PDA

View Full Version : Emirates A380 damages YBBN runway


Wedcue
5th Dec 2013, 22:05
Stuck on the ground here, not good news... Tailstrike?

nitpicker330
5th Dec 2013, 22:13
Doesn't matter
EK have 50 more
EK will just pay a fine
EK will just sack the drivers

Going Nowhere
5th Dec 2013, 22:29
ATIS YBBN O 052311
APCH: EXP INSTR APCH FOR TFC MANAGEMENT
+ RWY: 14 FOR ARR. RWY 19 CLSD FOR ARR.
RWY 19 FROM A3 TWY AVBL FOR DEP FOR MAX B737
OPR INFO: START APPROVAL REQUIRED.
LOW LEVEL HELICOPTER OPERATIONS
IN THE VICINITY OF THE AERODROME
+ WIND: 200/14,
MAX XW 15KTS RWY 14
CLD: CAVOK
+ TMP: 23
QNH: 1013

Closed North of A3, doubt it's a tailstrike. EK is on their way to AKL at the moment.

waren9
5th Dec 2013, 22:59
Closed North of A3, doubt it's a tailstrike. EK is on their way to AKL at the moment.

depends which way it took off i guess

IAW
5th Dec 2013, 23:10
Given the recent nightly repaving works of the main runway, perhaps a section of the new stuff has given way during the takeoff roll?

tourismman
6th Dec 2013, 00:27
RWY 19 was the active and it was on takeoff so IAW could be correct .

Lancair70
6th Dec 2013, 00:55
QANTAS get blamed.


Runway debris delays flights at Brisbane Airport | News.com.au (http://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/runway-debris-delays-flights-at-brisbane-airport/story-fnii5v6w-1226776906166)


FLIGHTS arriving at Brisbane Airport this morning were delayed or diverted while maintenance staff cleared debris from the airport's main runway.
Airport spokeswoman Leonie Vandeven said operations have recommenced at a "displaced threshold" after a departing Qantas A380 blew debris, including dirt and grass, onto the runway during a takeoff earlier this morning.
"The runway was closed temporarily while staff worked to clear the debris because of obvious safety concerns," she said.
"We are currently operating with a shorten runway and are getting back on track. Arrivals were the most affected."

DirectAnywhere
6th Dec 2013, 01:25
Not to mention the opposition leader being involved in the process. News.com sucks.

We are currently operating with a shorten runway

Capn Rex Havoc
6th Dec 2013, 04:04
WEDCUE- best you change the title of the thread to Qantas A380 damages YBBN runway

DirectAnywhere
6th Dec 2013, 04:37
It's news.com.au. It could have been a virgin 737 and it would have been reported as a QF380-400 Jumbo jet. They really have no idea.

Wizofoz
6th Dec 2013, 04:48
Well, it would have had a QF flight number....

Lancair70
6th Dec 2013, 05:45
Watching the play back on FR24, all the fun of diverts etc. starts after Emirates A380 departed for Auckland.

Capt Kremin
6th Dec 2013, 06:29
It was Ek.

Ken Borough
6th Dec 2013, 07:49
An EK A380 eh? Here's me thinking it must've been that Concorde operated by Ansett-ANA! :}

C441
6th Dec 2013, 07:49
Turned up at the airport for a 9:00am flight to Melbourne. Departed at 4:30pm on the scheduled 11:00am flight.....delays and disruptions were ever-so-slightly more extensive than BAC and the media were reporting. :sad:

Oh the joy of staff travel! :cool:

Capn Rex Havoc
6th Dec 2013, 07:51
So.... an Emirates A380 took off from a runway that it is approved to operate from.

Wow that is big news.

neville_nobody
10th Dec 2013, 00:38
So.... an Emirates A380 took off from a runway that it is approved to operate from.

Wow that is big news.

Except that it damaged the concrete somehow or another and caused a few diversions and resulted in the unavailability of a instrument approach.

They are lucky it was VMC so they just moved the threshold up and continued with visual approaches. If it was IMC it would have shut down all arrivals for hours.

Funny that Leonie Vandeven made no mention of the pavement failure which was the reason given to us at the time it happened:hmm:

framer
10th Dec 2013, 01:26
What does a pavement failure actually look like? How are they detected . Naked eye? What is actually giving way . The top layer of concrete or sand /metal/ dirt at a deeper level?

falconx
10th Dec 2013, 01:48
When there's pot holes

neville_nobody
10th Dec 2013, 02:07
Usually someone spots it visually then reports it and they get engineer out there to do some sort of official inspection. I would imagine this is part of the role of safety cars.

You also see minor ones spotted during inspections and they circle them with the yellow paint. Often seen small holes in the pavement circled as you taxi around.

Sydney airport used to have problems with pavement failure in prolonged periods of rain on A1. I would assume they redid the drainage and that seems to fix the problem.

DirectAnywhere
10th Dec 2013, 02:49
If there's a pavement failure behind a 380 it tends to give way in fairly spectacular fashion.

There was one in Sydney a few months ago that the aircraft at the holding point described as, "it looks like the tarmac just exploded".

Username here
10th Dec 2013, 03:01
Photos: McDonnell Douglas MD-11(F) Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net (http://www.airliners.net/photo/FedEx---Federal/McDonnell-Douglas-MD-11(F)/1801406/L/)

Something like this?

Mister Warning
10th Dec 2013, 04:39
So that's what the yellow lines are for.... :D

601
10th Dec 2013, 05:00
So that's what the yellow lines are for....

and the cameras.....

C441
10th Dec 2013, 05:28
They are lucky it was VMC so they just moved the threshold up and continued with visual approaches. If it was IMC it would have shut down all arrivals for hours.

Initially they continued with (jet*) departures only on 19 from A4, then when the wind became less of an issue they moved arrivals and departures to 01.

*not sure what they were doing with smaller aircraft.


Strangely, the backdrop to the MD11 photo looks remarkably like looking east across the 19 threshold at Brisbane - other than the 13L sign.

1Charlie
10th Dec 2013, 08:20
The jet blast tore up about 15sq metres of the asphalt shoulder on the eastern runway edge.

Capt Fathom
10th Dec 2013, 10:33
More glue next time!:uhoh:

1Charlie
10th Dec 2013, 22:36
And now CASA mandates a full runway inspection after every A380 arrival or departure. So a 5 minute gap in arrivals has to be forced into the sequence. Two slots lost during one of the busiest times of day.

VH-Cheer Up
10th Dec 2013, 23:56
So there goes the whole "put bigger aircraft in to maximise passenger numbers for a finite number of slot times" argument. Imagine if they brought that in at Heathrow.

Perhaps the better idea would have been "make sure pavement contractor does job properly".

Worrals in the wilds
11th Dec 2013, 21:11
And now CASA mandates a full runway inspection after every A380 arrival or departure.
Only after departures.

DirectAnywhere
12th Dec 2013, 02:28
Oh well, that only makes it half as bad. Try pulling that kinda s*&t at a real airport and see how it goes.

C441
12th Dec 2013, 04:02
Only after departures.

Except Rwy 27 in Melbourne where..........

.....in the event Rwy 09/27 is
used for landing or take-off, a full
length inspection of Rwy 09/27 must
be conducted by the Senior Airside
Safety Officer (Car 2). This may also
include a sweep/clean of Rwy 09/27
prior to the next aircraft arrival or
departure.

I believe this is due to 27 being a 45m wide runway

esquire2012
12th Dec 2013, 04:27
YBBN is only a pretend airport? Thank heavens for that. We have all been taking things far too seriously.