PDA

View Full Version : Minimum per annum Flight hours


helmet fire
26th May 2011, 18:23
Hi all,

I am wondering if there is in any published literature discussing or concluding on a minimum acceptable level of flying hours per annum for a professional civilian helicopter pilot before the onset of skill atrophy? I am particulalry intrested in any indications or investigation into sustained low rates.

I am trying to consider beyond subjective assessment any risks posed by sustained low flight hours in a IFR HEMS setting in terms of published data. If possible.

I know we will all have our opinion on this but I would love to find anything definitive. I have often heard 180 hours p.a. in my military time, but I never got a hold of anything beyond people "saying" that was the minimum - i.e. there was no published rule, or study to back up the rumour.

Now I know there is no way this topic will gain concensus here on the 'prune (why else do we read it??) and I suspect we all have a different opinion on this, so please: people with published results at hand shout louder! Others, lets hear your opinions and reasons. I am not talking simply minimum mandated currency periods, but maintenance of recency and skill sets.

HEMS and SAR operation (we call them the same thing down here in Oz). IFR, NVG, winch ops.

Lets hear it, thanks, hf
:8

Gordy
26th May 2011, 19:20
While this does not discuss the reasons for requirements, however it does list the minimum requirement of "100 hours within the previous 12 months" as a requirement for interagency carding for fire operations in the U.S.

A type II CWN contract can be downloaded here:

Type II Contract (http://www.fs.fed.us/fire/contracting/helicopters_cwn/helicopter_contract_cwn.pdf)

Even though this is a Type II contract, the pilot requirements are the same for all contracts. (I was unable to find any other contracts on-line). Go to page 30 in the document, (will be 51 of 135 in pdf format), to Section D—Pilot Requirements Experience and it shows the requirements in detail. This is a basic summary, read the document for ALL the correct info. All times are helicopter:

Total Time:...................1,500
PIC..............................1,500
Preceding 12 months.........100
Weight class....................100
Make & Model....................50
Turbine...........................100
Mountain.........................200
Mountain Make & model.......10
Long line VR......................10

helmet fire
28th May 2011, 18:19
Thanks for that Gordy,
I am sure there must be some work in this area, but there just seems to be so little.

I would suggest the min hours could some how be mitigated with a vigorous training program, but I would put the min at about 120 for IFR EMS and perhaps 80 when coupled with a 180 day sim program. But I wonder how long you could sustain that?

Thoughts/research anyone?

topendtorque
28th May 2011, 21:49
I don't have any reseach data, but from the coal face we often flew those who had minimum hours, those looking for a job, and if they had not flown for an extended period say six to eighteen months, then the first hour they flew was often quite good to immaculate but their standard deteriorated drammatically after that most often to a point of being seriously dangerous.

Of course from there they went into a dual training type program where they oftem flew as many as 150 hours dual before being allowed solo to do specific tasks.

We had three benchmarks from that intro, they first graduated to 'ferry standard', where they could be trusted to navigate and fly above 500 feet with a reasonable chance of landing if something went wrong, then they went ont what we called 'survey standard'.

This meant excellent skills in confined areas and much better at autos including an introduction to Low level autos.

That would be around three to six huindred hours. ( no one can do this nowadays as nearly all boss geos requires a min of 1,000 hours for their contracted pilots)

If they survived their first couple of hundred hour jobs at that. or mpre to the point our nerves survived it, then they would be inducted into the 'mustering standard' and taught specifically how they could be bitten with being caught turning downwind and of course heaps of commercial types tricks.

Usually they had gained around 1,000 hours under supervision, I.E. often flying solo in dual musters rather than as dual in the closest sense before we would be game to let them out on a solo muster, where they could meet and beat most challenges, come home without wrecking rod ends on the aircraft and keep the clients happpy.

Ther most dangerous level in their career was from 800 to 1200 hour mark as that is where they had learnt to manipulate the machione easily and often did so without regard to the cattle or their maintenance bills.

There were two types of check flights in that area,

1. Was for the cautious types (about 92% of the individuals) who wanted to learn more about their maneuvres and machines and where it might really bight them, and
2. was for the 8% just way too flamboyant types who really 'got it' and came back from that taken down a peg or three.

From there they usually accumulated up to about five thousand hours before we could consider them crash proof and excellent aricraft operators.

Those guys are now flying all around the world and doing well, I can say with some pride as to having been involved along with the chief pilot, managing director and especially the senior workshop staff in directing them along the way.

However we have often come across individuals with anything up to 2,000 hours or more who have not flown for say six mionths and do way too dangerous things, like move outside their comfort zone and crash an aircraft by overpitching at low level maneuvering.

From my point of view the simple BFR requirement is ridulous, regardless of their experience up to say 2500 hours they should be required to do a few hours dual before being signed off and much less above that hour mark as by then they have learnt usually to temper themselves and stay indie teh comfort zone.

I think it might be up to the operator to work out what comfort zone he requires as to do a simple five or six hours ofd check rides with a couple of IFR approaches mighht be tempting fate way too much.

helmet fire
7th Jun 2011, 03:04
Thanks TET.

I guess low flying hours must be replaced by higher training requirements - not just basic currency.