Bus429
25th Sep 2011, 14:13
Chaps & Chapesses,
Several auditing scenarios (I wear several hats).
Scenario 1:
In my capacity as Deputy Quality Manager for an AMO in the east, I often have to host customers' auditors. No probs but I'm surprised at how many audit us against the regulations rather than any contract in place. Fair enough to refer to in-house procedures as well as the contract reference for findings but many look amazed (or fazed) when I suggest we're already approved under the regulation so don't need an audit with a checklist copied from Part 145 (Form 6) or its equivalent(s).
Scenario 2:
I conduct various audits under Part M and Part 145. The former takes me to maintenance providers but often the CAMO's aircraft is not under maintenance or at the facility. Given that one is auditing to contract of which maintenance standards is part (and encompasses the AMO's procedures), I think it fair to sample any aircraft maintenance process and other MOE & procedures related to them (including facilities, tooling, records etc, etc). In fact, I've observed regulators' auditors doing the same when an aircraft under their jurisdiction is not available. During one recent audit, the auditee (politely) objected.
Any comments?
Several auditing scenarios (I wear several hats).
Scenario 1:
In my capacity as Deputy Quality Manager for an AMO in the east, I often have to host customers' auditors. No probs but I'm surprised at how many audit us against the regulations rather than any contract in place. Fair enough to refer to in-house procedures as well as the contract reference for findings but many look amazed (or fazed) when I suggest we're already approved under the regulation so don't need an audit with a checklist copied from Part 145 (Form 6) or its equivalent(s).
Scenario 2:
I conduct various audits under Part M and Part 145. The former takes me to maintenance providers but often the CAMO's aircraft is not under maintenance or at the facility. Given that one is auditing to contract of which maintenance standards is part (and encompasses the AMO's procedures), I think it fair to sample any aircraft maintenance process and other MOE & procedures related to them (including facilities, tooling, records etc, etc). In fact, I've observed regulators' auditors doing the same when an aircraft under their jurisdiction is not available. During one recent audit, the auditee (politely) objected.
Any comments?