PDA

View Full Version : Intercept by RAF Typhoons and escort to STN


captplaystation
29th Oct 2014, 16:54
Picking up a fairly serious incident on 121.5.

Can't hear the call sign but the Interceptors are telling the intercepted aircraft that if he doesn't respond to the instructions of her majesties government he is instructed to shoot him down :ooh:


Minimum someone is in deep deep doo doo (or incapacitated) or it is something more sinister. . . . Oh well, I shall monitor 121.5 & watch the news as I travel Southwards.

tubby linton
29th Oct 2014, 17:11
Any idea where in the FIR? Lots of reports of a sonic boom in the West Kent area, probably from an interceptor.

G-AZUK
29th Oct 2014, 17:13
suggested perpetrator MTL1605 an AN26 reg YL-RAA

Rocket Ron
29th Oct 2014, 17:17
Sonic boom heard at STN, and just heard sound of fighter pass downwind.

INeedTheFull90
29th Oct 2014, 17:17
Seems to have taken a shar turn toward west London before going into STN.

captplaystation
29th Oct 2014, 17:23
Yep, that was the one call sign Mitavia, they started to get excited when he was a bit away from Lydd.

Less Vodka with the crew meal would always be a prudent recommendation.

TurboTomato
29th Oct 2014, 17:33
Reports from my better half over in Tunbridge Wells of sonic boom and apparently many other places in West Kent.

captplaystation
29th Oct 2014, 17:35
Now you are going to think I am a "spotter" :p however, in good pprune tradition, I have to post this



http://e1.photos.flightcdn.com/photos/retriever/532b40fa4a9dfe9ae9820707e07f138050b77fd5

Super VC-10
29th Oct 2014, 17:38
I heard the sonic boom too. Reported heard over much of West Kent. Time was approx 16:40 UTC.

Fzz
29th Oct 2014, 18:08
Tweet from RAF: (https://twitter.com/RoyalAirForceUK/status/527517938056966144)

"Typhoons launched to intercept a civil aircraft. It was safely escorted to Stansted. Our aircraft cleared supersonic during the scramble."

newjourno
29th Oct 2014, 18:14
Someone apparently recorded the ATC message from a Typhoon to the plane. Chilling to hear: https://soundcloud.com/egxwinfo-gr-up/qra-warning-from-raf-typhoons-to-mitavia1605-291014

JAR
29th Oct 2014, 18:33
BBC News - RAF jets intercept Lithuanian cargo plane over Kent (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-29823148)

captplaystation
29th Oct 2014, 18:37
newjourno,

exactly as I heard it live, certainly sent a shiver down my spine. . . . :uhoh:

Straighten Up
29th Oct 2014, 18:38
That phrase probably woke them up sharpish.

Lonewolf_50
29th Oct 2014, 19:09
Police said all three people on board had been spoken to and it was established everything was in order.
Happy ending.

SpringHeeledJack
29th Oct 2014, 19:42
Heard the louder noise signature around London, thought it unusual so checked with FR24 and only thing to see was an AN26 making an a strange hook to the west. Also strange was that the normal drone of the Antonov was missing. Perhaps it was the stealth version ;)

MATELO
29th Oct 2014, 20:12
Unresponsive aircraft flying directly towards the middle of London.


No surprises they were authorised to go supersonic & use lethal force if necessary.

Big Tudor
29th Oct 2014, 20:17
Happy ending.

Unless you are one of the three crew involved. Suspect they may have a lot of report writing coming up.

"Ah, captain. Come in. No, don't take you hat off. Or sit down!"

TEEEJ
29th Oct 2014, 20:24
Sonic boom recording at following link.

RAF Jets Threaten To Shoot Down Cargo Plane (http://news.sky.com/story/1362888/raf-jets-threaten-to-shoot-down-cargo-plane)

mrflyman
29th Oct 2014, 21:37
Heard this on 121.5 over france earlier today, thought it was some kind of exercise! Surprised when read the beeb on landing.

Booglebox
29th Oct 2014, 22:11
If nothing has changed in the last few years, the crew of that thing are Estonian with pretty poor English, which might be a contributing factor.

Straighten Up
29th Oct 2014, 22:45
LiveLeak.com - RAF Typhoons threatened to shoot down a Latvian cargo plane (comments)

I've seen the Typhoon at a few airshows and always amazed by it's dexterity. Watching this though I wondered what the "normall" initial pitch angle is for a scramble - looks like 60+%.

Also wondering what altitude they would normally whizz from Lincs to Kent at?

Love the aircraft - you are some lucky people who get to fly it!

Rossoneri
29th Oct 2014, 23:38
Also wondering what altitude they would normally whizz from Lincs to Kent at?

Typically FL400+. That's before they switch off their Mode C.....

AirScotia
30th Oct 2014, 00:42
At what point was the intercept made, does anyone know? The Flightradar track shows the Antonov trundling up to Heathrow at 18,000ft, then making a sharp right turn.

How could the pilots possibly have ended up that close to Heathrow without realising they'd missed a few conversations with ATC?

And what on earth would the Typhoons have done if it had looked like the An was planning something hostile? Shoot it down over Lambeth or Hounslow?

captplaystation
30th Oct 2014, 01:35
I was privileged to listen to the whole thing "live" , I offered to help when I initially heard ATC on 121.5 failing to establish contact, but they said the aircraft they were trying to contact was close to Lydd, so well within the range of their transmitters (London)

It does indeed seem incredible that they could just blunder into the London TMA without contact, as if that were the normal way, I can only hope for them a total radio failure (unlikely as that may be ) as it is difficult to fathom how they could have imagined that everything was OK. If they were flying in the area reported, I think the chance to shoot them down (as threatened) must have been lost quite early in proceedings, as most of their route after coasting in was over populated/heavily populated areas.

Having spent some time flying in a Baltic (previously Soviet) country, I am open to believing that the mentality required for this to happen could well be present on the flight deck.

I guess, if it actually managed to get as far as Heathrow (as alleged here) serious questions will be asked in the house of "Her Majesties Govt" as, if something sinister was planned, that (with respect) would be a bit too late.



If you look at the following two links, you can see why (and who to blame) for this "edginess" from the R.A.F.


http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-29823148

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29825890

Out Of Trim
30th Oct 2014, 02:03
A shame we don't have a Southern Q at RAF Wattisham anymore!

Fighter aircraft could have been alerted and on scene even earlier, and before the Target had reached Greater London.

Although they managed to get on scene pretty quickly, perhaps it would have been a little late with a higher performance aircraft than a mere Turboprop!

A lesson learnt perhaps? :(. But, probably Not!

tartare
30th Oct 2014, 02:14
In a former life, flew the Typhoon sim at Farnborough on 24 July 2000.
Man, that thing can accelerate.
The test pilot (grey hair?) stood next to me as I carefully handled the throttles and said "you've just gone supersonic and broken a large number of windows in the South East..."

DaveReidUK
30th Oct 2014, 07:27
At what point was the intercept made, does anyone know? The Flightradar track shows the Antonov trundling up to Heathrow at 18,000ft, then making a sharp right turn.

"Tracks" on FlightRadar24 for aircraft that, like this one, don't have ADS-B should be treated with extreme caution.

Think "join-the-dots", but with many of the dots missing ...

KelvinD
30th Oct 2014, 08:42
This whole affair and others like it, baffle me.
From my limited experience with ATC (maintaining nav aids & comms in Saudi), I remember flight plans preceded a flight so the relevant FIR would be aware of what was coming, from where etc with approximate times planned for various reporting points. So there should be no surprises when aircraft appear. I agree it is bloody awkward when there is no communication with the aircraft. I once watched a Syrian Airlines flight from Damascus to Jeddah being forced to land at Tabuk as it was 1 minute late reporting entering Saudi airspace!
Meanwhile, London reported no comms with the aircraft on 121.5MHz, yet the RAF called him on that frequency. Nevertheless, once the Typhoons had caught up with him, presuming they established comms on that frequency, could they not then instruct the pilot to contact London on the correct frequency?
Finally, this business of threatening to shoot down aircraft that could be construed as posing a threat to urban area etc; the UK is not a vast area. So, imagine shooting down an aircraft approaching London after deciding it posed a threat to the city? "Oops! He has crashed in docklands". Job done as far as the terrorist is concerned. During the Olympics, the government posted anti-aircraft batteries near to the Olympic venues so they could shoot down aircraft posing a 9/11 type of threat. And where would they come down? Blow it up over Dartford and watch a couple of 5 ton engine lumps flying in a ballistic arc toward London anyway? (Shades of the Buccaneer!)

Coochycool
30th Oct 2014, 09:49
And I just love how that old crate's got raf painted on the side. You couldnt make it up

But it must have really made the Tiffy pilots wonder what they were dealing with :ooh:

Rossoneri
30th Oct 2014, 10:19
The a/c was intercepted before it got to London. It was just making landfall.

There was a flight plan in the system, so the flight wasn't a surprise. If the previous controllers had lost comms with the a/c, obviously we are reliant on them informing us before it gets to our airspace. Occasionally, adjacent units will let the situation progress further than perhaps we would before saying anything. The a/c could well have reached the normal transfer of communications point without the sector being pre-noted there was a potential radio fail, or loss of comms. This obviously delays the QRA launch by a few minutes.

However, the pilot was intercepted well before overflying significant urban areas, and showed compliance in following orders.

ManaAdaSystem
30th Oct 2014, 17:14
London could not contact him on 121.5?
Often when I fly in on near UK airspace, 121.5 is turned down due Practice Pan, Practice Pan, Practice Pan.
A fighter outside my left cockpit window will change that, but by then it is too late.

Fortissimo
30th Oct 2014, 17:48
The warning on 121.5 is exactly the same as happens with any 'armed guard' challenge, the law requires the giving of a warning unless there is no time to do so. In this case there was time, and you will note the warning was issued on behalf of the Govt.

The flight plan will assist with identification of an aircraft provided the contact is close to the planned or approved route. What it will not tell you (in the absence of comms) is that all is well on board. And if you have identified an aircraft via the flight plan and then the track behaviour is no longer as expected, you have an aircraft that is potentially hostile until it is proved otherwise.

The decision to engage is clearly a tough one but it will not be taken in the cockpit for a scenario like this. Let us assume 'the system' has decided the aircraft is hostile and has hostile intent. If you do shoot it down over an urban area there is a good chance of casualties on the ground, but there is also a chance wreckage drops into roads, parks, gardens etc. If you let it proceed to its target, you have absolute certainty of a terrorist success. Therein lies the difference.

ILS27LEFT
30th Oct 2014, 18:47
We definitely need a number of RAF fighter jets/Typhoon positioned significantly closer to the area most at risk of a 9/11 style attack, we cannot take the risk of being on a hostile target too late, no way. In NORAM they were very late and we know exactly why.:mad:
:ugh:

ShotOne
3rd Nov 2014, 14:45
What would be the point of that, c195?

ILS27, think through the threat scenario in detail and then say whether your proposal would make us any safer. In that scenario we need a team of hostiles ruthless and well-trained enough to: a) hijack an airliner by force b) do it so quickly that there's no chance, not even 5 seconds, for an RT distress call c) pilot and navigate aircraft to destination/target...All that, but NOT be able to make a few radio calls. Would any number of Typhoons even based at LHR make us safer?

deptrai
3rd Nov 2014, 15:11
I agree that any additional number of fast jets based wherever is not going to make us considerably safer.

a) hijack an airliner by force b) do it so quickly that there's no chance, not even 5 seconds, for an RT distress callUnfortunately safety measures tend to be reactive, based on past experiences. The next "hostile" can not be expected to do exactly the same as previous ones. Instead of going through the considerable pain of hijacking, if I was a "hostile", I'd consider leasing one of the many inexpensive older a/c, preferrably without crew...if an AOC is a problem, then with crew, and take the a/c while crew is on night stop, file a flight plan, answer radio transmissions, and don't attract any attention. Any deviations from flight plan, or non-compliance with ATC should immediately be explained.

If i was to allocate a budget to prevent such things from happening, I'd prefer better intelligence, to stop "hostiles" at an earlier point, rather than more fast jets.