pax has a 5000 mile range ... and the Cessna Citation about 2300 though I am not sure of the passenger load on that)

Is this realistic?

DaveReidUK
14th Oct 2017, 19:10
I looked at a few biz jets and note that in terms of range, this proposed model does not look competitive. (For example, a Gulfstream V carrying up to 14 pax has a 5000 mile range ... and the Cessna Citation about 2300 though I am not sure of the passenger load on that)

You can't expect a hybrid aircraft that's cruising at not much more than half the speed of a jet to have comparable range, when it would take nearly twice as long to get there.

tdracer
14th Oct 2017, 19:58
I suspect the target market is more like the Honda Jet and multi-thousand mile range isn't a requirement. GE is on record as saying their corporate Honda Jet is paying for itself in improved productivity and such (of course, as they are equity partners in Honda Jet, I wouldn't expect GE to say otherwise :rolleyes:)
Recall that the very long range business jet is a relatively new development.

aox
14th Oct 2017, 20:08
I looked up some numbers for the Pilatus PC-12. Up to nine passengers, very similar speed to the article's 10 seat version, about 1500 built.

Lonewolf_50
14th Oct 2017, 22:04
@aox Ok, maybe that's the target market, is the range about the same as the PC-12?

The Ancient Geek
15th Oct 2017, 00:12
There is a difference between single pilot and single pilot certified. Many (most?) jurisdictions require 2 pilots for commercial IFR operations, some permit this only with a small (often 8) number of pax.
The DHC6 Twin Otter is certified for single pilot operation but such operations are rare and usually VFR.

pattern_is_full
15th Oct 2017, 02:59
This is basically a proof-of-concept design - can a electric-drive aircraft meet specifications that are at least practical, if not currently (pun ;) ) competitive.

John Holland's first "electric boat" had a surface/hydrocarbon range of 200 nm, and a submerged-electric range of 30 (!) nm. Carried three torpedos and a cannon powered by dynamite (no kidding!). Not exactly inspiring - yet it eventually led to every practical war-making Pacific-crossing submarine of WW2 and beyond. You have to start somewhere, to investigate the technologies and discover and solve the problems.

Same for diesel-electric rail locomotives - 100 years ago they were only yard engines, but today they haul everything moved by rail in the US.

Even the FAA needs a functioning, flyable electric-drive aircraft available - to do a sensible job of writing (and perhaps modifying) rules for certification.

Will we see JetBlue operating a Boeing-electric 737 any time soon? No. Will we perhaps see a Boeing 73E7 in 60 years - that incorporates a lot of knowledge gained from getting the Zunum to function at a practical level today? We'll find out.

Fossil-fuel cars will be "out" in the EU and UK by 2040. Don't be under any illusions that regulators won't get around to banning most pure fossil-fuel aircraft eventually. Boeing and JetBlue are just planning ahead.

For the "9-seater," Zunum claims a target cost per ASM of 8¢ ($250/hour operating costs for fuel/batteries/charging power). Or just 20-33% the costs for a PC-12/KingAir.

Not to mention 65dB side-line engine noise at TO thrust,

Of note - the "next" step for Zunum (so they say) is something in the 19-seat segment. Then scaling up to 50-70 seats.

Lonewolf_50
15th Oct 2017, 16:34
@Pattern, thanks, that's very helpful and I've looked a bit more at their home page. 30 years ago, tilt rotor technology was trying to get a foot into the door of a similar market, (the brief I saw was for Japan) and the AW 609 is ... still a work in progress. I'll do some more digging around.

Cambridge172
16th Oct 2017, 10:37
I think the smaller concept demonstrator is very much the test case for getting back into the 19-seater and then 50-seater regional airliner market. Beyond that, aircraft weight/size-wise, it is not anticipated that electro-hybrid-ducted fan-type aircraft will have viability. So it's the smaller platforms that on paper at least look interesting. Batteries will or can be topped-up by turbine generators (a sort of APU), so the battery is not the one and only power source.

Although range is not significant, it's all about the incredible ops costs savings - in theory, when scaled up to the 50-seater class, those aircraft should be 80% cheaper to operate than current 50 seat turboprops.

ion_berkley
17th Oct 2017, 04:06
I am puzzled: with that passenger capacity, and the cost of building some leading edge technology, what's the market that can support this (if it succeeds in meeting initial targets) beyond the business jet market? I am pretty sure I am missing something. Beyond the matters of scale, there is the cost of development and certification that one has to make up on the back end, as well as creating nodes/hubs where the batteries are charged or swapped out per the article's description. I looked at a few biz jets and note that in terms of range, this proposed model does not look competitive. (For example, a Gulfstream V carrying up to 14 pax has a 5000 mile range ... and the Cessna Citation about 2300 though I am not sure of the passenger load on that)

Is this realistic?

At a guess, somebody is betting big on a new sector in the commercial airline business, rather than a traditional business jet market. The exponential growth of Surf Air seems to show it's a valid business model. A hybrid aircraft fits this flight profile ideally, short range, lots of cycles, issues of noise/pollution using non-traditional (GA style) airfields.

CappyJax
17th Oct 2017, 22:51
700 miles on 120 gallons carrying 9 passengers is very impressive!