ExXB
11th Oct 2014, 13:16
Flight attendants challenge FAA on electronic devices
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Flight attendants battled federal aviation officials in court Friday to keep airline passengers from using electronic devices during takeoffs and landings.
The Association of Flight Attendants asked a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to overturn a ruling the Federal Aviation Administration made last year easing the use of computer tablets and smartphones on planes.
The flight attendants said the FAA violated the rule-making process when it lifted restrictions that prevented passengers from using electronic devices on takeoffs and landings
The FAA changed the rules without taking in public comment, the flight attendants argued. The union also worries that electronic devices can bounce around the cabin during turbulence and injure passengers.
When an agency proposes a controversial change in a rule that affects public safety, it must be made through the proper rule-making process, the flight attendants said in a court document.
But the Court of Appeals seemed to be siding with the FAA.
Airlines have always had discretion on how to handle this, Judge Harry T. Edwards told a lawyer for the union, according to the Associated Press. A final written ruling is expected to be released later.
Under the new FAA rules, electronic devices must be kept in "airplane mode" during takeoffs and landing. Voice calls are still forbidden on U.S. airlines.
"We are confident in our position that the FAA violated the administrative procedure act in enacting a new national policy that directly conflicts with an existing regulation", said Amanda Dure, an attorney for the 60,000-member flight attendants union.
The FAA declined to comment on the case.
2014 Los Angeles Times
Now I'm confused.
Why would 60,000 odd flight attendants care? (The projectile argument doesn't stand given that my entirely legal "Steve Jobs biography" at 1.02 kgs is much more dangerous projectile than my 350g phone).
Why is 'public' comment necessary. Surely this is a technical question for the experts and not a question for John Q. Public!
Seeing as the rule has been in effect for some months, have there been any cases of injury or other problems since it came into effect?
I just don't understand the justification for this. Waste of everyone's time and money!
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Flight attendants battled federal aviation officials in court Friday to keep airline passengers from using electronic devices during takeoffs and landings.
The Association of Flight Attendants asked a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to overturn a ruling the Federal Aviation Administration made last year easing the use of computer tablets and smartphones on planes.
The flight attendants said the FAA violated the rule-making process when it lifted restrictions that prevented passengers from using electronic devices on takeoffs and landings
The FAA changed the rules without taking in public comment, the flight attendants argued. The union also worries that electronic devices can bounce around the cabin during turbulence and injure passengers.
When an agency proposes a controversial change in a rule that affects public safety, it must be made through the proper rule-making process, the flight attendants said in a court document.
But the Court of Appeals seemed to be siding with the FAA.
Airlines have always had discretion on how to handle this, Judge Harry T. Edwards told a lawyer for the union, according to the Associated Press. A final written ruling is expected to be released later.
Under the new FAA rules, electronic devices must be kept in "airplane mode" during takeoffs and landing. Voice calls are still forbidden on U.S. airlines.
"We are confident in our position that the FAA violated the administrative procedure act in enacting a new national policy that directly conflicts with an existing regulation", said Amanda Dure, an attorney for the 60,000-member flight attendants union.
The FAA declined to comment on the case.
2014 Los Angeles Times
Now I'm confused.
Why would 60,000 odd flight attendants care? (The projectile argument doesn't stand given that my entirely legal "Steve Jobs biography" at 1.02 kgs is much more dangerous projectile than my 350g phone).
Why is 'public' comment necessary. Surely this is a technical question for the experts and not a question for John Q. Public!
Seeing as the rule has been in effect for some months, have there been any cases of injury or other problems since it came into effect?
I just don't understand the justification for this. Waste of everyone's time and money!