PDA

View Full Version : FlightGlobal slipping . . .


robbreid
5th Sep 2012, 13:02
Don't you hate when you watch a movie, and they show a B747 takeoff, then in flight their on a Airbus, then they land and it's a DC-10.

The only thing worse is Flight Global posting a photo of a Citation Mustang and relating the story to the Citation Ten.

Don't you have to know about airplanes to work there - that's not a mistake, that is someone who knows the word Cessna - and all the people at FlightGlobal - don't they read there own website??

http://i845.photobucket.com/albums/ab20/bizjets101/FlightGlobal.jpg

I thought I'd test the powers of pprune to see how long it takes to post a Citation Ten Photo. Here's a photo of one if they need it; (or at least a Citation X; AVCANADA • View topic - Cessna Citation Ten - The Fastest Civil Aircraft . . . (http://www.avcanada.ca/forums2/viewtopic.php?f=105&t=83582)

Gulfstreamaviator
5th Sep 2012, 13:06
Many many job adverts, inaccurate transcription data.

Bad proofing and sub editing.

But then whats new, no real professions on board.

glf

fleigle
5th Sep 2012, 14:09
Hey Robbreid,
Should it not be "their"..... just asking.:(
In general I think that Flightglobal is not reporting as well as they were, or maybe I just don't like their new website format.
f

robbreid
5th Sep 2012, 14:42
There, their, they're, got me on that one. Websites like AvCanada allow you to amend your post prior to another post being added without a notice showing you've amended the post.

Pprune shows you've changed/amended your post - I actually saw the 'their' just as I clicked - but rather than have it show the post was amended, I just left it.

Also the link to the photo - is a shot of the Ten prototype - I meant FlightGlobal at the least could use a Citation X!!!

Cheers Rob CYKZ