PDA

View Full Version : PT6 replacing


laurenson
21st Oct 2015, 08:21
Could GE with a new 2000hp turboprop dethrone PT6 after its 60 year of domination?

GE Could Build 2,000 thp GA Turboprop Engine | Oshkosh 2015 content from Aviation Week (http://aviationweek.com/oshkosh-2015/ge-could-build-2000-thp-ga-turboprop-engine)

GE Aviation to Create European Turboprop Center of Excellence to Pursue Non-U.S. Options to Secure Export Credit Financing for Customers (http://www.aviationpros.com/press_release/12115619/ge-aviation-to-create-european-turboprop-center-of-excellence-to-pursue-non-us-options-to-secure-export-credit-financing-for-customers)

Cubs2jets
21st Oct 2015, 10:09
A 2000 HP turboprop would be in a completely different class than the 450 to 1800 HP PT-6 wouldn't it?

With new technology, new designs are always a possibility and a turboprop in this class with greater efficiency can be made. But can it compete with the maturity and reliability?

C2j

barit1
21st Oct 2015, 21:00
When the PT6 first appeared in the 60s it was essentially a replacement for the venerable R-1340 Wasp, about 40 years old at the time. Economics and emissions and noise were the drivers.

So now, another 50 years along, the cycle repeats. :)

laurenson
22nd Oct 2015, 10:02
The PT6 are already closed the 2000hp, for instance PT6A-68C was declared around 1960shp. Moreover, it could be a good opportunity to develop an entire new family.
However, I fully agree about your questioning, new technologies and new design will help to develop a better engine with greater the fuel consumption and specific power, but the reliability reaches by the PT6 after billions of fight hours will be hard to equal.

barit1
22nd Oct 2015, 12:54
but the reliability reaches by the PT6 after billions of fight hours will be hard to equal.

In the aviation marketplace 50 years ago, similar words applied to the R-1340, R-985, etc.

tdracer
22nd Oct 2015, 14:04
The big new turbofans (GEnx, Trent 1000) are demonstrating out-of-the-box reliability that is significantly better than the "mature" rates of the 1970's designs (GEnx shutdown rate is ~1-2/million hours). The modern design tools are much better than what was available 40 years ago - so it doesn't take a couple decades of service to 'mature' the design.