advo-cate
14th Apr 2012, 03:00
Have been reading again - Always interesting what you find. An update from casa on this one would be interesting in light of the recent FWA hearing and the Union!!
Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Budget Estimates May 2006
Transport and Regional Services
Question: CASA 04
Division/Agency: Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Topic: CASA Restructure – Use of AWA’s
Hansard Page: 26 (23/05/06)
Senator O'Brien asked:
Senator O’BRIEN—So what do you say about section 400(5) of the Work Choices Act, which says: A person must not apply duress to an employer or employee in connection with an AWA.
Mr Harbor—With regard to that, we are seeking advice. I need to take that on
notice.
Answer:
CASA does not believe that its actions or policies have subjected its employees to duress in relation to AWAs. CASA will continue to treat its employees and
prospective employees fairly and in accordance with the Work Choices Act 2006.casa - Standing By for an update.
Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Legislation Committee
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Budget Estimates May 2006
Transport and Regional Services
Question: CASA 04
Division/Agency: Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Topic: CASA Restructure – Use of AWA’s
Hansard Page: 26 (23/05/06)
Senator O'Brien asked:
Senator O’BRIEN—So what do you say about section 400(5) of the Work Choices Act, which says: A person must not apply duress to an employer or employee in connection with an AWA.
Mr Harbor—With regard to that, we are seeking advice. I need to take that on
notice.
Answer:
CASA does not believe that its actions or policies have subjected its employees to duress in relation to AWAs. CASA will continue to treat its employees and
prospective employees fairly and in accordance with the Work Choices Act 2006.casa - Standing By for an update.