Stuck_in_an_ATR
11th Feb 2011, 09:16
Please forgive another anorak question from me, but so far I haven't found a better place to ask them and get in-depth answers... :)
In the books I have read, flapback and flapforward are explained as being associated with forward speed and flapping of the advancing and retreating blades to equalize lift. Seems logical... :)
Now, why do you get flapforward when rapidly reducing the collective (like when entering autorotation)? Conversly, why do you get flapback when rising the collective? (eg. bottom of an approach)?
My guess is that changing the pitch angle by the same amount on both sides (when moving the collective) will result in greater flapping (be it up or down) on the advancing side, because the effect of blade pitch change is "amplified" by V squared...
So, eg. when reducing collective, the advancing side will "see" higher lift loss than the retreating side and thus will flap down causing the disk to tilt forward. Opposite would happen when rising the collective.
Is that correct?
Stuck.
In the books I have read, flapback and flapforward are explained as being associated with forward speed and flapping of the advancing and retreating blades to equalize lift. Seems logical... :)
Now, why do you get flapforward when rapidly reducing the collective (like when entering autorotation)? Conversly, why do you get flapback when rising the collective? (eg. bottom of an approach)?
My guess is that changing the pitch angle by the same amount on both sides (when moving the collective) will result in greater flapping (be it up or down) on the advancing side, because the effect of blade pitch change is "amplified" by V squared...
So, eg. when reducing collective, the advancing side will "see" higher lift loss than the retreating side and thus will flap down causing the disk to tilt forward. Opposite would happen when rising the collective.
Is that correct?
Stuck.