PDA

View Full Version : how low will you go


Milo Minderbinder
6th Jan 2013, 01:47
looks like its the season for personailty type tests
here's another. How low will you go for sex?

OkCupid | Take The How Low Are Your Sex Standards Test (http://www.okcupid.com/tests/the-how-low-are-your-sex-standards-test)

Metro man
6th Jan 2013, 01:54
Mine are extremely high, I have never taken an ugly woman to bed in my life. I have woken up with a few though.:E

11Fan
6th Jan 2013, 02:11
Metro

If you still have both arms they were not that ugly.

Worrals in the wilds
6th Jan 2013, 02:58
Average, apparently. It's a bit hard to guess though because they've only got a female version.
Talk about heteronormative...:rolleyes::}

Temp Spike
6th Jan 2013, 03:08
I found the test racist since the only woman of color was on the less attractive side of the test.

PLovett
6th Jan 2013, 03:18
Just as I suspected........................................


I have absolutely no standards at all and pround of the fact. :}:ok:

Seldomfitforpurpose
6th Jan 2013, 05:34
Apart from a couple too young looking ones the rest would go on the tick list :ok:

Pontius
6th Jan 2013, 06:17
Well, apparently, I'm 'up for anything' but not 'up for everything'. Best my RN mates don't find out or else I'll be castigated for being too picky :)

probes
6th Jan 2013, 06:56
yep, Worrals, the hard part was imagining I'm a man - but with some insight into the pruner-mind... :E
well, the virtual male me "scored 18% on tolerance, higher than 90% of your peers", and "demonstrated almost no scruples when choosing women, and you are willing to sleep with many of the women that most ignore".
It does show I had reincarnated quite well, right? Up for anything? :E

Worrals in the wilds
6th Jan 2013, 07:14
Maybe you should jump the fence...:}

probes
6th Jan 2013, 07:25
based on the score of tolerance? :}:\:eek:

hellsbrink
6th Jan 2013, 08:01
So that test has confirmed what I already knew.


I'm a slut who'll jump anything that has Bulgarian Airbags.......

Lon More
6th Jan 2013, 08:15
Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the right shows. You are the #1, most slutty, test taker.

Congratulations.

So long as it's breathing and of legal age, you can always turn the lights out :E

Wonder what Slash scored?

Mallan
6th Jan 2013, 09:43
Anything on four and most on two and a pulse is not compulsory.

Well anyone who can walk under a rattle snake's belly in a wagon wheel rut with a top hat on without stooping .......

Tankertrashnav
6th Jan 2013, 09:49
Same as SFFP - definitely a couple of jailbait in there, but not, strangely, the one described as 'barely legal' who looked very legal to me! All fine as far as I'm concerned, but that body-building lady might be a bit scary :eek:

alemaobaiano
6th Jan 2013, 10:01
You are up for anything. You demonstrate almost no scruples when choosing women, and you are willing to sleep with many of the women that most ignore.

And that was without the benefit of beer goggles :O

TTFN

Capot
6th Jan 2013, 10:03
Easy to Please
You are easy to please. You are less selective than average when choosing females,

Spot on, and the older I get, the less selective I get.

DOM

birrddog
6th Jan 2013, 10:48
You are way more forgiving of physical flaws than others. Also, you are very likely to dig sloppy, crazy, nasty women.

Explains a lot.

Don't know what the problem is; they were all shaggable except the fat birds and the body builder. Even the brown bagger.

Ho hum

probes
6th Jan 2013, 11:02
Don't know what the problem is; they were all shaggable except the fat birds
the problem is, you don't know that fat is fabulous (http://www.fullbeautyproject.com/).

Lon More
6th Jan 2013, 11:15
No problems with colour btw. All pussies look black in the dark to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin.

Ozzy
6th Jan 2013, 16:33
Deaf, mute and legless. Seems like a great combo

Ozzy

Ancient Mariner
6th Jan 2013, 19:30
You are impossible to please. You are the most selective of all female seekers, showing not even a marginal interest in marginal women. Of the 21 women I showed you, 2 or fewer were satisfactory, meaning you have extremely tight standards. It is likely that in your everyday life you're not much of a gawker or whistler, and -- I'm going out on a limb here -- you don't sleep with hookers.

Actually, I am not interested in females younger than my daughters.
Per

OFSO
6th Jan 2013, 19:39
you don't sleep with hookers

Even if they play for the London Irish ?

Milo Minderbinder
6th Jan 2013, 20:02
Ironic that this thread is currently sporting a header advert for a dating site for "Single Christians"..... don't think they'll find many takers

ShyTorque
6th Jan 2013, 22:30
How low will you go for sex?

I once went out with a midget.

Milo Minderbinder
6th Jan 2013, 22:38
"the problem is, you don't know that fat is fabulous. "

Are those what you call full-fractal photographs?

Temp Spike
6th Jan 2013, 22:45
Somebody thought so Probes...

Venus of Willendorf...

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Willendorf-Venus-1468.jpg/377px-Willendorf-Venus-1468.jpg (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f7/Willendorf-Venus-1468.jpg)

lomapaseo
7th Jan 2013, 01:59
I found it best to imagine the pictures as fellow prooners moonlighting

and no I won't tell you what names I assigned to them

West Coast
7th Jan 2013, 02:12
In the words of a couple of single friends...

You can drink em skinny

Beauty is in the flick of a light switch

She's a stateside 2 but a desert 8

I'll do fat and ugly, just not at the same time

If she's lower than you standards, lower your standards

Spankbank material

These are but a few of the gems I can remember, no wonder they're single.

Worrals in the wilds
7th Jan 2013, 02:37
Do they hang out in the NAAFI Bar a lot? ;)

Fliegenmong
7th Jan 2013, 03:37
NAAFI Bar?......I don't get out much.,...

Alloa Akbar
7th Jan 2013, 08:07
I did answer very honestly..

You are the #1, most slutty, test taker.

:O

Worrals in the wilds
7th Jan 2013, 08:34
What did you do, say yes to all and then email the site asking for their contact details? ;)

parabellum
7th Jan 2013, 09:27
Apparently I am, "Very Easy to Please" as I only knocked back six out of twenty one, I'd call that "Picky"!

OFSO
7th Jan 2013, 09:50
I am even easier to please. Either that or I need new test...sorry, spectacles.

Alloa Akbar
7th Jan 2013, 09:52
Worrals - I think that them calling me slutty is a tad harsh, I think it is just a reflection on the fact that I am not a shallow man.. Although I did say No to the 2 fat chicks! :ok:

B Fraser
7th Jan 2013, 09:56
I wonder what the results would be if there was a test for women. Their version would need to include job and salary details of the candidates to get an accurate result.

:rolleyes:

Alloa Akbar
7th Jan 2013, 10:00
One category too many there mate.. ;)

MagnusP
7th Jan 2013, 10:04
The lowest I can go is the D-flat below the bottom E string. F# is the highest.

603DX
7th Jan 2013, 10:32
To the very lower depths of civilised, decent attitudes, it seems to me. I am probably in a minority of one here, but the format of this so-called "personality test" reduces the intimate and complex act of human relations necessary for procreation, to a lowest common denominator of imagined rutting like animals on sight.

It reduces the females depicted to the equivalent status of meat, to be slobbered over. Yuk!! Evidently, the veneer of civilised, decent behaviour and attitudes towards women is very, very thin indeed, in some circles. :(

Fliegenmong
7th Jan 2013, 11:09
"It reduces the females depicted to the equivalent status of meat, to be slobbered over. Yuk!! "

You've never visited my home town then 603 :p:}:{

lomapaseo
7th Jan 2013, 13:13
It reduces the females depicted to the equivalent status of meat, to be slobbered over. Yuk!! Evidently, the veneer of civilised, decent behaviour and attitudes towards women is very, very thin indeed, in some circles


so .... what's wrong with that?

that's what outside the family life is all about for men

MagnusP
7th Jan 2013, 14:11
rutting like animals

603DX, you just brought me over all nostalgic. :ok:

603DX
7th Jan 2013, 14:29
The attitude displayed here is very clear. However, the implication that all men share that mindset is very much mistaken. A fair proportion of adult males have advanced rather further than that, from our distant brutal Neanderthal instincts. Some of us even like women (i.e. enjoy their company, respect their opinions, and appreciate their different emotional constitution), without mindlessly wanting to "get into their pants" all the time. This is evidently terra incognita to those who hold the viewpoint that you so bluntly express, alas ...

(This is in response to lomapaseo's post, not that of Magnus, since I assume that the latter was just injecting a little humour into the subject, whereas I fear that lomapaseo is deadly serious.)

probes
7th Jan 2013, 14:34
603DX, you don't mean they actually think like that? :eek:
Mr.D had a word of wisdom about it once.

MagnusP
7th Jan 2013, 14:45
You're right, 603DX, I was indulging my usual puerile sense of humour.

There's a serious point here, though. I have a number of female friends, and I mean very good, close, platonic, trusting friendships, but I have to admit that with the vast majority I have found myself sometimes pondering what "it" would be like, not that it's something I'd ever be likely to initiate. I don't know whether the distaff take the same approach to male friends. Is that low, or wrong? I honestly don't know.

lomapaseo
7th Jan 2013, 14:49
603DX

(This is in response to lomapaseo's post, not that of Magnus, since I assume that the latter was just injecting a little humour into the subject, whereas I fear that lomapaseo is deadly serious.)

how dare you to come into a fun thread and spoil it. :eek:

603DX
7th Jan 2013, 15:00
how dare you to come into a fun thread and spoil it. http://images.ibsrv.net/ibsrv/res/src:www.pprune.org/get/images/smilies/eek.gif

I couldn't possibly spoil such a tasteful, sensitively expressed thread, laced so charmingly with so much witty irony, just by making a few observations on perceived attitudes to the subject matter, surely? :rolleyes:

Alloa Akbar
7th Jan 2013, 16:25
with the vast majority I have found myself sometimes pondering what "it" would be like

Come on Magnus, be honest.. for "Vast majority" read "the lot of them" :p

Women fall into two basic categories "I would" and "I wouldn't.. even with yours mate". From those two basic categories, we then classify further subsets dependent on personal qualities and attributes..

I would - big t1ts, great smile, wit, big t1ts, charm, intelligence, big t1ts, good social circle of female friends (Hefty proportion of "I would" candidates) open mind, big t1ts, sense of humour.. etc etc.

I wouldn't - No friends, personal freshness issues, dumb as a rock, yellow hair, curly teeth, crystal meth dependency, no t1ts.

Simples!! :O

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 16:28
Alloa wrote:

I would - big t1ts, great smile, wit, big t1ts, charm, intelligence, big t1ts, good social circle of female friends (Hefty proportion of "I would" candidates) open mind, big t1ts, sense of humour.. etc etc.

Are you Slasher's long-lost twin? Or, at least related?


:}:}:}:}:}

Tableview
7th Jan 2013, 16:32
Having looked at them, there were perhaps 3 or 4 to whom my initial reaction was 'I wouldn't.' A couple simply because they looked like hard faced bitches and because there is more to 'shagging' than the physical act. I prefer to have something to say before and afterwards, to which end I find that a brain is possibly even more important sexually than a fine pair of mammaries and a nice arse.

I don't see this type of test as 'demeaning', just pointless. In fact I wonder why I bothered ..... probably in the hope of seeing a fine pair of mammaries and a nice arse, which proves that men only really think of one thing!

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 16:37
Tableview wrote:

I prefer to have something to say before and afterwards, to which end I find that a brain is possibly even more important sexually than a fine pair of mammaries and a nice arse.

I whole-heartedly agree. I too want something to say before - "let's do it" and afterwards - "that was pretty good". Brain is optional.

vulcanised
7th Jan 2013, 16:44
I will cheerfully admit to visiting porn sites, but less often than I used to because I find more and more that what is on offer has no appeal for me.

In fact, a fair proportion of the activity is just plain revolting.

Alloa Akbar
7th Jan 2013, 16:49
So how long do we wait before one of the feminists gate crash our little thread of testosterone and t1ts?? :E

http://www.demotivationalposters.org/image/demotivational-poster/small/1210/attitude-woman-redhead-slutty-sexy-demotivational-posters-1350157149.jpg

Ancient Observer
7th Jan 2013, 16:56
603 - I'm not sure you should call Loma "Shirley". One or other might become upset.

As for rutting, and all that, er, I think my rutting days are now behind me, although if that Emilia Fox were to ask me nicely, perhaps I could be persuaded. I used to think that about Gwyneth, but then I heard her speak naturally. She would have to agree not to talk in the morning while she made the breakfast.
However, when I was a student discovering sex, (nobody knew about sex before my generation, of course) both the blokes and the girls seemed quite keen on rutting. Indeed, once or twice I obtained a bedwarmer of the fairer sex as I had a reputation as a rutter. (and a rotter).

Now, still being in a long and loving relationship, of course I appreciate all that other stuff that 603 spoke about.

But that Emilia......

hellsbrink
7th Jan 2013, 16:56
It reduces the females depicted to the equivalent status of meat, to be slobbered over. Yuk!! Evidently, the veneer of civilised, decent behaviour and attitudes towards women is very, very thin indeed, in some circles.

And if you look through the list of "tests"

OkCupid | Browse Tests (http://www.okcupid.com/tests)

you see they do the same sort of "test" for the fairer sex vis vis "What kind of Man turns you on".

So what does that mean, 603, could it be that females can be equally as "primal" as males, that men are nothing but walking sex toys that are to be used and abused at every opportunity? Or could it be a peculiar thing that some people have called childish fun, where nobody gets harmed?

After all, it's no different to what men and women do in real life. The difference is that nobody overhears any bad comments when people do the "test" online......

B Fraser
7th Jan 2013, 17:07
Some of us even like women (i.e. enjoy their company, respect their opinions, and appreciate their different emotional constitution), without mindlessly wanting to "get into their pants" all the time.

603DX. Would those be the type of chaps who appreciate musical theatre and interior design ?

Company..........................tick as long as shopping is not involved.
Opinions...........................tick up to a point.
Emotional constitution.........sorry, not a hope.

as for the rest...................guilty as charged. :E

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 17:09
Alloa:

I think the lady in the photo your provided has a very nice atTITude!!

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 17:12
hellsbrink wrote:

that men are nothing but walking sex toys that are to be used and abused at every opportunity?

I'll volunteer. :ok:

hellsbrink
7th Jan 2013, 17:15
I'll send some of the local "boys" round to you then, rgb......:E

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 17:21
No thanks, hellsbrink. You can, however, send some of those local Maedchen around if you want!!!

hellsbrink
7th Jan 2013, 17:27
Nope, I'm keeping them for myself

rgbrock1
7th Jan 2013, 17:30
Greedy and selfish!!!

hellsbrink
7th Jan 2013, 17:31
Flattery will get you nowhere :p

Milo Minderbinder
7th Jan 2013, 19:21
"All pussies look black in the dark to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin."

I thought that came from Chairman Miaow???

CityofFlight
8th Jan 2013, 02:30
Welcome back, Slasher.

Be prepared for the the onslaught of fans. Of course, that wouldn't be me. :p








Just kidding. :ok:

Slasher
8th Jan 2013, 02:31
You are hard to please. You are highly selective of females, showing not even
a marginal interest in marginal women. Of the 21 women I showed you, 7 to
9 were satisfactory, meaning you have standards that are tighter than
average. It is likely that in your everyday life you're not much of a gawker or
whistler, and -- I'm going out on a limb here -- you don't sleep with hookers.

I don't sleep with 'em - I shag 'em senseless and boot them out when I'm
done!

You are more likely to choose a woman by her face than her body.

Bullsh!t - body plays a large part. God invented brown paper bags
for any visage issues.


Test results are categorized into 8 levels of pickiness, as the graph to the
right
shows. You are the #3, third most critical, test taker.

There are many other factors like chin size and shape, nail polish, eye shadow,
hand size and condition (I'm bloody picky about brickie labourer-looking hands
grabbing my plonker), lip size and shape, boob shape, and whether she was
the backstabbing b!tch who reported me and got me booted the past 3 months
without checking with Stuart first.

As an experiment, you might try the test late at night, under the influence of
alcohol.

I would shag anything if pissed as a newt, except Stuart's GF - I'd pass out
from alcohol poisoning before ever being able to consume enough piss to
fancy that nasty piece of work.

david1300
8th Jan 2013, 02:45
Welcome back Slasher:ok:. I fear your reputation has grown while you were away, and if you try and live up/down* to it you will be sent away for another 3 months:{

* delete as required

rgbrock1
8th Jan 2013, 15:15
Ah, Slasher, nice to see you back on the hallowed threads.
Might want to tone it down a notch though.

Because next time instead of this:

http://360jobinterview.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/time_out_chair_2.jpg

You might get this:

http://www.sfmoma.org/images/artwork/large/2001.390.jpg

And we wouldn't want to see you trying out ol' sparky!

Instead, we want you to make continued commentaries on:

http://www.bollyclips.com/photogallery/albums/Bikinis%20New/normal_Hot_bikini_babes_4.jpg

OFSO
8th Jan 2013, 18:40
Why is this thread entitled "How low will you go" ?

Surely showing generosity to the old, fat and ugly is a display of charity ? I only wish some of the beautiful teenage girls here in Spain would bear this in mind when they pass me on the street - and were they to persue this philosophy further in an intimate and kindly manner, I certainly would not despise them for so doing. Far from it !

cockney steve
8th Jan 2013, 21:38
I didn't do, or look at the test. It's obviously one of those "Tongue -in-cheek" fun "questionnaires"

The posts are hilarious and really cheered me up....as some will know ,I lost my ladylove of 3 1/2 years ,on 4 September.

Prior to her, I'd been alone (and celibate! ) for over 10 years. She would have laughed her socks off as well, like me. she'd not had a partner for around 9 years and never "put it about"...didn't mean she was prudish or disapproved though.
603, lighten -up!just because we can laugh and joke ,doesn't mean we are demeaning and objectifying women......poor precious flowers need to grow up a bit.

A friend's Mother -in law said she'd met jimmy Savile and he'd not molested her or "tried it on"....he asked her if she felt insulted or inadequate.

SLASHER! WELCOME BACK! THE VOICE OF FREE MIND AND SPIRIT RETURNS!:ok::ok::ok: