CelticRambler
8th Sep 2011, 16:00
Two of the arguments for replacing an aging fleet with shiny new aircraft are an improvement in fuel efficiency and improved cabin comfort, especially lower noise. But if you were to take a generally healthy airframe, how close to that same level of improvement could you get by retrofitting modern products and technology that wasn't available when the aircraft came off the production line?
Take a 1990s turboprop - could 21st century passive insulation achieve the same "quiet" as an ATR600? What about using slimline, "10kg less" seats to save a ton and a half on a 150-seater jet? Or fitting modern, efficient engines via a suitably designed adaptor?
Take a 1990s turboprop - could 21st century passive insulation achieve the same "quiet" as an ATR600? What about using slimline, "10kg less" seats to save a ton and a half on a 150-seater jet? Or fitting modern, efficient engines via a suitably designed adaptor?