pacrat
18th Nov 2011, 23:33
Humidity correction is not a requirement in certification to my knowledge, yet I recall training on a Brantly B-2, in a past life and the hover ceiling graph showed the marked decrease in hover ceiling at 100% humidity as compared to about 30% I recall. It is without doubt true that high humidity will have a negative impact on performance but is the effect ever calculated by manufacturers at the performance flight testing stage?
In short can you answer these questions for my;
- If performance is always referenced to an ISA datum does ISA have limits on humidity before it becomes a required factor for specific consideration?
- When a correction is applied for humidity is it acceptable to derive its effect on Density Altitude and performance by pure mathematical means?
- Mathematical correction seems problematic as while the comparison of atomic mass of water vapour is easy enough as is that of the principal gases in air which it displaces, humidity as a percentage varies with temperature also. The calculation is therefore rather complex but no doubt possible. So what is the formula?
I would appreciate any guidance on this matter or referral to those that may have tackled the topic in the past.
In short can you answer these questions for my;
- If performance is always referenced to an ISA datum does ISA have limits on humidity before it becomes a required factor for specific consideration?
- When a correction is applied for humidity is it acceptable to derive its effect on Density Altitude and performance by pure mathematical means?
- Mathematical correction seems problematic as while the comparison of atomic mass of water vapour is easy enough as is that of the principal gases in air which it displaces, humidity as a percentage varies with temperature also. The calculation is therefore rather complex but no doubt possible. So what is the formula?
I would appreciate any guidance on this matter or referral to those that may have tackled the topic in the past.