PDA

View Full Version : Shoreham-by Sea hit again


arthur05
18th Jul 2016, 12:57
Just seen this in local rag

Two hurt after plane crash lands at airport (From The Argus) (http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/14625806.UPDATE__Two_hurt_after_plane_crash_lands_at_airport/?ref=mr&lp=1)

surely not
19th Jul 2016, 09:15
What a ridiculous thread header.

This is a totally different situation to the crash at the air show last year. The aircraft is not destroyed by fire and no one died. A sense of perspective is missing from your thread title.

Good news that there were no serious injuries

Chris Kebab
19th Jul 2016, 10:24
You're too polite surely not - moronic is what I would call it:mad:

Sir Niall Dementia
19th Jul 2016, 10:30
That aeroplane is an old friend; sad to see her like that. I know the headline says two injured, I hope none of the injuries are bad.

SND

Inverted pilot
19th Jul 2016, 11:28
Do you work for the tabloids ? We can all do without the drama in your title thread thanks. It's bad enough the local rags making a meal of it there's no need for fellow pilots with a vested interest in general aviation ( I hope ) Jumping on the band wagon as well. Think before you type people. This is our passion and in some cases livelyhoods your slamming with mindless comments. A simple "Bumpy take off goes pear shaped " would have been a perfectly suitable title numb nuts.

JW411
19th Jul 2016, 11:46
It wasn't a forced landing. It was a normal landing that went horribly wrong.

Parson
19th Jul 2016, 12:15
I wish the term 'crash lands' could be eradicated from journalists vocabulary - a plane either crashes or lands (possibly badly, possibly forced) but not both. A plane crashing will have impacted Mother Earth (unless mid air as well) and so by definition it will have 'landed'.

That and 'the pilot swooped at the last minute to avoid a school/hospital/housing estate/(add what you wish)' - no comment necessary.

Do these clowns ever actually interview pilots?

Jan Olieslagers
19th Jul 2016, 12:58
Another source reports "no injuries" so perhaps the unfortunate crew were only taken to hospital for verification ,before being returned to service?

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=188734

PS agree that "crash landing" is ridiculous vocabulary. But no the clowns do not know what they're talking about, and it seems to get only worse with time. Have you heard the UK's new foreign affairs minister made an "emergency landing" at Luton on his way to Brussels?

Flyingmac
19th Jul 2016, 16:05
For a slightly slanted Press report, try this. No comment on the 25+ emergency vehicles. (See photo).
Breighton helicopter crash: Worried residents fear more accidents | Hull Daily Mail (http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/breighton-helicopter-crash-worried-residents-fear-more-accidents/story-29523872-detail/story.html)

Parson
19th Jul 2016, 21:09
Just looked at that - "a lot of stunts from both the planes and the helicopters" Oh for goodness sake....