PDA

View Full Version : 6 feared dead as Russian transport plane crashes in Siberia


Ganzic
26th Dec 2013, 12:12
6 feared dead as Russian transport plane crashes in Siberia
Not many details yet:

6 feared dead as Russian transport plane crashes in Siberia ? RT News (http://rt.com/news/plane-crash-siberia-russia-828/)

5 APUs captain
26th Dec 2013, 13:13
Latest weather: 030/2kt, V-1900m, ovc-200ft, -25*C.

Kubalson
26th Dec 2013, 15:45
9 dead

http://rt.com/news/plane-crash-siberia-russia-828/

JanetFlight
26th Dec 2013, 17:31
This one here:

RA-12162 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nilsmosberg/5170110896/)

Smoketrails
26th Dec 2013, 17:36
It wasn't 10 km out from the strip as it was not landing at Irkutsk International but Irkutsk North Western. This is where the plant is that the AN12's fly for. And the 14 end has barracks.

Big Pistons Forever
26th Dec 2013, 17:50
How many fatal accidents by Russian operators for this year are we at now ? :ugh:

CargoOne
26th Dec 2013, 18:41
BPF

From what I read in the news this is not an airline operated aircraft, nor it is military. Aircraft belongs and operated by aircraft manufacturing plant Irkut and registered on experimental aircraft register in Russia. I know it sounds weird but very likely this a work around to continue flying this dinosaur... Frankly I'm not sure who is responsible for oversight of this operation and who will lead investigation.

Basset hound
26th Dec 2013, 19:19
"The An-12 came in for landing at low altitude and grazed military depot buildings 10 kilometers away from the landing strip, after which it crashed,” a law enforcement source told the agency."

That's a bit short.

N4565L
26th Dec 2013, 19:52
Maybe as many as nine dead.

Here is a photo of the aircraft in happier times:

WorldAirPics.com : RA-12162 (http://www.worldairpics.com/results.php?ft=yes&q=RA-12162)

5 APUs captain
26th Dec 2013, 20:03
1. Airplane was more than 50 y.o.
2. Looks like Non-Precision NDB approach; crashed before inner marker.

Weather 260/2kt, V 4700m, bkn 300 ft, -26*C, RW14.

Hotel Tango
26th Dec 2013, 21:11
1. Airplane was more than 50 y.o.

So what???

Kubalson
26th Dec 2013, 21:13
Live ATC record:

http://files.radioscanner.ru/files/download/file16393/12162.mp3

anyone know russian?

N4565L
26th Dec 2013, 22:20
Chances are a/c age will not be a factor in this incident :=

mini
26th Dec 2013, 23:39
As an aside,

Anyone know how many AN12's are still plying their trade?

(if only the Herc was as durable...)

brak
26th Dec 2013, 23:43
ATC audio sounds like a normal landing, and then immediately goes into emergency response.

vovachan
27th Dec 2013, 02:53
Here are some crash scene photos:

Ïàäåíèå ñàìîëåòà ÀÍ-12 (ÔÎÒÎÃÐÀÔÈÈ Ñ ÌÅÑÒÀ ÑÎÁÛÒÈß) (http://www.38.mchs.gov.ru/news/detail.php?news=51539)

These are poor quality nighttime pics taken from the rear, but the fuselage looks pretty much intact from that angle and sits level on the ground. Looks like a controlled flight to my untrained eye.

ulugbek-pilot
27th Dec 2013, 05:26
The weather inf. was more than fine,crew error 90%, you know those 5crew member planes:ugh:

brostovsky
27th Dec 2013, 05:38
Listened to the communication exchange between the Pilot and the controller. The controller gave him the wind info and the pressure. The Captain sounded very relaxed and precise in his replies. He confirmed to the Controller that he intercepted the glide slope and that the gear is down, and he is ready for an approach.

ulugbek-pilot
27th Dec 2013, 05:45
Yep,bit later there was ground services nervous intercommunications

ulugbek-pilot
27th Dec 2013, 05:54
Bad navigation after outer marker,too many similar crashes, just like written on the book

ulugbek-pilot
27th Dec 2013, 06:27
Though they say loc established,than what's the problem,precision appr

N4565L
27th Dec 2013, 11:14
Thev RA-16 series was not used for the Antonov 12

Finn47
27th Dec 2013, 12:09
How many fatal accidents by Russian operators for this year are we at now ?As far as I can tell, this was only the second major crash with fatalities by Russian operators in 2013, if you don´t include the two fatal crashes of Antonov 2´s which were performing crop spraying ops.

Aviation Safety Network > ASN Aviation Safety Database > Geographical regions index > ASN Aviation Safety Database results (http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?Country=RA)

Outside Russia, nothing in 2013 except the Superjet 100 gear-up landing in Reykjavik with minor injuries.

vovachan
27th Dec 2013, 17:00
Here is a somewhat clearer photo

http://img.ntv.ru/home/news/20131227/6_An7.jpg

mikkojuha
28th Dec 2013, 06:24
What pros! can say concerning the right side prop blades?

VNAV PATH
28th Dec 2013, 06:25
Nice to see green leaves and short sleeve shirts in Siberia by Xmas..

KarlADrage
28th Dec 2013, 08:25
Posts#25 and #26:

Aren't they pictures from two, possibly three DIFFERENT crash sites? (tail logo may have been painted out after the event on the second shot of a blue aircraft, I accept)

Etud_lAvia
28th Dec 2013, 09:06
Madness!

As VNAV PATH sagely observed, the two photos posted by StormyKnight don't seem to resemble Siberian winter ;)

And yes, KarlADrage has it right -- they are two different crash sites, both vastly remote from Siberia.

The upper photo appears to be of a Tu-134 that crashed near Petrozavodsk (in far northwestern Russia) in June of 2011.

The lower photo -- an actual AN-12 this time! -- would seem to be a crash in the Phillipines in April of 2010.

No doubt StormyKnight posted in good faith, unaware that the linked sources inexcusably stuck random file photos on their reports without identifying them as such!

To complete the circle, we need an online journal that illustrates the Irkutsk crash story with a photo of the Zeppelin Hindenburg burning up at Lakehurst, NJ.

Noddys car
28th Dec 2013, 09:06
that last photo is the AN12 which crashed in Philippines (CRK) a few years back

Hotel Tango
28th Dec 2013, 15:05
Indeed, UP-AN216 was w/o on take-off in Barangay Laput 22 April 2010. Take these pictures off StormyKnight. Nothing to do with this accident.

vovachan
28th Dec 2013, 15:35
The front end damage - looks a lot worse

http://img.ntv.ru/home/news/20131228/ann.jpg

Machinbird
28th Dec 2013, 16:22
Looks like Vovachan has a proper picture.
It would be interesting to learn what made this accident non-survivable by the crew & passengers. Clearly the front end was heavily involved in fire, but frequently there is some time at the beginning of an event that allows the able-bodied to escape a fire. The aircraft appears to have stopped without major disruption to the structure (upright with wings and tail still attached to the fuselage.)

Were they all disabled by impact forces? Did seats break loose. Did cargo come through the cockpit? What made this accident completely non-survivable?

vovachan
28th Dec 2013, 19:37
Apparently they ran head on into a bunch of structures on the ground (warehouses)

Kulverstukas
2nd Jan 2014, 10:50
The front end damage - looks a lot worse

What made this accident completely non-survivable?

This is from Investigation Comitee video:

VSdB_gYhRPk

Octane
2nd Jan 2014, 13:27
There is no 'front end'. It's gone, demolished....