PDA

View Full Version : New FAA rules for pilot duty.


weasil
21st Dec 2011, 17:04
FAA Issues Pilot Fatigue Final Rule (http://www.faa.gov/news/updates/?newsId=66449)

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Acting Administrator Michael Huerta today announced a sweeping final rule that overhauls commercial passenger airline pilot scheduling to ensure pilots have a longer opportunity for rest before they enter the cockpit.

“This is a major safety achievement,” said Secretary LaHood. “We made a promise to the traveling public that we would do everything possible to make sure pilots are rested when they get in the cockpit. This new rule raises the safety bar to prevent fatigue.”

“Every pilot has a personal responsibility to arrive at work fit for duty. This new rule gives pilots enough time to get the rest they really need to safely get passengers to their destinations,” said FAA Acting Administrator Huerta.

The Department of Transportation identified the issue of pilot fatigue as a top priority during a 2009 airline Safety Call to Action following the crash of Colgan Air flight 3407. The FAA launched an aggressive effort to take advantage of the latest research on fatigue to create a new pilot flight, duty and rest proposal, which the agency issued on September 10, 2010.

Key components of this final rule for commercial passenger flights include:

Varying flight and duty requirements based on what time the pilot’s day begins. The new rule incorporates the latest fatigue science to set different requirements for pilot flight time, duty period and rest based on the time of day pilots begin their first flight, the number of scheduled flight segments and the number of time zones they cross. The previous rules included different rest requirements for domestic, international and unscheduled flights. Those differences were not necessarily consistent across different types of passenger flights, and did not take into account factors such as start time and time zone crossings.

Flight duty period. The allowable length of a flight duty period depends on when the pilot’s day begins and the number of flight segments he or she is expected to fly, and ranges from 9-14 hours for single crew operations. The flight duty period begins when a flightcrew member is required to report for duty, with the intention of conducting a flight and ends when the aircraft is parked after the last flight. It includes the period of time before a flight or between flights that a pilot is working without an intervening rest period. Flight duty includes deadhead transportation, training in an aircraft or flight simulator, and airport standby or reserve duty if these tasks occur before a flight or between flights without an intervening required rest period.

Flight time limits of eight or nine hours. The FAA limits flight time – when the plane is moving under its own power before, during or after flight – to eight or nine hours depending on the start time of the pilot’s entire flight duty period.

10-hour minimum rest period.The rule sets a 10-hour minimum rest period prior to the flight duty period, a two-hour increase over the old rules. The new rule also mandates that a pilot must have an opportunity for eight hours of uninterrupted sleep within the 10-hour rest period.

New cumulative flight duty and flight time limits.The new rule addresses potential cumulative fatigue by placing weekly and 28-day limits on the amount of time a pilot may be assigned any type of flight duty. The rule also places 28-day and annual limits on actual flight time. It also requires that pilots have at least 30 consecutive hours free from duty on a weekly basis, a 25 percent increase over the old rules.

Fitness for duty. The FAA expects pilots and airlines to take joint responsibility when considering if a pilot is fit for duty, including fatigue resulting from pre-duty activities such as commuting. At the beginning of each flight segment, a pilot is required to affirmatively state his or her fitness for duty. If a pilot reports he or she is fatigued and unfit for duty, the airline must remove that pilot from duty immediately.

Fatigue Risk Management System. An airline may develop an alternative way of mitigating fatigue based on science and using data that must be validated by the FAA and continuously monitored.

In 2010, Congress mandated a Fatigue Risk Management Plan (FRMP) for all airlines and they have developed these plans based on FAA guidance materials. An FRMP provides education for pilots and airlines to help address the effects of fatigue which can be caused by overwork, commuting, or other activities. Airlines will be required to train pilots about the potential effects of commuting.

Required training updates every two years will include fatigue mitigation measures, sleep fundamentals and the impact to a pilot’s performance. The training will also address how fatigue is influenced by lifestyle – including nutrition, exercise, and family life – as well as by sleep disorders and the impact of commuting.

The estimated cost of this rule to the aviation industry is $297 million but the benefits are estimated between $247- $470 million. Covering cargo operators under the new rule would be too costly compared to the benefits generated in this portion of the industry. Some cargo airlines already have improved rest facilities for pilots to use while cargo is loaded and unloaded during night time operations. The FAA encourages cargo operators to opt into the new rule voluntarily, which would require them to comply with all of its provisions.

The final rule has been sent to the Federal Register for display and publication. It is currently available at:http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/recently_published/media/2120-AJ58-FinalRule.pdf, and will take effect in two years to allow commercial passenger airline operators time to transition.

A fact sheet with additional information is at Fact Sheets (http://www.faa.gov/news/fact_sheets/).

MarkerInbound
22nd Dec 2011, 00:20
Will certainly make the ATP written interesting in a couple years.

maninbah
10th Mar 2012, 21:29
https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=13373

Document as to be reviewed...

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-29/pdf/2012-4627.pdf

There are some interesting points in the proposal...

"As noted previously, currently only PICs are required to hold an ATP certificate and an aircraft type rating for the airplane flown in revenue service. Based on information provided by industry, the FAA estimates that about 85% of the SICs for regional airlines and approximately 15% of the SICs of major and cargo airlines do not have an ATP
certificate."

"As previously noted following the Congressional mandate of the Act, the
proposed rule requires all SICs in part 121 air carrier operations to have an
ATP certificate by August 2, 2013."

"From a social point of view, the reduced salary and benefits reflects the loss of pilot
productivity the 1,500-hour restriction brings about by delaying the entrance of
pilots into part 121 operations and, consequently, delaying their career path.
A common career path of a pilot in part 121 operations is to start out as an
SIC (first officer) in a regional airline, upgrade to PIC (captain) at that airline
and, subsequently, to become an SIC and a PIC at a major airline. Based on
a survey of industry, the FAA estimates the career path of a ‘‘typical’’ pilot in
part 121 operations as follows: Upgrade to regional airline PIC after five years,
move to a position as SIC at a major airline after two years as PIC at the
regional airline, and upgrade to PIC at the major airline after an additional ten
years."

"There is considerable cross-sectional variation in the hiring minimums of
regional airlines, but the average total hours minimum appears to be about 750
hours. The number of flight hours the FAA assumes pilots can accumulate in
one year is also about 750 hours. Accordingly, the FAA estimates that the
proposed requirement for an ATP certificate with 1,500 hours of flight
time would, on average, delay a new pilot’s part 121 career approximately
one year."

"Benefits of This Proposed Rule
The FAA expects that this proposed rule would reduce the number of future
accidents. The bulk of the benefits of the proposed rule, particularly with part
121 operations, would be the value of the averted fatalities and injuries. The
value of averted fatalities and injuries is based on the value of a statistical life,
which the Office of the Secretary of Transportation currently estimates to be
$6 million. "

"The proposed rule would affect small firms in part 121, part 135, and part 91,
subpart K, operations in the following North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) industries, which shows that the Small Business Administration (SBA) size standard is 1,500 employees for all four industries"

"This requirement will necessitate changes in the ATP knowledge and practical tests.
In addition to all pilots in part 121 operations, this requirement would apply to PICs in part 135 air carrier operations that require the PIC to hold an ATP certificate, and PICs in part 91,
subpart K, Fractional Ownership Operations, which require the PIC to hold an ATP certificate.
4. An aircraft type rating for all SICs serving in part 121 operations. The FOQ ARC made the same recommendation. Current part 121 requirements require only the PIC to hold an aircraft type rating. The FAA has determined that this requirement would improve safety in part 121 operations by further exposing the pilot to an advanced multiengine aircraft and a multicrew
environment. Also the training and testing for an aircraft type rating requires a pilot to be tested to the same standard as the PIC and demonstrate proficiency in difficult operational
conditions, including adverse weather and high altitude operations."

"5. A minimum of 1,000 hours in air carrier operations to serve as PIC in part 121 operations. An unintended consequence of the Act’s requirement for all part 121 pilots to hold an ATP certificate is that the natural mentoring of SICs may not occur. The 1,000-hour
requirement would ensure that a pilot would have at least one full year of relevant operational experience before upgrading to PIC. The FAA proposes to allow a pilot to count SIC time in part
121 operations as well as PIC time in part 135 operations and in part 91, subpart K, Fractional Ownership Operations, that require an ATP certificate per the operating rule part."


The amended Rule will look like this...

§ 121.436 Pilot qualification: Certificates
and experience requirements.
(a) No pilot may act as pilot in
command of an aircraft unless he holds
an airline transport pilot certificate, an
appropriate aircraft type rating for the
aircraft being flown, and has 1,000
hours as second in command in part 121
operations, pilot in command in
operations under § 91.1053(a)(2)(i) or
§ 135.243(a)(1) of this chapter, or any
combination thereof.
(b) No certificate holder may use nor
may any pilot act as second in
command unless the pilot holds an
airline transport pilot certificate and an
appropriate aircraft type rating for the
aircraft being flown. A pilot type rating
obtained under § 61.55 does not satisfy
the requirements of this section.
(c) Compliance with the requirements
of this section is required by August 1,
2013.
§ 121.437 [Removed]"

I see an interesting scenario for all those who were hired into Part 121 operations (All majors & regionals plus others)... with low time as with a deadline of August 2013 an SIC is going to have to achieve 1500hrs total time and 1000 hours in the operation in order to have an ATPL by that time frame. If a pilot flys only 600 hours a year, it may be impossible to achieve and at that point, I wonder what will happen to that pilot when the clock strikes August 2013 if he/she does not have the required hours?

Secondly, this may add to the problem of low-time SIC when the company needs upgrades... Before, an SIC only had to make 1500hours so if hired with, say 1000 hours he/she would achieve this in less than 1 year normally. But now, there will be a 1000hr requirement in the Part 121 operation.. and those hours take 18 months to accumulate... interesting.....

Ndicho Moja
27th May 2012, 09:45
These changes should be an absolute minimum, and not before time. Perhaps, not holding my breath though, with the increase in minimum requirements the pay structure may reflect the new requirements.

Having said the above, I come from a back ground where one couldn't rent a C210 unless you had at least 600hrs and a Baron unless you had 800-1000hrs. But that was a long(20+ years) time ago. Jet command didn't come until you had a few thousand on type.

Things change though.