underfire
4th Jan 2017, 00:04
For those of us who were wondering about the decision to order 737-700's....
"In early 2016, legacy carrier United Continental (NYSE:UAL) surprised investors by ordering 65 737-700 aircraft from Boeing (NYSE:BA). Industry analysts concluded that Boeing had offered United an extremely low price, perhaps as low as $22 million per aircraft, a 73% discount to the list price. (Discounts of around 50% are more typical.)
On Tuesday, United Continental shocked investors again. Management revealed that United no longer wants these Boeing 737s -- and that they weren't as cheap as most third-party observers had guessed, anyway."
In conjunction with its investor day on Tuesday, United Continental announced that it no longer wants these 737-700s. It has converted four orders to the larger -- and much more cost-efficient -- 737-800. The other 61 orders will be deferred indefinitely and converted to the new 737 MAX."
http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/11/16/about-those-cheap-boeing-737s-united-continental-d.aspx
"In early 2016, legacy carrier United Continental (NYSE:UAL) surprised investors by ordering 65 737-700 aircraft from Boeing (NYSE:BA). Industry analysts concluded that Boeing had offered United an extremely low price, perhaps as low as $22 million per aircraft, a 73% discount to the list price. (Discounts of around 50% are more typical.)
On Tuesday, United Continental shocked investors again. Management revealed that United no longer wants these Boeing 737s -- and that they weren't as cheap as most third-party observers had guessed, anyway."
In conjunction with its investor day on Tuesday, United Continental announced that it no longer wants these 737-700s. It has converted four orders to the larger -- and much more cost-efficient -- 737-800. The other 61 orders will be deferred indefinitely and converted to the new 737 MAX."
http://www.fool.com/investing/2016/11/16/about-those-cheap-boeing-737s-united-continental-d.aspx