PDA

View Full Version : Does the RAAF want more C-17's?


Going Boeing
15th Jul 2010, 03:56
No more C-17s, DOD officials tell Congress
The military has more than enough large transport planes
http://www.asdnews.com/data_news/ID29119_600.jpg
(Washington, July 13, 2010) -- The military has more than enough large transport planes, and the appropriation of any more in the next budget year will force some into premature retirement, Defense Department officials told a congressional panel July 13.

"We have enough C-17s," said Mike McCord, the principal deputy undersecretary of defense (comptroller). "Money spent on things we don't need takes away from those we do need."

Along with Mr. McCord, Maj. Gen. Susan Y. Desjardins, the director of strategic plans for Air Mobility Command, and Alan Estevez, the principal deputy assistant secretary of defense for logistical and materiel readiness, repeated Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates' position against the purchase of more C-17 Globemaster IIIs to the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs' federal financial management subcommittee.

All three defense officials agreed with the subcommittee's leaders, Sens. Thomas Carper and John McCain, that the C-17, in addition to the C-5 Galaxy, has been critical to airlift in and out of Iraq and Afghanistan. However, they said, the military's current fleet of 223 C-17s and 111 C-5s is more than enough airlift capability for years to come.

A department study that concluded in February was consistent with two other studies that found that the current fleet is sufficient "even in the most demanding environments" to take the military through 2016, Mr. McCord said.

The oldest plane in the transport fleet, Lockheed's C-5, will be viable until 2025, and the fleet as a whole should last until 2040, he said.

The department has not requested C-17s, built by Boeing, since the fiscal 2007 budget, yet Congress has added them every year since, spending about $1.25 billion on C-17s "that we don't want or need," said Mr. McCord, who was a 21-year staff member of the Senate Armed Services Committee before his current appointment.

Any additional appropriation for C-17s will have to be offset by retiring some of the military's older, but still viable, transport planes, the defense officials said.

And, adding force structure such as aircraft always entails additional costs in training, maintenance, and infrastructure, such as new hangars, bases and tooling, defense officials said.

The department spends about $50,000 per aircraft per year to store aircraft where spare parts are available, General Desjardins said.

"It's the gift that keeps on giving, because if you give it to us, we'll maintain it," Mr. Estevez said.

It would be more cost-effective, the defense officials said, to modify the C-5M for longer viability to continue to work in conjunction with the C-17.

Mr. Desjardins called the C-17 the "backbone" of the air mobility fleet, and said the C-5's combination of long range, high capacity and capability to carry outsize cargo is unequaled.

Together, she said, "they meet the needs for cargo and capacity anywhere in the world."

Retiring the least-capable C-5s would save about $320 million, General Desjardins said.

"Making tradeoffs of two types of aircraft when we already have more than enough of both is not going be cost effective," Mr. McCord said.

When asked what the department would cut to accommodate any new C-17s, Mr. McCord said that would depend on how many new C-17s were bought.

"You and Congress would decide that," he said, "because you would cut from our budget about $300 million for every C-17 added."

"We have a good mix right now," Mr. Estevez said. "Replacement is definitely not the most cost-effective way. Buying more to retire more is certainly not the way the department needs to balance its resources."

The defense secretary has made that case to Congress, and President Barack Obama has promised to veto any legislation that provides for more C-17s.

Source : AFPS

If they are surplus to US military needs, perhaps the ADF could pick up a couple more fairly cheap. :ok:

Cougar
17th Jul 2010, 05:49
Don't you love US politics - undoubtedly Californian senator hears C17 production line will shut in 20XX year due to no more orders, meaning loss of 20,000 or so jobs from the Long Beach factory. Said senator then cuts a deal in congress that means that the military must buy more, even if they don't need them.

:ugh::ugh::ugh:

Aussie
18th Jul 2010, 12:58
Its not just US politics... happens all over the world my friend, believe me!

Capn Bloggs
19th Jul 2010, 07:09
"We have enough C-17s," said Mike McCord, the principal deputy undersecretary of defense (comptroller). "Money spent on things we don't need takes away from those we do need."

If they are surplus to US military needs, perhaps the ADF could pick up a couple more fairly cheap.
GB, you are falling for the same trap as the Yanks. They may be surplus to Yank requirements/nice to have, but do we need them? Besides, what do you like about them; they aren't even Boeings! :E

OZBUSDRIVER
19th Jul 2010, 09:03
Maybe, another two would be a good idea:ok: Six is better than four:ok:

Like This - Do That
19th Jul 2010, 10:26
I've heard rumours that CDF wants more J model Hercs in preference to the C-17s .... he's holding out .... so Ronnie's going slow on more Js hoping that CDF retires before the C-17 line is shut and the opportunity is lost.

Is the RAAF sufficiently resourced to pay for the fuel burnt by the C-17s?

I dunno - I'm just asking. As I said - rumours & speculation.

Cougar
23rd Jul 2010, 04:15
Great rumour LTDT! :ok:

Quokka
23rd Jul 2010, 19:42
If they are surplus to US military needs, perhaps the ADF could pick up a couple more fairly cheap.

Don't be too excited about the idea of purchasing cheap second-hand C-17s. Our American friends have a history of selling us second-hand equipment with substantial corrosion...


C-17 ACI Corrosion Findings

P20 Fuselage Skin Corrosion:

Significant corrosion on fuselage sin interior, and under external rubstrips
All fairing panels opened up; corrosion found in approximately 200 fastener holes
Worst corrosion conditions at fastener holes repaired with Jo-bolts
Proposal submitted to inspect/repair corrosion. Design and process changes to be incorporated to reduce corrosion potential.


Extract from a presentation: "Corrosion Management of Airlift Assets"

Colonel Darrell H. Holcomb
Commander
330th Strategic Airlift Sustainment Group
USAF