PDA

View Full Version : Crash Landing after take-off at Bournemouth


FlyTig
18th May 2011, 16:54
American registered executive twin lands on golf course BBC News - Men's 'lucky escape' from Dorset light aircraft crash (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-13443759)

jxc
18th May 2011, 18:53
Ah The ole Pancaking technique :D

Well done to them hope they are ok

Spunky Monkey
18th May 2011, 19:19
I seem to remember the phrase from an old US WWII movie, where the pilot (someone famous) was going to pancake the aircraft. Finished with the Immortal words - "Pancake, Pancake, Pancake..."
I wonder who will pick up the Green Fees?

transilvana
18th May 2011, 20:19
"clear to the right, no golf players around", "nice landing sir", I won´t take the ugly one.

Beautiful landing, I remember one similar in Malaga years ago with a B200, wheels up landing and plane was flying again 3 days later. Independly of aircraft problems it looks a very good landing, congratulations, you know a good landing is the one you can leave the aircraft walking.

Sir George Cayley
18th May 2011, 20:43
CEGA ex Bournemouth. Have a look at today's NOTAMs

SGC

Dawdler
18th May 2011, 22:07
There is a very similar thread here:
http://www.pprune.org/private-flying/451969-aircraft-down-bournemouth.html

Newforest2
19th May 2011, 06:31
Best use for golf courses!;)

HS-125
19th May 2011, 14:21
Rumor has it the aircraft had a burst tyre ...

He had a hole in one.

supertech
19th May 2011, 17:49
I wonder who does/ did the maintenance on this E90???:ooh:

421
19th May 2011, 21:46
I doubt the maintenace is an issue. If you look at the other thread there was a NOTAM put out that stated get fuel from Shell only. All Jet A1 aircraft were grounded. That suggests a fuel contamination problem more than anything.

eyeinthesky
21st May 2011, 06:48
Forced landing shortly after departure at about the place a Propellor RPM reduction may be initiated as aircraft passes a certain height AGL. The Condition Levers are very close to the Prop Levers, and once they are cut there's no going back! :hmm:

Picture indicates that the engines were not producing power at the time of impact (props bent towards rear).

drag king
21st May 2011, 07:29
Forced landing shortly after departure at about the place a Propellor RPM reduction may be initiated as aircraft passes a certain height AGL. The Condition Levers are very close to the Prop Levers, and once they are cut there's no going back!

Case solved then. Everybody back to work...:hmm:

DK :mad:

youngskywalker
21st May 2011, 07:49
The condition levers have to be pulled right back through a gate in the King Air to stop those PT6's, if memory serves me correct. I would be surprised if a Pilot accidently closed them rather than reduce the prop' rpm. Prop rpm reduction after take off is from a very small movement of the levers, if any, some operators dont reduce until top of climb.

His dudeness
21st May 2011, 08:43
...and coming back on the RPM´s means Torques rising, something you'd wanna watch closely to make sure not to go over that redline...

But then, **** just happens...

toolowtoofast
21st May 2011, 09:26
Forced landing shortly after departure at about the place a Propellor RPM reduction may be initiated as aircraft passes a certain height AGL. The Condition Levers are very close to the Prop Levers, and once they are cut there's no going back! :hmm:

Picture indicates that the engines were not producing power at the time of impact (props bent towards rear).

when the PT6 stops producing power, the props will eventually feather. all that picture tells us is that the props have been in fine pitch when they have struck. there is no real way of telling what the engines were doing as unless the props were intentionally feathered, a windmilling PT6 prop left in fine pitch will produce enough governor oil pressure for a period of time to keep the props in fine pitch. once the rear of the engine stops supplying oil to the governor, they will eventually feather, however i have shut down, waited 5 minutes, and restarted a PT6 without the prop going to feather.

eyeinthesky
21st May 2011, 10:17
Hold on a second.

At no point have I suggested that retarding the wrong levers was the cause. All I observed was that the forced landing occured close to a point in flight where manipulation of the levers is not uncommon and that the action of closing the wrong levers is irreversible. In some (Kingair) aircraft it is unnervingly easy to skip the condition levers past the small notch (gate) on the quadrant.

WRT the autofeathering issue the same would also be true in the case of engine failure due to another cause.

Why does my observation come in for such a flaming when other people seem so ready to accept broad statements about maintenance or fuel issues possibly being a cause? :mad:

youngskywalker
21st May 2011, 11:44
I don't think anybody has flamed you at all. I certainly didnt.

His dudeness
21st May 2011, 17:55
Me neither.

And is:

I wonder who does/ did the maintenance on this E90???

a 'broad statement' ? If so, who accepted it ?

421 didn´t, he said:

I doubt the maintenace is an issue. If you look at the other thread there was a NOTAM put out that stated get fuel from Shell only. All Jet A1 aircraft were grounded. That suggests a fuel contamination problem more than anything.

So that were the 2 statements with mx or fuel.... I´d suggest you´d get a thicker skin mate...


BTW, I´ve nether found it easy to get past that detent (4000+hrs in KA´s)

TeeS
23rd May 2011, 02:55
Slightly pedantic/drunk/bored head on but has there ever been a 'crash landing before take-off'? :)

TeeS

Pilotech
26th May 2011, 17:11
TeeS, I think it is possible...

... NTSB Releases Initial Report On G650 Crash | AVIATION WEEK (http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_generic.jsp?channel=busav&id=news/awx/2011/04/07/awx_04_07_2011_p0-307680.xml&headline=NTSB%20Releases%20Initial%20Report%20On%20G650%20Cr ash)
:sad:

tcasblue
18th Dec 2020, 02:01
Been a long time since this happened but I thought I might resurrect the thread with a report.

No evidence of engine malfunction or anything wrong with the aircraft. The takeoff roll was much longer than normal and td after rotating at a higher than normal speed and achieving a reasonable initial climb rate, the rate of climb decreased. There seemed to be some sort of power asymmetry as well. Yet, according to the report......."Maximum rpm was not selected for departure but it was unlikely that this explained the aircraft’s poor performance on the runway or in the air. The pilot insisted that he had set torque to the takeoff limit."

Sure would have been nice to have some sort of recording of power lever position as it would be nice to have actual confirmation that they were really at full power. No mention in the report on whether the friction knobs were found to be tight or loose.

Beech_90_N46BM_02-12.pdf (publishing.service.gov.uk) (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5422f537ed915d1374000537/Beech_90_N46BM_02-12.pdf)

rigpiggy
20th Dec 2020, 16:29
Like the DC3 the wheels protrude below the nacelles... https://www.planeandpilotmag.com/images/stories/iad/2009/august/multi/beechcraft-kingair1.jpg

rigpiggy
20th Dec 2020, 16:31
If mx had worked on it very possible that they had loosened off the throttle friction, and had a roll back.