.Scott
11th Nov 2016, 12:07
About a month ago, Oct 7, FullWings posted this:It’s getting to the point where there’s not much to be gained from further snippets on MH370. It crashed into the sea, it was almost definitely suicide, everybody’s dead, move along.If we accept the "almost certainly suicide" assessment, then we have our lesson learned. We have another demonstration of the important safety implications of crew mental health and perhaps more impetus to address that area with more scrutiny.
Personally, I have never subscribed to the suicide theory. As an engineer, I am very familiar with equipment failing in surprising and unexpected ways. Out of the many scores of simulations the pilot ran on his home simulator, one ran out into the Indian Ocean - as though he was distracted from his practice session and didn't get back to it until the simulation had run its full course. Given a cockpit fire and no recovery of the wreckage or the recording, in how many of your flights would this level of "evidence" for suicide be found simply as a matter of happenstance?
Earlier today, a Mick Gilbert posted his analysis and interpretation of positioning data received from MH370 while it was in the vicinity of Banda Aceh. The raw data is more detailed than I have seen before. The positioning analysis is also more complete than I have seen before. As for his interpretation, I will leave that to others on this forum with more experience in this type of flying.
His article is here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbakv38v2y0g1zy/Exploring%20The%20First%20Log-On%20-%20Phone%20Call%20Gap%20V3.2.pdf?dl=0
If you're not into that much detail, here's an article on his article:https://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2016/11/11/61373/
The gist of the article is that, during the time MH370 was near Banda Aceh, before its excursion into the Indian Ocean, many flight paths are possible. But by making reasonable assumptions, few paths are likely - and these most likely paths bear on the situation in the cockpit and the cause of the disaster.
Personally, I have never subscribed to the suicide theory. As an engineer, I am very familiar with equipment failing in surprising and unexpected ways. Out of the many scores of simulations the pilot ran on his home simulator, one ran out into the Indian Ocean - as though he was distracted from his practice session and didn't get back to it until the simulation had run its full course. Given a cockpit fire and no recovery of the wreckage or the recording, in how many of your flights would this level of "evidence" for suicide be found simply as a matter of happenstance?
Earlier today, a Mick Gilbert posted his analysis and interpretation of positioning data received from MH370 while it was in the vicinity of Banda Aceh. The raw data is more detailed than I have seen before. The positioning analysis is also more complete than I have seen before. As for his interpretation, I will leave that to others on this forum with more experience in this type of flying.
His article is here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wbakv38v2y0g1zy/Exploring%20The%20First%20Log-On%20-%20Phone%20Call%20Gap%20V3.2.pdf?dl=0
If you're not into that much detail, here's an article on his article:https://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2016/11/11/61373/
The gist of the article is that, during the time MH370 was near Banda Aceh, before its excursion into the Indian Ocean, many flight paths are possible. But by making reasonable assumptions, few paths are likely - and these most likely paths bear on the situation in the cockpit and the cause of the disaster.