Centaurus
24th Aug 2017, 10:03
https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/AT76,_vicinity_Taipei_Songshan_Taiwan,_2015?utm_source=SKYbr ary&utm_campaign=b9632cb26c-538_Engine_Malfunction_21_08_2017&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e405169b04-b9632cb26c-276530305
The flight was the third of four sectors for the flight crew consisting of two return flights from Songshan to Kinmen. Take-off from runway 10 was commenced with Captain 'A' as PF, Four seconds later, the PM stated that the Automatic Take-off Power Control System (ATPCS) was not armed. The PF responded that the take-off would continue which was acknowledged by the PM. After a further seven seconds, the PM advised that the ATPCS was now indicating 'armed' and the aircraft became airborne 11 seconds after that. The AP was engaged soon afterwards in LNAV and, at 115 knots, IAS modes.
............................................................ ...................................
Automation blind dependency strikes again - this time followed by mis-identification of engine failure resulting in both engines shut down.
The flight was the third of four sectors for the flight crew consisting of two return flights from Songshan to Kinmen. Take-off from runway 10 was commenced with Captain 'A' as PF, Four seconds later, the PM stated that the Automatic Take-off Power Control System (ATPCS) was not armed. The PF responded that the take-off would continue which was acknowledged by the PM. After a further seven seconds, the PM advised that the ATPCS was now indicating 'armed' and the aircraft became airborne 11 seconds after that. The AP was engaged soon afterwards in LNAV and, at 115 knots, IAS modes.
............................................................ ...................................
Automation blind dependency strikes again - this time followed by mis-identification of engine failure resulting in both engines shut down.