PDA

View Full Version : EK advertising on radio for pilots!


saddest aviator
23rd Mar 2017, 12:17
Whatever next. Emirates advertising on both LBC and Capital radio I believe for pilots. Never before have I heard of a company needing to use mainstream media to trawl for
pilots

judge11
23rd Mar 2017, 12:39
I think it fair to say the ME airlines are rapidly approaching the 'extremely desperate' stage. It's time for them to start paying Chinese rates and up the T&Cs (considerably) to attract anyone to the sandpit.

springbok449
23rd Mar 2017, 13:26
That is seriously desperate... only a few years ago they were the airline of choice in the Middle East things have certainly changed, you reap what you sow comes to mind!

Doug E Style
23rd Mar 2017, 15:43
That does sound desperate but there is clearly a limit to the number of people prepared to live/work in that part of the world. Could bases in other countries be in the pipeline? That would certainly attract a bigger pool of prospective employees. What next, adverts in the Job Centre?

Tay Cough
23rd Mar 2017, 19:00
£300k tax free, commuting contract, 777 command then I'm in.

... or a UK base.

Same money. :E

jumbodriver
23rd Mar 2017, 19:58
something approaching £300k would be what it would take for me as well-current package way way short...

samca
23rd Mar 2017, 20:26
Commuting contract is the key a part of the miney

RAFAT
24th Mar 2017, 04:04
They have cabin crew based in the UK (or they did) so why not pilots?

donpizmeov
24th Mar 2017, 04:13
They have never had cabin crew based in the UK.

harry the cod
24th Mar 2017, 04:29
They've never had cabin crew based in UK or any other Country apart from Dubai. All crew, pilots and cabin crew, live in UAE.

As for the package, 47,000 Dirhams per month is the starting salary for B777 Captains with required experience. Accommodation allowance is 16k per month if you choose to live out, another 6,000 per month education allowance per child up to maximum of 3. Just under 6,000 per month from The Company as Provident contribution. This is for line pilots, trainers will get more obviously. 70,000 is a conservative monthly ball park, excluding any overtime and education allowance. 840k Dhs per year is equivalent of £180K tax free, or £15,000 per month with current exchange rate (4.7). When relatively senior BA training guys take home around 10-11 after tax, the money is not the issue. A figure of £300k take home in UK is simply dreaming.

The issue at EK is not so much the money, but the work rate with unsustainable rosters, particularly on the B777. A380 F/O's are getting 15-16 days off every month, 95% are layovers. B777 skippers are doing 100 hours many months, 8-9 days off, 10 if you're lucky with a mix of night turns and layovers with some crappy timings. Most layovers are 24 hrs including home base, ironically the most tiring rest period and one 'recommended' in the ops manual to avoid.

People leave and not enough are joining. The package DOES need to be increased, simply to attract new joiners. More join, work becomes less, people stay. Part time may be on the horizon but only if the numbers increase. I can't see commuting contracts but desperate times call for desperate measures so you just never know.

The only thing that remains constant in this place is change!

springbok449
24th Mar 2017, 05:27
That's good and well balanced post Harry!

4468
24th Mar 2017, 09:19
Since BA has once again been dragged into a post about Emirates! Again!�� (I wonder why?)

Attempting to generalise senior BA training captain's take home pay is rather difficult. I know for a fact, some take home very significantly more than £180k. A top scale bog standard line pilot would do that if they lived in a tax free regime. Which more are doing, and the lifestyle allows. (They also spend less time commuting by air, than I do by car!)

They don't have to live in the sandpit either, nor work for middle eastern employers, with all the issues that entails!! Sounds to me like anyone working there for less than £300k is selling themselves short. No wonder people avoid the place like the plague, and people vote with their feet.

But I find Dubai a great place. To visit!

Monarch Man
24th Mar 2017, 09:50
4468, get off your high horse man. Do a few sums on 180k GBP tax free and figure it out. I'm not a trainer, nor do I do a lot of overtime, but Harry's assessment is correct in both financially terms and workload. My salary last year as a mid seniority 777 CPT was in the range of 160 GBP take home after deductions. The money isn't the issue, the workload is, hence the continued exodus.

wiggy
24th Mar 2017, 10:03
4468, get off your high horse man. Do a few sums on 180k GBP tax free and figure it out. I'm not a trainer, nor do I do a lot of overtime, but Harry's assessment is correct in both financially terms and workload. My salary last year as a mid seniority 777 CPT was in the range of 160 GBP take home after deductions. The money isn't the issue, the workload is, hence the continued exodus.

Agreed, FWIW as a bog standard line cpt with BA on the 777 my gross income last year was around 180k, i.e.similar to yours, and TBH I'm not sure how anyone at BA can avoid deductions/ tax, "commuter" or not...however the workload/rostering isn't anything like as nasty as it sounds at EK.

Tay Cough
24th Mar 2017, 10:13
When relatively senior BA training guys take home around 10-11 after tax, the money is not the issue. A figure of £300k take home in UK is simply dreaming.

Guess where I work. It's what it would take for me to move to the sandpit. :E

4468
24th Mar 2017, 10:15
Harry's assessment is correct
As is mine.

My question is, why do EK pilots ALWAYS drag BA into threads about EK??? Odd that isn't it?🙄

wiggy

If you don't know of BA pilots who can perfectly legally, earn tax free salary, whilst living in Europe, then you aren't talking to the right people!

If there's an exodus from EK, then I'm very glad I don't have to work there! Whatever the money, it clearly isn't worth it!

Why not turn over a new leaf chaps, and leave BA out of discussions about how crap EK is??

wiggy
24th Mar 2017, 10:23
Just to stop the "tax free" comments distorting further debate FWIW I live in Europe, do talk to people and I very much doubt any pilot in BA is earning a completely tax free salary ( regardless of where you reside at the UK end you will pay full NI, and HMRC always assess you annually for income tax based on your U.K. Duties ), though some may claim otherwise in the bar or on the jumpseat. That said I agree with:

Why not turn over a new leaf chaps, and leave BA out of discussions about how crap EK is??

Monarch Man
24th Mar 2017, 10:28
4468, the reason BA is used is because it is or was considered a benchmark by a lot of senior people here, or it used to be, given the numbers from the uk in various roles employed.
Backhanded as it may seem, I'd view BA being used as an example as a positive, at least we can hang on to that, rather than how wonderful Ansett used to be.
Maybe given time, you won't have to read much more about it on here 4468, the numbers of recruits from more "austere" locations and regulatory environments is definitely on the increase at EK...I even had occasion to remind the TRI on the flight deck that conversing in English rather than his native version meant I could understand what him and my F/O were discussing during our line check.

4468
24th Mar 2017, 10:38
Thanks MM.

I do get that.
I even had occasion to remind the TRI on the flight deck that conversing in English rather than his native version meant I could understand what him and my F/O were discussing during our line check.
Wow. In that case £300k is sounding about the right figure!

harry the cod
24th Mar 2017, 10:55
4468

Odd? No, not at all.

I was in no way deriding the salary at BA, far from it. BA is still seen as the benchmark within the UK and an airline that most UK based pilots would aspire to work for. Most, not all. The BA remuneration was provided as a reference for those expecting miracles and to drive home the most important message of this thread that it isn't just the money that attracts people. If an EK new joiner can take home 20-25% more then a fairly senior BA guy, does it not merely highlight what a problem EK is facing. I don't hear BA advertising on the radio, neither do I hear of an exodus of their pilots unlike Emirates.

Curiously, what airlines do your BALPA representatives use as a reference during the yearly pay negotiations, or are they too not allowed to 'drag' other airlines T&C's into a discussion? Not sure why the sensitivity but on a public forum, we're all fair game for comparison!

4468
24th Mar 2017, 11:04
Harry

I'm rather ashamed to say our BALPA representatives seem to use the exact same comparator airlines as BA management do. So Norwegian, Easy and Ryanair. I never hear BALPA seek to compare our package to legacy carriers in Europe, Middle/Far East, or the US!

Employer and union sing from a single song sheet!

Whilst there may not (yet) be an exodus from BA, far more people are moving elsewhere than I ever remember! The industry, or perhaps more accurately 'working for a living', appears to be in a downwards spiral!

The gap between workers and bosses can rarely have been greater in the modern age?

Perhaps we should console ourselves with the knowledge that we do at least remain as one of a group of more highly paid 'technical' workers? In reality we are just blue collar workers. Although there are white collar expectations of us?

cessnapete
24th Mar 2017, 12:32
Ref the pilot recruitment shortage, what have EK got against for example, a European aircrew Base? Surely that would attract people who do not want to live in Dubai.
Ok to visit but but not to live IMO!

donpizmeov
24th Mar 2017, 12:57
What a great idea Pete. How should they start it, applicable only for new joiners, and piss the established pilot group off? Or allow those already employed to take a base, and still not attract newbies?

4468
24th Mar 2017, 14:05
Now I'm getting confused!

From previous posts, I thought the entire attraction of EK was tax free status? (money)

But now you're suggesting there'd be a flood of current EK pilots desperate to pay tax, yet still work for an ME carrier, that doesn't even count bunk time as duty???

Tay Cough
24th Mar 2017, 15:12
If they based themselves in the UK, they'd have to pay UK employer taxes (NI etc) and abide by U.K. employment laws - one of which is 900 flying hours per year. :oh:

... and £300k tax free is roughly equivalent in the UK to about £180k tax paid. Therefore it equates to a "tax free" UK salary versus BA.

safelife
24th Mar 2017, 15:47
In China you can have 180k tax free, and commuting.

no sponsor
24th Mar 2017, 17:21
It appears that living in a certain European country, while working at BA, means you pay virtually no tax at all. All above board and with full declaration to the tax authorities of both countries. A significant number of people now live there, and easily commute to LHR for flying duties.

There's no point living in a :mad: hole while you're earning the same dosh you could be back in civilised countries.

wiggy
24th Mar 2017, 17:49
Be interesting to know which country......but maybe not ...

In any event FWIW you pay Full employees NI at BA, regardless of where you live, and even if you live outside the UK the HMRC will tax you on that proportion of your income earnt in the UK or UK airspace, so you are never going to be fully tax free.

There are some perhaps living in some principalties in Europe who legitimately pay no tax, there are alledgedly some living (perhaps under the radar) in places who have vague tax regimes, that is something that is perhaps easy for the singles to do and those with no kids but once you get family commitments it gets difficult if you are not fully embedded in the local system for healthcare, education, etc etc .

Many of the former tax "havens" have tightened up in the search for tax revenue, for example France started taxing foreign based aircrew a few years back, and certainly in many European countries you will be liable to their income tax as well as the UK's in some shape or form. Ultimately if anybody here is seriously thinking of joining BA + living in mainland Europe for tax purposes they need to take professional advice, not just the advice from someone who has heard a story from a guy that lives in XXX........and of course just to add to the mix there's the complication of Brexit, residence or not on mainland Europe for Brits and perhaps even complications on cross border working coming up.....

On another subject have to agree with 4468 that :

" BALPA representatives seem to use the exact same comparator airlines as BA management do. So Norwegian, Easy and Ryanair. I never hear BALPA seek to compare our package to legacy carriers in Europe, Middle/Far East, or the US!"

Doug E Style
24th Mar 2017, 19:26
It appears that living in a certain European country, while working at BA, means you pay virtually no tax at all. All above board and with full declaration to the tax authorities of both countries. A significant number of people now live there, and easily commute to LHR for flying duties.

Go on, give us a clue, cos it sure as :mad: ain't the one I live in.

Tay Cough
24th Mar 2017, 20:12
Only second hand (I don't live there) but I believe it's a place which prevents Spain from getting Atlantic weather. ;)

If it works, why not...

Boeing 7E7
24th Mar 2017, 20:24
Go on, give us a clue, cos it sure as :mad: ain't the one I live in.

I hope people from HMRC are following this thread! To avoid paying tax by legal or illegal means implies you are a leach on society. Naturally I'm sure the people that do it will be falling over themselves to justify it that somehow it's different for them...

3Greens
24th Mar 2017, 20:38
^what utter tripe. I suggest you research the country in question and the 10 year NHTR scheme before spouting such nonsense.

jumbodriver
24th Mar 2017, 21:53
Suggest we get back to the thread instead of getting sidetracked into the legitimate business of individuals who reside somewhere else and declare their tax there-wherever and whatever that jurisdiction is,jersey,iom,Guernsey,Switzerland,etc etc etc.the point is emirates aren't paying enough to attract what they need.

4468
24th Mar 2017, 22:27
Boeing 7E7

Do try restricting your comments to subjects with which you have knowledge. That way you don't have to come across as a total idiot!

Jinkster
25th Mar 2017, 02:24
Commuting contracts and UK resident means you can wipe 40% in tax off the package making it completely pointless being there unless they up the money an extra 40% to make it worth while.

safelife
25th Mar 2017, 02:50
Except when the place you work does tax your salary legally, does provide sound papers on that, and has a treaty on double taxation with your place.

FlightDetent
25th Mar 2017, 04:04
Which is the normal way of doing things, UK or not.

BBJ-Captain
25th Mar 2017, 07:03
Just to throw an observation point in regarding why BA comes up in threads about EK.
It's clear that most people in this thread are British, so BA is the most comparable operator.
Not to sure you can liken easyjet or Jet2, as their extensive long haul operations and fleets of A380 and B777 far exceed EK's!😜

So from a bystander point of view, BA is the only UK operation that can be compared for UK pilots. (Maybe Virgin if you squint your eyes a little)

GA F15
25th Mar 2017, 08:25
Commuting contracts and UK resident means you can wipe 40% in tax off the package making it completely pointless being there unless they up the money an extra 40% to make it worth while.

Commuting to/from the UK doesn't necessarily mean you will pay U.K. Tax.

As far as I understand it you can spend up to 90 days (or 120 days if you've not been UK resident for last 3yrs) if you have 2 ties (e.g. Family in UK and UK home). So 'IF' they were to offer a contract of 10 days off per month (for example), you won't obviously reach the 90 day limit until approx 9 months. After that I imagine holidays in somewhere other than the UK are a good idea!

I think you would also have to monitor your UK layover trips as there is a tie associated with that also.

harry the cod
25th Mar 2017, 08:29
Jinkster

There are quite a few pilots here in EK that either have sufficient finances not to care or, don't care about their finances. The point being that I know personally of at least 5 individuals who have children in the UK and are finding it very difficult to see them. It may be because of divorce or simply that the wife hasn't settled or they prefer the education in the UK. Either way, this puts massive pressure on them and may be the catalyst for seeking alternative employment.

Despite the tax, the package would still be good compared to most UK operators, including BA, but money would not be their overriding priority. Emirates must grasp the fact that the dynamics of it's pilot workforce has changed over the years, as has the raison d'être for many wanting to leave. It prides itself on expensive and fancy PR advertising, promoting innovation and technology, yet fails to apply those same core values to it's very own staff. If it is genuine about acknowledging value in its staff, it's doing a poor job in showing it. These issues have not been building surreptitiously amongst the pilot force but have been evident for quite a few years. A strong and effective management team would have recognised this and acted accordingly. The Company, for one reason or another, choose to turn a blind eye. It's now reaping what it ignored. Highly experienced pilots from both seats are leaving unnecessarily and being replaced by good but inexperienced pilots. Pilots who will not cut their teeth on 4 short haul sectors a day with experienced Captains, but will face an extensive Worldwide network into some for the most challenging and busy environments ever. They will fly with some demotivated and less experienced Captains who may have spent 25% of their 5 years in EK sleeping in a bunk. Whilst the dilution of experience has undetermined consequences, the outlook is not positive.

The problem we face is that while current management and their policies will probably be gone in five years from now, the impact of those short term policies will remain. As pilots, we'll have to manage that.

And it's that, that scares me.

wiggy
25th Mar 2017, 08:46
Commuting to/from the UK doesn't necessarily mean you will pay U.K. Tax.

As far as I understand it you can spend up to 90 days (or 120 days if you've not been UK resident for last 3yrs) if you have 2 ties (e.g. Family in UK and UK home). So 'IF' they were to offer a contract of 10 days off per month (for example), you won't obviously reach the 90 day limit until approx 9 months. After that I imagine holidays in somewhere other than the UK are a good idea!

I think you would also have to monitor your UK layover trips as there is a tie associated with that also.

Ah, no, that's not really the full story of how it works at BA - I'm really sorry to deviate the thread again folks but at the risk of boredom we need to kill this persistent "no tax in the U.K." story and similar rumours, the underpinning legislation for most of this is ITEPA 2003 section 690, but I'll try a quick explanation.

As a starter I've been "commuting" from the mainland EU for over 15 years and am on the "radar" at both ends (i.e. two tax returns a year) ....so what follows isn't a half heard rumour, bar room/ jumpseat BS or friend of a friend rumour stuff, this is pretty much how it works, at least for the Brits working at BA, operating out of LHR or LGW but living elsewhere in the EU.

The " 90/120 days " rule and other ties referred to are used determine if you are resident in the U.K. for tax purposes..if you are deemed resident you are assessed for income tax etc on all your salary at BA....period.

OTOH if you duck under the 90/120 days criteria and avoid other ties with the UK you can be deemed "non resident for tax purposes." ...but that is not a tax free status, certainly the Brits "commuting" are still liable for full, 100%, Employees UK National Insurance (NI, the social charge on wages) and they also pay income tax on that proportion of salary deemed to have been earnt in the U.K. and UK airspace,. FWIW I spend maybe 20 - 30 full days in the UK per annum at most, have absolutely no other U.K. ties but still pay full NI and some UK income tax.

So in conclusion and to emphasise the non-resident Brits at BA I know of pay full NI and also pay U.K. Income tax on a percentage of their salary.....it is a favourable regime but it is definitely not the "no tax, no Social Charge deductions" regime some seem to think.

Now if one wants to argue about taxation at "the other end", i.e. in the country of residence that is down to local rules, the bi-lateral agreements and is a fast changing game at the moment. If you end up in one of the many countries in Europe where you pay local social charges and are assessed for "local" income tax ( which ultimately is usually reduced under the bi- lateral agreement by the amount already paid to the U.K HMRC) it can be a close call as to whether you are better off being non resident or not, so you need to do your homework and take professional advice.

Sorry to deviate the thread again with a long post but I hope that helps and hopefully we can put the tax issue at the UK end "to bed".

Tay Cough
25th Mar 2017, 12:16
These issues have not been building surreptitiously amongst the pilot force but have been evident for quite a few years. A strong and effective management team would have recognised this and acted accordingly. The Company, for one reason or another, choose to turn a blind eye.

Is TCAS still there? :E

harry the cod
25th Mar 2017, 19:04
Tay Cough

Compulsory retirement at 65 but went to Emirates Aviation College to head up the training for cadets. Served one year then his yearly contract was not renewed.

back to Boeing
25th Mar 2017, 19:42
Didn't he do a runner with the bonus money? 26 million is a figure I hear (not sure if dirhams or dollars)

bex88
25th Mar 2017, 21:09
Did I really read this right. LH captains at BA with mid seniority are earning 160-180k take home a year? Wow.....wow. Yep I am junior P1 but for me it was £64k. I know PP34 vs PP24 and early command make a big difference but still.

Would I go to the Middle East for £180k tax free and ditch out a career path at BA for a job with Emirates? Maybe but it's obviously not the money which is keeping me at BA.

wiggy
25th Mar 2017, 21:50
Nope, that sounds wrong to me as well. I reckon a senorish LH pp24 non trainer non manager non overtime working captain in BA might gross 160k to 180k but as I think we have now done to death that is not "take home" pay, certainly not in the U.K.....

Piltdown Man
26th Mar 2017, 00:45
Only when EK and every other airline short of pilots realises that these guys don't work for money will they be able to recruit and retain sufficient numbers. For pilots, the sweet spot is probably as you pass the net £100-120 mark, if you can live where you want. Add in flexible and part time rostering with commuting rosters and a civilised FDM procedures and proper training culture and you'll have to beat applicants off with a :mad: stick.

But at the moment moment, there is a shortage for good reasons and it's not the money. I'll start with some. Some office **** thinks it's a good idea that their employees write nasty little reports on their colleagues. Some people can't fly and aircraft to save their lives, yet have commands of long haul, wide bodied ones for some a reason. Others want training that doesn't involve unreasonable jeopardy. Some don't like the climate where their employer is based. etc.

4468
26th Mar 2017, 00:52
wiggy

Now you're really pushing it! A pp24 LH captain grossing £160k? Have you checked the payscales recently? Maybe if they're LTS!!

Look. It seems you know about your own circumstances, obviously! But you don't know mine, or my close friends.

TBH, anyone including school fees in their ME income, or housing allowance, (because they have no choice but to pay them!) is trying to pull the wool over people's eye!

Iver
26th Mar 2017, 02:21
Surprising that EK can't find sufficient numbers of Indian pilots meeting their minimum hours requirements... I imagine plenty of GoAir, Indigo and Spicejet pilots would love the EK package and a move to Dubai....

propaganda
26th Mar 2017, 03:52
Advertising on the wrong radio stations then.

wiggy
26th Mar 2017, 05:04
wiggy

Now you're really pushing it! A pp24 LH captain grossing £160k??? Have you checked the payscales recently?? Maybe if they're LTS!!


Having looked at back not at pay scales but at my own BA payslips (LH pp24) figures for total Gross payment at the end of the month ( so that is salary plus flying pay or whatever we have now, plus allowances, no significant sickness) for the last two years I'd stand by my figure as being roughly in the ballpark.. trainers earn more, some of those clever with "overtime" might be above the norm, but otherwise it's 160k to 180k Gross....


Look. It seems you know about your own circumstances, obviously! But you don't know mine, or my close friends.

Ouch ....before bowing out dare I ask what I've said that seems to have hit a nerve. I made a hopefully generic post about UK expat taxation and a couple of generic post/responses about pp24 pay. I may disagree with you on some points but I am not sure why you think I've posted something aimed at you or your friends.

donpizmeov
26th Mar 2017, 11:19
Soon EK will be leaving those cards you find in the phone boxes frequented by those £180k tax free Nigel commuters. For a good time ride EK with provocative picture of a half naked 380. Should work a treat :)

Superpilot
26th Mar 2017, 13:34
How much does EK spend on expat pilot housing, health and education? That would be an interesting number. Swap that for a less frantic schedule or commuting roster (or both) and I may just join (at some point within the next 30 years).

flyhigh85
26th Mar 2017, 19:35
That bunk time at EK does not count is beyond me! Say u do some ultra longhaul flights with 4 pilots, then you will spend around 40% time in the bunk, then there is a training flight so again 4 pilots on the flights and 40 % percent in the bunk which u do not get credit for. Then u do a day with short sectors only 2 pilots but really working hard. Add Jetlag, nightflight/dayflight etc it sounds like a real killer. On top of that u live in a hot muslim country where the girls are well not my style.. Money is surely not everything.. BTW who cares about BA on this thread.

Craggenmore
27th Mar 2017, 02:39
I've no idea why BA is in this thread either.

Ones a full service airline with an ultramodern fleet and the other is more or less these days a low cost airline with few perks, copying EasyJet and Ryanair on short haul and cheap ass Norwegian on long haul.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/26/bring-back-my-old-british-airways?CMP=share_btn_fb

RexBanner
27th Mar 2017, 07:40
Craggenmore for the punters you're more or less correct but as this thread is about pilot conditions I think it's only right to mention an airline where you're actually credited for time spent in the bunk and where you get more than a 24hr layover for the majority of destinations. 24hours rest (which I'm told actually turns out to be less) after a DXB-JFK is absolutely insane IMHO and bordering on the criminal.

harry the cod
27th Mar 2017, 09:38
BA vs EK is not what we should be pursuing here. The reason why BA was included has already been explained. It is not to say one is better than the other, but to highlight salary is not the sole reason for retaining or attracting new employees. The thread drift into tax does have some bearing as it effects net pay. That, ultimately, is what we see in our accounts. If they're advertising on UK radio, it may effect those intending to remain 'residing' there.

Rex

Some of the shorter layovers are indeed difficult and 24hrs is never the easiest rest period to use. However, the shorter layovers are desirable for some pilots, myself included, as it means more time at home rather than on layover. I also believe that BA too has a few back to back US trips and have less restrictive scheme rules than, say, 20 years ago? As for the bunk time, it's 75% credit on 4 man ULR's. You get all of the 'operating sector' and half of the 'augmenting sector'. All of it's paid but 25% is not credited as flying hours. Can't say I agree with it though.

4468

If you're referring to my post, perhaps a re read might be in order. I never included the education allowance into the 70k dirhams figure. This is because there may be some pilots without need for such an allowance. Those that do have their children privately educated would have just over £15,000 per year, per child. With 3 children, that's £45,000 NET per annum. For a UK higher rate tax payer, that would have to be some income to come out with that figure each year. As for the accommodation allowance, yes, it was included. It's £40,000 NET, also per annum, that the Company gives you for moving out of free housing and doing what you and most other pilots do, pay a mortgage on your own property. Or you can stay for free with all bills and utilities covered. At least there is a choice.

However, the current standard of concentration style campus probably isn't a patch on your own Country estate in York! ;) And no, I'm not being facetious, I really do mean it!

RexBanner
27th Mar 2017, 09:59
Some of the shorter layovers are indeed difficult and 24hrs is never the easiest rest period to use. However, the shorter layovers are desirable for some pilots, myself included, as it means more time at home rather than on layover. I also believe that BA too has a few back to back US trips and have less restrictive scheme rules than, say, 20 years ago?

Absolutely. But they're not on the back of a 14 hour flight.

(Unless you're talking about Cape Town or Jo'burg of course but no time zones crossed there).

harry the cod
27th Mar 2017, 17:24
Strangely, it's probably the 48 hr layovers that are the silent killers on our ULR's. They may assist rest on layovers, but are actually detrimental to recovery back at home base? It's on the 2nd or 3rd day the jet lag hits, normally just before you're about to go flying again!

JW411
27th Mar 2017, 17:30
I would happily believe that. 48-hour layovers were great socially-wise but you started to get into local time. 24-hours was actually kinder in the end and made adjustment when you got back home much easier.

Tay Cough
27th Mar 2017, 17:50
I also believe that BA too has a few back to back US trips ...

No company-constructed B2Bs for many many years (pretty much since the demise of the 747-200). No US B2Bs at all since EASA as the company is reluctant to pay for a hotel at LHR and has applied some conditions. It remains possible to do what used to be known as a B2B with an Africa as the first trip as it does not count as a B2B in EASA due to a minimal time change on the first rotation.

harry the cod
28th Mar 2017, 04:22
Our forever changing requirements are akin to Manchester's 'infamous' rain. You know it's definitely going to happen, you just don't know when!

The way things are going, a Cessna 402 rating and a pulse will be enough to get you an interview soon.

Transformers
28th Mar 2017, 08:18
Its important for every ex-EK pilot and current to attend these roadshows and educate both the recruiters and the future employee's so they get the "FULL REAL BIG PICTURE".

Not the B/S about how life in Dubai is great etc...........!

Fly Safely my fellow Desdi Zoombee's............! :uhoh:

dan1165
28th Mar 2017, 12:27
Pilot in Sydney, Brisbane, Perth WA - P1 (http://www.aviationjobsearch.com/job/pilot-245/8700873)

Ollie Onion
29th Mar 2017, 00:08
I have had 4 requests in the last three days on LinkedIn to add to my network pilots who's job is listed as Emirates Pilot recruitment specialist. So things must be getting desperate, give me a commutable roster and I would consider it.

Deep and fast
29th Mar 2017, 08:48
I see AL the ex head recruitment guy found a more for filing role.
Shame as EK would suit my personal circumstances but I'm not gonna work myself to an early grave.